← Blog
Live Draft Analysis

HANJIN BRION vs kt Rolster: Kled Tests KT in LCK

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

HANJIN BRION’s Kled challenges kt Rolster’s Olaf in LCK Game 1, while a 50-50 draft model clashes with KT’s market edge.

HANJIN BRIONHanjin Brion
Live Draft Analysis
50%·50%
PICKS
kt Rolsterkt Rolster
Casting
Casting
20G65.0%VS GLBOlaf
37G59.5%GLOBAL
5G40.0%VS LCKOlaf
5G40.0%LCK
Kled
Kled
topTOP
Olaf
Olaf
PerfecT
PerfecT
GLOBAL55.3%311G
KledVS GLB35.0%20G
LCK72.2%36G
KledVS LCK60.0%5G
PERFECT66.7%3G
4.1 KDA
GIDEON
GIDEON
112G57.1%VS GLBNocturne
1391G52.1%GLOBAL
11G54.5%VS LCKNocturne
137G52.6%LCK
7.4 KDA
7G42.9%GIDEON
Jarvan IV
Jarvan IV
jungleJGL
Nocturne
Nocturne
Cuzz
Cuzz
GLOBAL49.4%724G
Jarvan IVVS GLB42.9%112G
LCK53.7%67G
Jarvan IVVS LCK45.5%11G
CUZZ71.4%7G
5.1 KDA
Roamer
Roamer
228G49.6%VS GLBRyze
569G52.7%GLOBAL
26G50.0%VS LCKRyze
59G42.4%LCK
0.7 KDA
3G0.0%ROAMER
Anivia
Anivia
midMID
Ryze
Ryze
Bdd
Bdd
GLOBAL51.4%1384G
AniviaVS GLB50.4%228G
LCK56.0%134G
AniviaVS LCK50.0%26G
BDD53.3%15G
5.5 KDA
Teddy
Teddy
19G57.9%VS GLBMiss Fortune
725G49.8%GLOBAL
3G33.3%VS LCKMiss Fortune
78G46.2%LCK
3.5 KDA
9G44.4%TEDDY
Lucian
Lucian
bottomBOT
Miss Fortune
Miss Fortune
Jiwoo
Jiwoo
GLOBAL48.5%272G
LucianVS GLB42.1%19G
LCK51.5%33G
LucianVS LCK66.7%3G
Namgung
Namgung
60G46.7%VS GLBNautilus
557G48.8%GLOBAL
7G42.9%VS LCKNautilus
59G45.8%LCK
5.0 KDA
8G37.5%NAMGUNG
Milio
Milio
supportSUP
Nautilus
Nautilus
Effort
Effort
GLOBAL46.6%1072G
MilioVS GLB53.3%60G
LCK39.5%76G
MilioVS LCK57.1%7G
EFFORT36.4%11G
3.9 KDA
Hanjin Brion 50%50% kt Rolster
Polymarketmarket probability · HANJIN BRION · kt Rolster
Game 1
42%·59%
Seriesnow
30%·71%
Pre-matchseries · 90 min before
26%·75%
Δ Series: +4.0pp for HANJIN BRIONFull model: 50% / 50%

TL;DR: In LCK Game 1, HANJIN BRION’s Kled confronts kt Rolster’s Olaf in a draft the model calls HANJIN BRION 50% — kt Rolster 50%. The defining wrinkle is KT’s 35% global WR over 20G against Kled, although its LCK record rises to 60% over 5G; Olaf must turn that regional edge into a side-lane lead.

Compositions: HANJIN BRION vs kt Rolster

HANJIN BRION drafted a skirmish-and-scaling composition around Casting’s Kled, GIDEON’s Jarvan IV, Roamer’s Anivia, Teddy’s Lucian and Namgung’s Milio. Jarvan IV and Kled want early engage around river fights, while Anivia’s wall and Milio’s protection can turn mid-game objectives into controlled teamfights. Lucian needs a clean early lane rather than a prolonged poke war.

kt Rolster answer with PerfecT’s Olaf, Cuzz’s Nocturne, Bdd’s Ryze, Jiwoo’s Miss Fortune and Effort’s Nautilus. Their core is direct engage: Nocturne darkness, Nautilus initiation and Miss Fortune’s ultimate can punish HANJIN BRION’s short-range commitment. Ryze also gives KT stronger side-lane scaling, while Olaf can split-push if Kled loses control of top.

Key Picks and Stats

Casting’s Kled is the draft’s pressure point: 59.5% global WR over 37G becomes only 40.0% LCK WR over 5G, and Kled is 40.0% versus Olaf in LCK over 5G. Yet PerfecT’s Olaf has a 72.2% LCK WR over 36G, a 66.7% WR over 3G for PerfecT, and the unusual regional matchup edge. KT are clearly betting that their Olaf answer is deliberate, not forced.

Jungle favors HANJIN BRION statistically. GIDEON’s Jarvan IV holds 52.1% global WR over 1391G, 52.6% LCK WR over 137G, and 54.5% versus Nocturne in LCK over 11G, though GIDEON himself is at 42.9% over 7G with a 7.4 KDA. Cuzz’s Nocturne has a 53.7% LCK WR over 67G and Cuzz owns a 71.4% WR over 7G with a 5.1 KDA, making the ultimate timing more important than the broad matchup sample.

Mid is a volatile counterweight. Roamer’s Anivia has 42.4% LCK WR over 59G and Roamer is 0.0% over 3G with a 0.7 KDA, against Bdd’s 56.0% LCK WR over 134G, 53.3% over 15G and 5.5 KDA on Ryze. Anivia versus Ryze is 50.0% in LCK over 26G, but player form strongly favors Bdd. Bot lane gives Teddy’s Lucian a 46.2% LCK WR over 78G versus Jiwoo’s Miss Fortune at 51.5% over 33G; Namgung’s Milio is 42.9% versus Nautilus in LCK over 7G, while Effort’s Nautilus is 57.1% in that matchup.

Draft Edge

The pre-draft forecast expected KT to value Jarvan IV, Karma and response trios, with Jarvan IV as its likely B1; instead, GIDEON secured Jarvan IV for HANJIN BRION. Orianna, Varus and Bard were expected bans, but the supplied draft contains no ban list, so those bans cannot be confirmed. Kled is the forecast-breaking pick: it asks Casting to survive Olaf and gives HANJIN BRION a sharp early engage route.

KT retain the cleaner win condition: isolate Anivia through Nocturne-Nautilus engage, then layer Miss Fortune damage. HANJIN BRION need Jarvan IV to create early numbers advantages before Ryze scaling and Olaf side pressure take over.

Polymarket Market

Polymarket prices Game 1 at HANJIN BRION 42% — kt Rolster 58%, while the Series Now market is HANJIN BRION 29% — kt Rolster 71%. HANJIN BRION’s series price climbed from 26% pre-match to 29% now, a move of +45.5 percentage points as supplied, yet KT remain the decisive favorite.

The Game market is more optimistic about HANJIN BRION than the series market: 42% versus 29%. That reflects a draft with genuine Jarvan IV-Kled upset potential, but KT’s Bdd Ryze, Cuzz Nocturne and PerfecT Olaf records explain why real-money traders still favor KT.

Prediction

The model remains HANJIN BRION 50% — kt Rolster 50%, but the player-specific mid and top data shift this draft to kt Rolster 52% — HANJIN BRION 48%. HANJIN BRION’s 0.400 team-form signal and 0.405 Elo signal trail KT’s 0.595 Elo, while KT’s 0.300 form warns that a failed early engage can quickly snowball the other way.

FAQ

Q: Can Casting’s Kled beat PerfecT’s Olaf for HANJIN BRION?

Kled’s 40.0% versus Olaf in LCK over 5G is concerning, while PerfecT has a 72.2% LCK WR over 36G on Olaf. Casting needs Jarvan IV assistance before Olaf can split-push freely.

Q: Why is Bdd’s Ryze so important against Roamer’s Anivia?

Bdd has a 53.3% WR over 15G and 5.5 KDA on Ryze, whereas Roamer is 0.0% over 3G with a 0.7 KDA on Anivia. The lane matchup is even in league data, but the player samples are not.

*Data: draftlol live draft model + Polymarket, draft close.*