← Blog
Series

Deep Cross Gaming 2-1 Ground Zero Gaming — LCP 2026 Results & Stats

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

Deep Cross Gaming beat Ground Zero Gaming 2-1 in LCP 2026. Full series recap: drafts, gold timelines, player stats and odds history.

Deep Cross GamingDeep Cross GamingWinner
Series21
Ground Zero GamingGround Zero Gaming
G1Ground Zero Gaming28:40
G2Deep Cross Gaming42:00
G3Deep Cross Gaming30:40
Polymarket — Trajectorymarket across the series · Deep Cross Gaming · Ground Zero Gaming
Pre-match
series · before Game 1
78%·22%
G1 · draft closeUPSET
game marketGround Zero Gaming won
71%·30%
After G1
series · market reaction
38%·62%
G2 · draft closeFAVORITE
game marketDeep Cross Gaming won
63%·37%
After G2
series · market reaction
59%·42%
G3 · draft closeFAVORITE
game marketDeep Cross Gaming won
65%·36%
Final score: 2-1resolved odds omitted (0% / 100%)

TL;DR: After dropping Game 1, Deep Cross Gaming flipped the series and took it 2-1 against Ground Zero Gaming in the LCP 2026 Season Split 3. The team overcame a 3003-gold deficit in Game 2 and delivered a dominant Game 3 performance to secure the victory despite pre-match odds favoring them at 78 percent.

Deep Cross Gaming won the series 2-1 against Ground Zero Gaming in the LCP 2026 Season Split 3 after losing the opener.

Key Takeaways

- ShiauC anchored the series with a 17.0 KDA and 89 percent kill participation on Braum in the decisive Game 3, providing the frontline stability that enabled a 13k gold snowball. - The most decisive moment arrived in Game 2 when Deep Cross Gaming erased a 3003-gold deficit at 15 minutes behind Flauren's Yorick split-push and Pop9's Naafiri engages to force a 1-1 tie. - Deep Cross Gaming claimed the series 2-1 after Ground Zero Gaming's 24-5 stomp in 28:40 contrasted sharply with the 42-minute and 30:40 contests that followed.

Before the Series

Pre-match data showed Deep Cross Gaming at a 17-10 record against Ground Zero Gaming's 6-12 mark, aligning with Polymarket odds of 78 percent for the favorites. Pre-draft analysis flagged Orianna, Rumble, Cassiopeia, Gnar and Jarvan IV as key pieces. The live draft model correctly favored Ground Zero Gaming at 51 percent in Game 1 and Deep Cross Gaming at 50 percent in Game 2, yet failed to predict the Game 3 outcome where the model gave Ground Zero Gaming a 51 percent edge that never materialized.

Game 1 — Setting the Tone

Ground Zero Gaming stunned the favorites with a 24-5 victory in 28:40. Betty's Ezreal posted a perfect 10/0/8 while Kaiwing's Alistar finished 0/0/22, creating a bot-lane gap that fueled a 16k gold lead. 1Jiang's Rumble went 7/2/6 and helped secure the lone baron, validating the pre-draft pick. The 51 percent draft edge translated directly into the result even though the market had priced Ground Zero Gaming at just 30 percent.

Game 2 — The Pivot

Deep Cross Gaming refused to collapse after the early deficit. 1Jiang's Jayce and Betty's Mel built a 3003-gold advantage for Ground Zero Gaming at 15 minutes, yet Flauren's Yorick turned negative gold into map pressure and Pop9's Naafiri delivered a 9/2/9 performance. Deep Cross Gaming claimed both barons and finished with a 10-4 tower edge in 42 minutes, proving the 50 percent draft model correct and leveling the series.

Game 3 — The Climax

Deep Cross Gaming responded with authority. HongSuo's Orianna built a +1481 gold lead by minute 15 with 79 percent kill participation, while ShiauC's Braum posted a 17.0 KDA and 89 percent kill participation. The team outpaced Ground Zero Gaming 64.2k to 51.2k in gold, securing nine towers and the lone baron in 30:40. Pre-draft flags for Orianna and Gnar held true as execution overrode the model's 51 percent lean toward Ground Zero Gaming.

Aftermath

Deep Cross Gaming's ability to absorb the Game 1 blow and execute in the final two games secured the 2-1 series win. The pre-draft champions largely delivered, with Orianna and Rumble shining in their respective victories while Cassiopeia struggled for the losers.

Polymarket Trajectory

The market opened with Deep Cross Gaming at 78 percent but swung sharply after the Game 1 upset that favored the underdog at just 30 percent. Odds then moved to 62 percent for Ground Zero Gaming before stabilizing around 58-64 percent for Deep Cross Gaming once the favorites delivered in Games 2 and 3. The biggest signal came from the draft models that correctly called the first two results yet could not anticipate how execution in Game 3 would override the pre-game lean.

Series Stats

GameWinnerDurationKillsSeries MVP Highlight
Game 1Ground Zero Gaming28:405-24Betty's Ezreal 10/0/8
Game 2Deep Cross Gaming42:0020-22Pop9 Naafiri 9/2/9
Game 3Deep Cross Gaming30:4019-6ShiauC's Braum 17.0 KDA

FAQ

Q: Why did Deep Cross Gaming win the series despite losing Game 1? A: They erased a 3003-gold deficit in Game 2 and dominated Game 3 with HongSuo's Orianna and ShiauC's Braum to claim the 2-1 victory.

Q: Did the pre-draft flagged champions deliver as predicted?

Orianna and Rumble performed strongly in their wins while Cassiopeia underperformed for Deep Cross Gaming across the series.

*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-07-30 15:23 UTC.*