Blog

Solary’s Double Baron Sets the Tone Against Anubis Gaming

Solary overcame a chaotic, skirmish-heavy opener to beat Anubis Gaming in 32:21, claiming two Barons and a commanding objective edge at EMEA Masters.

GAME 1EMEA MastersSummer Main EventBo5Game 1Patch 26.20
Solary
SolaryWinner
32:21
Anubis Gaming
Anubis Gaming
Polymarket, Game marketmarket probability: Anubis Gaming vs SolaryFAVORITE
Game (draft close)Solary won (76% pre-game)
25%76%
Series (now)post-game, Solary 1-0 Anubis Gaming
5%96%
Series (draft close)pre-game anchor
14%87%
Δ Series after this game: -9.0pp for Anubis Gaming

Solary turned a chaotic opener into a controlled win with two Barons.

MVP

Zicssi
ZicssiQiyanaQiyana

Solary's Qiyana helped the favored side turn a chaotic game into objective control.

Verified predictions

  • Live draft model favored Solary at 53%. They won — confirm whether the draft edge materialized in-game. Pre-match

TL;DR: Solary won a chaotic, skirmish-heavy 32:21 opener against Anubis Gaming, turning a close kill count into control through two Barons and a 7-3 tower advantage. The live draft model’s 53% lean proved right, but Solary’s objective conversion—not merely the predicted draft edge—made the difference in this EMEA Masters 2026 game.

Key Takeaways

  • Solary finished with 24-18 kills, showing how it could win the brawls without leaving Anubis Gaming far behind on takedowns.
  • Solary claimed 2 Barons to 0, converting the decisive objective edge into a path to victory.
  • Anubis Gaming ended on 64.3k gold against Solary’s 69.4k, a 5.1k gap that reflected Solary’s stronger map control.

Early Game

The opening game of the EMEA Masters 2026 Season Summer Main Event began on the terms suggested by the draft: Solary had routes to protect Yunara and create picks with Qiyana, while Anubis Gaming needed to make Ryze’s matchup and Kha'Zix’s access to isolated targets count. The live draft model gave Solary a 53% edge. That lean materialized, though the result came through execution on the map rather than a quiet, uncontested game.

Instead, the teams traded pressure in a skirmish-heavy contest. Anubis Gaming stayed close enough in kills to keep the game volatile, but Solary’s composition could turn fights into objectives. The final 24-18 kill count captures the disorder; the tower count, 7-3 for Solary, shows who steadily translated that disorder into territory.

The Turning Point

Baron became the dividing line. Solary secured 2 Barons, while Anubis Gaming took 0. Those captures gave Solary the leverage to press across the map, deepen its tower lead, and convert scattered fights into a growing gold advantage.

The draft’s central warning had been that Solary should use Qiyana to find picks and prevent Ryze from dictating objective fights. Solary’s overall control of the major objectives fits that plan: Anubis could still fight back, but it did not match Solary’s access to the map’s most powerful win condition. The dragon count also favored Solary, 3-1, adding another layer of objective control.

Closing Out

The game lasted 32:21, long enough for Anubis Gaming to remain a threat in skirmishes, but Solary’s lead in structures and objectives held. The final gold totals—69.4k for Solary and 64.3k for Anubis Gaming—show a clear advantage built from pressure rather than a runaway kill score. Solary also finished ahead in towers and dragons, giving the brawling game a controlled finish.

Polymarket Market

At draft close, the game market priced Solary at 76% and Anubis Gaming at 24%. Solary delivered the expected result, and the market read the winner correctly; the live draft model was more cautious at 53%, while the match’s 2-0 Baron count and 7-3 tower edge reveal how Solary converted its advantage into control. The market’s series outlook moved from 86% for Solary at draft close to 96% after the game, while Anubis Gaming fell from 14% to 4%. That shift makes Solary the clear favorite for the next game, though this opener’s close kill count showed Anubis can still contest fights.

FAQ

Q: How did Solary turn the skirmishes into a win?

Solary secured 2 Barons to 0 and finished with a 7-3 tower advantage, turning fights into map control.

Q: Did the draft prediction hold up in game?

Yes. The live draft model favored Solary at 53%, and Solary won; its objective control made that edge count.

*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-10-14 21:17 UTC.*

Next chapter, Draft G2Solary’s Vayne-Draven Gamble: EMEA Masters Game 2 Draft