← Blog
Series

GAM Esports 3-1 Deep Cross Gaming — LCP 2026 Results & Stats

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

GAM Esports beat Deep Cross Gaming 3-1 in LCP 2026. Full series recap: drafts, gold timelines, player stats and odds history.

Deep Cross GamingDeep Cross Gaming
Series13
GAM EsportsGam EsportsWinner
G1Deep Cross Gaming41:32
G2Gam Esports24:48
G3Gam Esports52:10
G4Gam Esports29:30
Polymarket — Trajectorymarket across the series · Deep Cross Gaming · GAM Esports
Pre-match
series · before Game 1
43%·57%
G1 · draft closeCOIN FLIP
game marketDeep Cross Gaming won
46%·55%
After G1
series · market reaction
64%·37%
G2 · draft closeFAVORITE
game marketGAM Esports won
44%·56%
After G2
series · market reaction
46%·55%
G3 · draft closeCOIN FLIP
game marketGAM Esports won
48%·53%
After G3
series · market reaction
23%·78%
G4 · draft closeCOIN FLIP
game marketGAM Esports won
47%·53%
Final score: 1-3resolved odds omitted (0% / 100%)

TL;DR: GAM Esports answered Deep Cross Gaming’s Game 1 surprise with three straight wins to take LCP 2026 3-1. DCG proved it could outlast GAM in a long opener, but GAM’s jungle control, solo-lane priority and Artemis’ late-series carry performances turned resilience into a convincing comeback.

Key Takeaways

  • Artemis was the series MVP: his Sivir went 4/1/7 in Game 2 before his flawless Caitlyn posted 9/0/7 and 89% kill participation in the Game 4 closeout.
  • The decisive moment was GAM’s Game 2 reset. After losing a 41:32 opener, GAM crushed DCG 13-1 in 24:48, with Kiaya’s Rumble finishing 4/0/2 and establishing the pressure that changed the series.
  • GAM Esports won the series 3-1, but the contrast mattered: DCG’s Game 1 win came through 2 barons, an 11-3 tower edge and 86.1k to 76.7k gold, while GAM won the next three with increasing control.

Before the Series

Polymarket made GAM Esports the 57.5% favorite against Deep Cross Gaming’s 42.5%, a view supported by GAM’s +3,841 average gold difference and stronger early-game profile. Still, HongSuo offered DCG a route into a competitive series with his 9.9 KDA and +469 GD@15, provided GAM’s Draktharr could not dictate the jungle.

The pre-draft forecast identified Vi, Orianna, Ryze, Rumble, and Ahri as pivotal. That call largely held: Ryze gave DCG its opening, Rumble and Orianna powered GAM’s response, while Vi and Ahri showed why projected priority does not always guarantee a winning game.

Game 1 — Setting the Tone

DCG turned the opening into a patient statement. Pop9’s Jarvan IV did not need kills to own the map; his 0/2/17 line and 94% KP repeatedly created engage windows for Feng’s Jhin, who finished 6/1/4. GAM’s narrow 50% draft-model edge failed to translate.

The marquee mid-lane picks delivered unevenly. HongSuo’s Ryze went 5/3/9, supplying the scaling and side-lane pressure predicted before draft. Gloryy’s Ahri produced 4/2/5 and dangerous pick chances, but could not turn them into a snowball. DCG’s 18-11 kill win was earned through objectives, not chaos.

Game 2 — The Pivot

GAM’s answer was devastatingly clean. Draktharr’s Xin Zhao went 2/0/8, denying Pop9’s Vi the initiation opportunities needed to snowball; Vi finished 0/4/0, making this the watchlist prediction that failed most clearly.

Conversely, GAM’s priority selections delivered exactly as forecast. Kiaya’s Rumble posted 4/0/2 with +577 GoldDiff@15, and Gloryy’s Orianna added 3/0/8 with +626 GoldDiff@15. GAM’s 52% model advantage became a 13-1 rout, 7 towers and 53.6k to 40.7k gold.

Game 3 — The Climax

Game 3 was the series’ endurance test, lasting 52:10. Deep Cross Gaming entered with the model’s narrow 50% edge, but GAM survived the volatile middle game and won 27-17 in kills. That result was the clearest draft-model miss of the BO5: DCG had the projected edge, yet GAM’s ability to keep finding fights prevented the long game from becoming a HongSuo-led recovery.

GAM then carried that composure into Game 4. ArtemisCaitlyn built +1193 GoldDiff@15, while Draktharr’s Wukong delivered 3/0/12. GAM’s 52% draft edge translated, ending in an 18-2 win in 29:30.

Aftermath

GAM Esports won the series 3-1 because it adjusted faster after defeat. DCG’s first-game formula required coordinated engage, map time and baron control; GAM removed that oxygen through Draktharr’s jungle pressure, Kiaya’s lane advantage and Artemis’s dependable damage. The champions flagged before the series mattered, but the larger lesson was GAM’s capacity to convert small draft edges into suffocating map states.

Polymarket Trajectory

The market began with GAM as the 57% pre-match favorite, then overreacted sharply to DCG’s opening win: DCG rose to 64% after Game 1 despite GAM having entered that game near a coin flip. GAM immediately corrected the story by winning the Game 2 matchup it was favored to win, restoring its series advantage and revealing that the opener had not erased its underlying strengths. The market was less decisive around Game 3, yet GAM’s victory there was the turning point that made the final outcome feel inevitable. The earlier signal was not a single price, but GAM’s roster profile: Draktharr could neutralize DCG’s jungle setups, while Artemis gave GAM a more reliable late-series carry condition.

Series Stats

GameWinnerDurationKillsSeries MVP Highlight
1Deep Cross Gaming41:32Deep Cross Gaming 18 – GAM Esports 11Pop9 Jarvan IV 0/2/17
2GAM Esports24:48Deep Cross Gaming 1 – GAM Esports 13Artemis Sivir 4/1/7
3GAM Esports52:10Deep Cross Gaming 17 – GAM Esports 27GAM Esports teamfighting 27 kills
4GAM Esports29:30Deep Cross Gaming 2 – GAM Esports 18Artemis Caitlyn 9/0/7

FAQ

Q: Why did GAM Esports win the series 3-1 after losing Game 1?

GAM responded with three straight victories, beginning with a 13-1 Game 2 where Kiaya and Gloryy built +577 and +626 GoldDiff@15.

Q: How could Deep Cross Gaming have changed the series?

DCG needed Pop9’s Vi to create the same coordinated engage value he found on Jarvan IV, but the 0/4/0 Game 2 performance stopped that recovery path.

*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-08-13 13:07 UTC.*