← Blog
Series

CTBC Flying Oyster 2-0 Deep Cross Gaming — LCP 2026 Results & Stats

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

CTBC Flying Oyster beat Deep Cross Gaming 2-0 in LCP 2026. Full series recap: drafts, gold timelines, player stats and odds history.

CTBC Flying OysterCtbc Flying OysterWinner
Series20
Deep Cross GamingDeep Cross Gaming
G1Ctbc Flying Oyster35:50
G2Ctbc Flying Oyster30:40
Polymarket — Trajectorymarket across the series · CTBC Flying Oyster · Deep Cross Gaming
Pre-match
series · before Game 1
37%·64%
G1 · draft closeUPSET
game marketCTBC Flying Oyster won
38%·63%
After G1
series · market reaction
64%·36%
G2 · draft closeUPSET
game marketCTBC Flying Oyster won
44%·56%
Final score: 2-0resolved odds omitted (0% / 100%)

TL;DR: CTBC Flying Oyster swept Deep Cross Gaming 2-0 despite entering the day as the underdog, and the sweep mattered because it overturned both the standings story and the market read. Doggo, POUT, and Shad0w gave CTBC Flying Oyster a clear carry identity, then proved it in two increasingly one-sided wins.

CTBC Flying Oyster swept Deep Cross Gaming 2-0 without dropping a single game, and they did it by turning an expected uphill series into a statement about execution. What looked like a mismatch on paper became a lesson in how a team with cleaner fights, firmer objective control, and one reliable carry route can erase record-based expectations.

Key Takeaways

  • Series MVP: Doggo. The pre-match question pointed directly at Doggo, and the answer held up. His Ezreal in Game 1 finished 10/3/10 with a 6.67 KDA and +731 GoldDiff@15, giving CTBC Flying Oyster the scaling anchor that let the whole series breathe on their terms.
  • The decisive turn of the series came in Game 1, when POUT’s Syndra recovered from -883 GoldDiff@15 and helped flip a live draft model that still gave Deep Cross Gaming 52%. Once CTBC Flying Oyster won that opener 33-16 with 4 dragons to 1 and 2 barons to 0, the pressure shifted completely.
  • The final score looked clean, but it was also emphatic: CTBC Flying Oyster won by a combined 58-25 in kills across 35:50 and 30:40. Pre-match Polymarket had them at only 36% for the series, yet they answered with a sweep over a 17W-9L opponent after coming in at 5W-11L.

Before the Series

Everything before champion select pointed toward Deep Cross Gaming. They owned the better record at 17W-9L, had beaten CTBC Flying Oyster 2-0 in the most recent meeting, and entered this series as the market favorite. The pre-match logic was understandable: if the games slowed into standard scaling structures, Deep Cross Gaming were supposed to be the steadier team.

But the predictive details told a more interesting story. The player to watch was Doggo, whose 28.2% damage share and 3.1 KDA represented CTBC Flying Oyster’s clearest route to winning late fights. The pre-draft champion list also mattered: Orianna, Rumble, Jarvan IV, and Ezreal were all flagged as defining pieces. Across the series, that forecast was only partly about raw scoreboard dominance. Ezreal absolutely delivered as predicted by becoming the cleanest carry performance of the match, while Orianna, Rumble, and Jarvan IV mattered more as proof that the pre-series read on priority picks was correct, even if they did not define the series as vividly as CTBC Flying Oyster’s actual stars.

Game 1 — Setting the Tone

Game 1 was the upset that changed the shape of everything. Deep Cross Gaming were still favored both by record and by the live draft model at 52%, and for a short stretch the opener followed that script. Then CTBC Flying Oyster made the game about action speed rather than reputation.

The most important thing about the 33-16 win was not only the kill gap. It was the way CTBC Flying Oyster translated skirmishes into permanent map ownership: 11 towers to 3, 80.0k to 66.3k gold, 4 dragons to 1, and 2 barons to 0. Doggo’s Ezreal was the series’ first fulfilled prediction, not merely surviving lane but becoming the exact scaling insurance the preview imagined. Beside him, POUT’s Syndra turned that ugly early gold deficit into the lane pressure and follow-up burst that cracked open mid game. This was also the first clear verdict on the draft model: the Game 1 edge for Deep Cross Gaming did not translate at all once the fights started.

Game 2 — The Pivot

The second game was not really a pivot in scoreline, because CTBC Flying Oyster never let the series pivot back. It was the confirmation. After Game 1, the question was whether Deep Cross Gaming could stabilize. Instead, CTBC Flying Oyster produced the cleaner and faster win.

Shad0w Naafiri created the jungle gap immediately with +876 GoldDiff@15 and finished 8/4/7, making every early skirmish feel tilted before Deep Cross Gaming could set a front line. POUT’s Akali then became the execution blade of the closeout, ending 9/0/5 with a 14.0 KDA. The result was a 25-9 win in 30:40, backed by 3 dragons to 0 and the kind of relentless mid-game punish that never gave Deep Cross Gaming a reset.

This was where the live draft model did land correctly. It gave CTBC Flying Oyster a slight edge at 53%, and unlike Game 1, that edge became reality on the Rift. Across the full series, then, the draft models split: one false read in the opener, one accurate read in the close.

Aftermath

What makes this 2-0 sweep memorable is how thoroughly it overturned the expected hierarchy. CTBC Flying Oyster did not just steal two games; they disproved the idea that Deep Cross Gaming’s stronger season record would automatically control the series. Doggo validated the pre-match swing-player call, POUT became the emotional center of both wins, and Shad0w supplied the acceleration that made Game 2 feel inevitable.

The champion predictions also deserve a final verdict. Ezreal was the clearest hit, because it directly powered the win condition everyone could see coming. Orianna, Rumble, and Jarvan IV still mattered across the series as priority confirmations from the pre-draft read, but this sweep was ultimately decided less by champion theory than by CTBC Flying Oyster executing faster and cleaner around every important fight.

Polymarket Trajectory

The market’s series read started from a reasonable premise and still missed the real signal. Pre-match, CTBC Flying Oyster sat at just 36%, a reflection of the record gap and Deep Cross Gaming’s earlier 2-0 head-to-head win. But once Game 1 ended, the market swung sharply to CTBC Flying Oyster at 64% for the series, correctly recognizing that the opener had exposed a deeper problem than one lost draft.

Where the market struggled most was at individual game close. It favored Deep Cross Gaming again before Game 2, even though CTBC Flying Oyster had already shown the more reliable carry structure through Doggo and the cleaner teamfighting around objectives. In hindsight, the stronger signal was not the standings sheet; it was CTBC Flying Oyster’s ability to convert draft ideas into better mid-game execution.

Series Stats

GameWinnerDurationKillsSeries MVP Highlight
1CTBC Flying Oyster35:50CTBC Flying Oyster 33 – Deep Cross Gaming 16DoggoEzreal10/3/10
2CTBC Flying Oyster30:40CTBC Flying Oyster 25 – Deep Cross Gaming 9POUTAkali9/0/5

FAQ

Q: Why did CTBC Flying Oyster win the series despite the weaker record?

They were far better at turning small openings into permanent control, finishing the series with a combined 58-25 kill lead and dominating objectives in both games, especially the 4 dragons to 1 and 2 barons to 0 edge in Game 1.

Q: Which prediction mattered most in CTBC Flying Oyster vs Deep Cross Gaming?

The call on Doggo mattered most, because his Ezreal in Game 1 delivered the exact carry route the preview highlighted, while the live draft model only partially held up by missing Game 1 and correctly favoring CTBC Flying Oyster in Game 2.

*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-07-26 13:06 UTC.*