Bilibili Gaming 3-0 Dplus Kia — Worlds 2026 Results & Stats

TL;DR: Bilibili Gaming swept Dplus Kia 3-0 at Worlds 2026, never dropping a game despite the live draft model favoring Dplus Kia in Games 1 and 3. Xun’s explosive opener, Knight’s steady Orianna in Game 2, and relentless objective control turned a close series forecast into a decisive League of Legends result.

Key Takeaways

• Xun was the series’ defining force: his 12/1/8 Naafiri performance in Game 1 helped Bilibili Gaming seize momentum after he trailed by 1,489 gold at 15.
• The turning point was Bilibili Gaming’s river control: it took 5 dragons to 0 in both Games 1 and 2, erasing Dplus Kia’s early advantages before those leads could become wins.
• Bilibili Gaming won the series 3-0. Game 2 was the closest finish, with Bilibili Gaming winning 13-10 in 32:20; Games 1 and 3 ended 24-10 and 25-9.

Before the Series

The pre-match question was whether Dplus Kia could turn draft priorities into control. Nocturne entered with 91.3% presence and a 75% ban rate, while Dplus Kia banned him in 64.1% of its games. Vi also looked dangerous: she had an 85.7% win rate in 7 games as a first pick, and Jarvan IV carried an 80% win rate in 5 games as a first pick. Those numbers made the jungle draft a clear pressure point.

The pre-draft watchlist also flagged Orianna, Jarvan IV, Pantheon, and Ezreal. Their appearances did not produce a uniform payoff. Knight’s Orianna was decisive in Game 2, and Jarvan IV helped Dplus Kia remain involved with 8 assists. Ezreal supplied 35.6% of Bilibili Gaming’s damage in that game, but the prediction that the champions would appear was stronger than any claim that each would carry. Pantheon appeared in Game 3, yet Lucid finished 4/5/3 and could not make the pick a route back into the series.

Setting the Tone

Game 1 established the series’ central contradiction: the live draft model gave Dplus Kia 51%, but Bilibili Gaming won 24-10. Dplus Kia’s Qiyana helped put Xun’s Naafiri 1,489 gold behind at 15. That deficit looked like the start of a Dplus Kia snowball, but it became a brief opening rather than a lasting advantage.

Bilibili Gaming’s coordinated engage brought Xun back into fights, while Knight’s Galio finished 4/0/15. The team took 5 dragons to 0 and 2 Barons to 0, translating recovery into map control. The first prediction-model read therefore failed: Dplus Kia had the projected draft edge, but Bilibili Gaming dictated the game where it mattered.

Sealing It

Game 2 tightened the scoreline without changing the direction. The live draft model favored Bilibili Gaming 51%, and this time its edge translated into a win. Dplus Kia’s Kennen gave Siwoo a 1,105-gold lead at 15 over Bin’s Gnar, but Bilibili Gaming kept the river under control. Knight went 2/0/8 on Orianna, a 10.00 KDA, as Bilibili Gaming again claimed 5 dragons to 0.

That made Game 3 a final test of whether Dplus Kia could disrupt the pattern. The model swung back to Dplus Kia at 53%, but the predicted edge failed again. Viper’s Lucian built a +1,026 gold lead at 15 over Smash’s Aphelios, giving Bilibili Gaming room to dictate the pace. Bin’s Jax ended 12/4/5, and ON recorded an 18.00 KDA as Bilibili Gaming secured 4 dragons to 1 and 2 Barons to 0. Dplus Kia never found the opening to force a fourth game.

Aftermath

The series was not a simple draft-model story. Two of the three live calls leaned toward Dplus Kia, and both were wrong; the Game 2 call favored Bilibili Gaming and proved right. What connected the results was execution after the opening: Bilibili Gaming repeatedly turned objectives into control, even when Dplus Kia had an early lane or gold advantage. Xun supplied the explosive first-game swing, Knight stabilized the middle, and Viper, Bin, and ON closed the door. The 3-0 sweep was emphatic, but Game 2 showed Dplus Kia could keep the contest close before Bilibili Gaming took over the map.

Polymarket Trajectory

The market began with Bilibili Gaming favored at 58%, while Dplus Kia stood at 42%. That favorite proved correct, but the opening game was treated as almost even at draft close; Bilibili Gaming’s win prompted a sharp change in the series outlook. After Game 1, the market’s confidence in Bilibili Gaming rose, then climbed again after Game 2 made the sweep a possibility rather than a distant outcome. The game-level prices stayed comparatively close, a reminder that a single-game forecast and a series forecast are different questions. The signal that proved most durable was not a dramatic draft advantage, but Bilibili Gaming’s ability to recover from early deficits and keep converting dragons into control. Its repeated objective dominance was already visible before the final game confirmed the sweep.

Series Stats

FAQ

*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-11-06 00:47 UTC.*