Solary 3-1 Anubis Gaming — EMEA Masters 2026 Results & Stats

TL;DR: Piero was the spine of Solary’s 3-1 EMEA Masters series win over Anubis Gaming, averaging a 9.4 KDA across Lulu, Pyke and Alistar. Solary turned a close opener into control, absorbed a Game 2 upset, then answered with a 25-4 Game 3 rout and closed out the series.

Key Takeaways

• Piero averaged a 9.4 KDA across the series, providing the connective force behind Solary’s different game plans.
• The clearest turning point came in Game 3: Solary won 25-4 after the series was level at 1-1, transforming a narrow draft-model lean into a commanding result.
• Solary won the series 3-1. Game 1 was close at 24-18, while the final two wins were far more decisive, with Solary’s combined kill margin at 47-11.

Before the Series

The pre-match picture leaned heavily toward Solary: Polymarket priced the team at 86% to win the series, against 14% for Anubis Gaming. Yet the story was not simply a favourite cruising. Piero’s value lay in giving Solary a steady spine through changing compositions and game states, helping the team recover when the first clear stumble arrived.

The draft predictions offered a useful test of that confidence. The model gave Solary 53% in Game 1, 50% in Game 2 and 50% in Game 3; it favored Anubis Gaming 51% in Game 4. Across the four games, those calls went hit, miss, hit, miss. The draft edge pointed to the winner in two games, but never explained the whole series by itself.

Game 1 — Setting the Tone

The opener was scrappy rather than comfortable. Solary edged the kills 24-18, but Anubis Gaming stayed close enough to keep every fight tense. The difference was what happened after those clashes: Solary secured 2 Barons to 0 and finished with a 7-3 tower advantage.

That conversion made the model’s 53% Solary lean a correct call, but the result was earned through map control, not prediction alone. Solary’s 69.4k gold against Anubis Gaming’s 64.3k reflected the growing territorial gap. After the win, the series market surged to 96% for Solary.

Game 2 — The Pivot

Then came the reversal. At draft close, the market gave Solary 74% and Anubis Gaming 26%; the draft model also narrowly favored Solary at 50%. Anubis Gaming won anyway, taking the game 22-12 and delivering the series’ clearest upset.

The supplied record does not include a timeline or objective statistics, so the win’s precise turning point cannot be reconstructed. What is clear is the effect: Solary’s draft prediction failed to match the result, and the market’s confidence fell to 80%. Anubis had interrupted the expected sweep, but Solary had not yet lost its grip on the series.

Game 3+ — The Climax

Solary answered with its most forceful performance. With the series tied 1-1, the model again favored Solary at 50%, and this time the pick proved right in emphatic fashion: Solary won 25-4. The available game record does not supply a minute-by-minute account, but the 21-kill margin makes the scale of the response unmistakable.

The market had already favored Solary at draft close, 72% to 28%, and its confidence rebounded to 94% after the game. Game 4 completed the arc. The model gave Anubis Gaming a slight 51% edge, yet Solary won 22-7. The final game’s close is not detailed in the record, so its decisive sequence remains unknown; the result itself is clear. Solary’s final two games produced a combined 47-11 kill score.

Aftermath

The 3-1 finish belongs to Solary, but the series was shaped by its response as much as its control. Anubis Gaming’s Game 2 win exposed the limits of both the market’s expectation and a narrow draft lean. Solary answered with two decisive scorelines, while Piero’s 9.4 KDA captures the consistency that linked the victories. The draft model was right in Games 1 and 3, wrong in Games 2 and 4: a useful signal, not a substitute for execution.

Polymarket Trajectory

The market began with Solary as a strong series favourite, and the opener reinforced that reading. Game 2 was the important failure: despite Solary’s clear game-level advantage before play, Anubis Gaming won and the series price on Solary dropped sharply. That reaction recognized real uncertainty, but it did not anticipate what followed. Solary’s 25-4 Game 3 made the favourite’s underlying case look stronger again, and the final win confirmed the pre-match direction.

The draft record offered mixed clues rather than a reliable forecast: Solary’s narrow model edges held in Games 1 and 3, but not Game 2, and Anubis’s slight Game 4 edge did not hold either. Piero’s steady series-wide impact was a signal of Solary’s resilience that individual draft percentages could not capture.

Series Stats

FAQ

*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-10-14 21:20 UTC.*