← Blog

LODIS Execution Overrides Pyramid IV Esports Draft Edge

By Draftlol Analysis Desk4 min read

LODIS beat Pyramid IV Esports in 36:00 at EMEA Masters 2026, overcoming a 51% draft prediction with dragon control and decisive teamfights.

GAME 2EMEA MastersSummer LCQGame 2Patch 26.18
Pyramid IV Esports
Pyramid Iv Esports
34:23
LODIS (Polish Team)
Lodis (polish Team)Winner
Polymarket · Game marketmarket probability · LODIS · Pyramid IV EsportsFAVORITE
Game (draft close)LODIS won (83% pre-game)
83%·18%
Series closed — series market analysis in the final recap.

LODIS overcame a marginal Pyramid IV Esports draft edge through dragon control and resilient teamfight execution.

MVP

Sinmivak
SinmivakOrnnOrnn

Sinmivak's 3/2/12 Ornn and 7.50 KDA gave LODIS the engage and durability to control objectives.

Verified predictions

  • Model draft prediction: Pyramid IV Esports favored at 51% Pre-match

TL;DR: LODIS defeated Pyramid IV Esports in 36:00 at EMEA Masters 2026, turning a slight draft underdog status into victory through superior objective control. Despite Czekolad falling -1425 gold behind at 15, his Annie enabled crucial fights, while Sinmivak’s Ornn anchored LODIS’s four-dragon win.

Key Takeaways

  • LODIS won the kill race 31-25 and converted that pressure into 10 towers, showing that their execution overcame Pyramid IV Esports’ projected draft edge.
  • Sinmivak delivered a 3/2/12 line and a 7.50 KDA on Ornn, giving LODIS a durable engage tool throughout the late game.
  • Czekolad trailed by -1425 gold at 15 on Annie, yet his 45% KP proved that mid-lane influence mattered more than the early personal deficit.

Trading Blows

This EM contest stayed tight from its opening skirmishes to its final push. Pyramid IV Esports found sharp answers through Akashii’s LeBlanc, whose 11/4/6 score and +1425 gold at 15 created real backline danger. LODIS, however, kept the game within reach rather than allowing that early mid advantage to snowball.

The gold total ended only 75.1k to 72.6k, a narrow 2.5k margin after 36:00. Jalleba’s Ashe fought hard in the damage race with a 9/7/3 line, but LODIS consistently found more room to turn picks into map progress. Each side claimed 1 barons, making the difference less about one miraculous objective steal and more about repeated control of the map.

The Deciding Factor

The decisive factor was LODIS’s dragon setup. They secured 4 dragons to 1, forcing Pyramid IV Esports to approach the river on increasingly uncomfortable terms. That denied the ideal terrain for Ashe-Seraphine scaling and made every contested entrance vulnerable to a Qiyana flank or Ornn engage.

mikusik’s Qiyana produced a fearless 13/6/7 performance, repeatedly creating the chaos that LODIS needed around objectives. His pressure paired effectively with Annie despite the mid laner’s early gold deficit; the duo’s model-listed 58.6% synergy became meaningful when teamfights mattered most.

What Made the Difference

The pre-game model gave Pyramid IV Esports a 51% chance, based on their scaling bot lane, Jarvan IV engage, and LeBlanc’s ability to punish isolated carries. That slight draft edge did not materialize in-game. LODIS prevented the clean, front-to-back fights the red side wanted, then used their stronger objective rhythm to make Pyramid IV Esports react.

zamulek’s Lucian finished 12/4/6 with +1289 gold at 15, supplying the follow-up damage whenever LODIS started a fight. Meanwhile, Kaseko’s Milio added 1/7/21, helping the carries survive the return burst. The result was a composed win built on dragons, 10 towers to 5, and better fight selection.

Polymarket Market

Polymarket priced LODIS at 82% before the game, against 18% for Pyramid IV Esports, and the favourite delivered. The market correctly identified that LODIS had the more reliable path to victory despite the live draft model’s 51% lean toward Pyramid IV Esports. The draft forecast saw the scaling and engage available to the losing side, but execution revealed the limitation: they could not secure river control long enough to deploy it. LODIS’s 4 dragons to 1, coupled with a 31-25 kill lead, showed why practical game control outweighed a marginal composition advantage. This result closes the series (), and the full series-market wrap-up belongs in the series recap.

FAQ

Q: Why did LODIS win despite Pyramid IV Esports receiving a 51% draft prediction?

LODIS controlled the objective game with 4 dragons to 1 and converted their 31-25 kill edge into 10 towers, denying Pyramid IV Esports the setup their scaling composition required.

Q: What was the key pick in LODIS’s victory?

Sinmivak’s Ornn was central, recording a 3/2/12 score and 7.50 KDA while providing the reliable engage that enabled LODIS’s decisive fights.

*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-09-21 19:22 UTC.*