Solary 3-1 G2 NORD — EMEA Masters 2026 Results & Stats

TL;DR: Piero was the spine of Solary’s 3-1 series win over G2 NORD, averaging 7.9 KDA across Renata Glasc, Nautilus and Lulu. After a chaotic opener and a sharp G2 NORD response, Solary steadied the series with two increasingly decisive wins, turning Piero’s support into the foundation for a controlled finish.

Key Takeaways

• Piero was Solary’s series MVP, averaging 7.9 KDA across Renata Glasc, Nautilus and Lulu as the team shaped fights around his presence.
• The biggest swing came in Game 3: Solary won 13-3 in 26:30, recovering from the Game 2 loss with the series’ clearest display of control.
• Solary won the series 3-1. Game 1 was a 30-30 kill deadlock, while the final two wins gave G2 NORD just 10 combined kills.

Before the Series

Solary entered the EMEA Masters 2026 Season Summer Main Event as the clear market favourite: the pre-match series price stood at 82% for Solary and 18% for G2 NORD. But a favourite’s status does not decide a best-of-five. The series would turn on whether Solary could make its advantages count when games became messy—and whether Piero could keep giving the team a dependable center.

The live draft model offered a contrasting read at the start. It favored G2 NORD at 50% in Game 1, a prediction that failed to translate into a win. Across the series, the model’s edge was finely balanced: it favored G2 NORD at 51% in Game 2, and G2 NORD won; it favored G2 NORD at 50% in Game 3, but Solary won; then it favored Solary at 51% in Game 4, and Solary delivered. The draft predictions were therefore split, not a reliable forecast of the series’ direction.

Game 1 — Setting the Tone

The opener captured the tension that would define the matchup: G2 NORD matched Solary kill for kill, but Solary found more value across the map. In 36:00, both teams reached 30 kills. Yet Solary finished with 11 towers to G2 NORD’s 4, and claimed 2 Barons to none. The difference was not a shortage of fights; it was Solary turning pressure into territory and a finish.

Kryze’s Vayne supplied an important early platform, building a +2300 GoldDiff@15 lead over Shelfmade. That advantage helped Solary threaten the map even as the kill count remained level. The draft model had leaned G2 NORD at 50%, but the result showed why a prediction edge does not guarantee control: Solary converted its lane pressure into objectives and won the game.

Game 2 — The Pivot

Solary’s 74% game price at draft close made G2 NORD’s response a genuine upset. The model, meanwhile, narrowly favored G2 NORD at 51%—and this time that prediction held. G2 NORD won 30-17, turning repeated skirmishes into a forceful equalizer.

Markoon’s Lee Sin anchored that effort with a 10.50 KDA. Solary still secured 3 dragons to G2 NORD’s 1, but the objective count could not erase the 7.1k gold deficit. A strong bot-lane start for Aetinoth’s Lucian, who held +670 GoldDiff@15, was not enough to keep the game under Solary’s control. The series stood level, and the upset shifted the question from whether Solary could lead to whether it could reset.

Game 3+ — The Climax

Solary answered emphatically. In Game 3, the model again gave G2 NORD a narrow 50% edge, but Solary won 13-3 in 26:30. The prediction failed, and the game’s lopsided kill score marked a change from the opening chaos: Solary limited G2 NORD’s opportunities while rebuilding its own momentum.

Game 4 completed the response. Solary won 19-7 in 25:20, closing the series 3-1. This time, the model’s 51% preference for Solary was borne out. Taken together, the final two games gave G2 NORD only 10 kills. That defensive control made the early 30-30 brawl feel distant and gave Piero’s series-long support performances their clearest context: Solary could shape the fights without needing every game to become a kill race.

Aftermath

The series was not a straight march from favourite to winner. Solary’s first victory came despite the model’s slight G2 NORD lean, and its second arrived only after G2 NORD overturned the game market and tied the series. The decisive response was how quickly Solary tightened the contest: the final two games lasted 26:30 and 25:20, with scores of 13-3 and 19-7.

Piero’s 7.9 KDA across three champions captures the thread connecting those outcomes. His Renata Glasc, Nautilus and Lulu gave Solary a consistent backbone as the team moved from trading blows to controlling the close. G2 NORD found a convincing answer in Game 2, but could not reproduce it. Solary’s 3-1 win rewarded adaptability as much as its favourite status.

Polymarket Trajectory

The market began with Solary strongly favoured, and the eventual 3-1 result validated that broad series outlook. But the match did not unfold as a simple confirmation: G2 NORD’s Game 2 win came when Solary was the game favourite, exposing how little a series-level price could guarantee about an individual map. The market’s sharpest recalibration followed that upset, pulling back its confidence in Solary before the team restored it with the Game 3 win. There was an earlier warning that the opening might be competitive: the live draft model gave G2 NORD a 50% edge in Game 1, even as the market favoured Solary. Across the series, the prices captured the favourite’s eventual success, but not the full volatility between games.

Series Stats

FAQ

*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-10-10 19:23 UTC.*