Anubis Gaming 3-2 Ruddy Corporation — EMEA Masters 2026 Results & Stats
Anubis Gaming beat Ruddy Corporation 3-2 in EMEA Masters 2026. Full series recap: drafts, gold timelines, player stats and odds history.


Market path
Higher = better for Anubis Gaming
Dropped to 65% after game 4, then recovered to win 3-2.
- G1 draftwon69%
- G2 draftwon76%
- G3 draftlost75%
- G4 draftlost63%
- G5 draftwon65%
Giyuu’s consistency anchored Anubis as Ruddy’s comeback pushed the BO5 to a decisive Game 5.
MVP
13/1/11 in Game 1; 9.0 KDA average across Orianna, Ahri, and Anivia
Verified predictions
- Live draft model favored Ruddy Corporation 51% in Game 1; Ruddy lost. Pre-match
- Live draft model favored Ruddy Corporation 50% in Game 2; Ruddy lost. Pre-match
- Live draft model favored Ruddy Corporation 51% in Game 3; Ruddy won. Pre-match
- Live draft model favored Anubis Gaming 51% in Game 4; Anubis lost. Pre-match
TL;DR: Anubis Gaming won the EMEA Masters 2026 series 3-2, with Giyuu’s 9.0 KDA across Orianna, Ahri, and Anivia providing the spine of the victory. Ruddy Corporation fought back from 0-2 to force a decider, but Anubis recovered control in Game 5 and claimed the full-distance BO5.
Key Takeaways
- Giyuu averaged 9.0 KDA across Orianna, Ahri, and Anivia, giving Anubis a steady center through a series of sharp momentum swings.
- Ruddy’s 23-15 kill win in Game 4 forced Game 5, but Anubis answered in the decider with a 25-14 kill advantage and a 7-3 tower edge.
- Anubis Gaming won the series 3-2 after taking the first two games, losing the next two, then closing out the BO5; Game 1 was close at 25-14, while Game 2 ended 25-7.
Before the Series
The pre-match read leaned heavily toward Anubis Gaming, but the series would demand more than simply protecting a favorite’s lead. The live draft model favored Ruddy Corporation in both Games 1 and 2, at 51% and 50% respectively, yet Anubis won both. Those calls did not translate into results: the opening game stayed competitive, while Game 2 became a runaway.
Anubis’s early command had two distinct faces. In Game 1, Giyuu’s 13/1/11 Orianna anchored a close contest, and Anubis took 4 dragons to 0 despite Ruddy’s draft-model edge. In Game 2, maged’s Gwen supplied a powerful top-lane pressure point, while Theocacs’s Xin Zhao finished 22/1/14. The 2-0 lead put Anubis one win from the title, but it also left Ruddy with nothing to lose.
Trading Blows
Ruddy answered with a dramatic reset. The live draft model favored Ruddy again in Game 3, at 51%, and this time the prediction held: Ruddy won 20-5, turning the series from a near-finish into a contest. That result showed how quickly the matchup could change when Ruddy converted its opportunity into a decisive team performance.
The model swung the other way in Game 4, favoring Anubis at 51%. It failed to translate into a win. With elimination looming, Ruddy accelerated the game around Afriibi’s Tristana, whose 14/2/1 helped drive a 23-15 kill advantage. J3rkie Rell, at 1/1/16, supplied the engagement and follow-up that let Ruddy claim 4 dragons to 0. The 37% pre-game market chance for Ruddy made the result an upset, and the team had forced a decider.
Across those two losses, Anubis’s early 2-0 advantage dissolved. Yet Giyuu’s series-long consistency remained a thread through the swings: the team could still build its fights around a reliable mid-lane presence rather than letting the comeback erase its identity.
The Decider
Game 5 began with Ruddy ahead: Anubis trailed by about 1,809 gold at 15 minutes, with Gnar leading Olaf by 1,380 and LeBlanc ahead of Taliyah by 1,331. But lane leads did not settle the series. B Butcher’s Zilean became the safety net, finishing 2/2/17 with 76% kill participation, while maged’s Olaf recovered from the deficit to end 9/2/9.
Anubis won 25-14 and took towers 7-3 to seal the 3-2 series victory. Ruddy secured one Baron and 2 dragons, but Anubis matched the dragons and took more of the map. The decider captured the series arc: Ruddy had found answers after falling behind, but Anubis found one more response when everything was on the line.
Aftermath
Giyuu’s 9.0 KDA across three champions makes him the series’ defining performer, not because every game followed the same script, but because Anubis repeatedly had a dependable centerpiece around which to rebuild. The result marks a full-distance EMEA Masters 2026 win for Anubis Gaming, while Ruddy Corporation’s two-game surge proved the early favorite was far from untouchable.
Polymarket Trajectory
The market began at 84% for Anubis Gaming, a strong favorite that looked justified when the team went up 2-0. Ruddy’s wins in Games 3 and 4 exposed the limits of that confidence: the market favored Anubis at both drafts, including 63% in Game 4, yet Ruddy won each. The sharpest series-level repricing followed that comeback, as Anubis’s perceived chance fell from 96% after Game 2 to 65% after Game 4. The final favorite delivered, but the path there was not a clean confirmation of pre-series expectations. Ruddy’s capacity to win when the draft model or market leaned Anubis was visible before the decider; Anubis’s response in Game 5 proved more decisive than its early advantage.
Series Stats
| Game | Winner | Duration | Kills | Series MVP Highlight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Game 1 | Anubis Gaming | 37:06 | Anubis Gaming 25 – Ruddy Corporation 14 | Giyuu, Orianna, 13/1/11 |
| Game 2 | Anubis Gaming | 25:43 | Anubis Gaming 25 – Ruddy Corporation 7 | Theocacs, Xin Zhao, 22/1/14 |
| Game 3 | Ruddy Corporation | 30:31 | Anubis Gaming 5 – Ruddy Corporation 20 | Not provided |
| Game 4 | Ruddy Corporation | 31:15 | Anubis Gaming 15 – Ruddy Corporation 23 | Afriibi, Tristana, 14/2/1 |
| Game 5 | Anubis Gaming | 29:28 | Anubis Gaming 25 – Ruddy Corporation 14 | maged, Olaf, 9/2/9 |
FAQ
Q: Why did Anubis Gaming win the series?
Giyuu averaged 9.0 KDA across the series, and Anubis turned the Game 5 comeback into a 25-14 win with a 7-3 tower advantage.
Q: How did Ruddy Corporation force a fifth game?
Ruddy won Game 3 20-5, then took Game 4 23-15 in kills, including 4 dragons to 0.
*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-10-07 21:14 UTC.*