Cloud9 vs FURIA Worlds Game 2: Lee Sin’s 80% Edge
Cloud9 face FURIA at Worlds in Game 2: Blaber’s Lee Sin brings an 80% global win rate against Sejuani, but FURIA’s Olaf-led draft has answers.


TL;DR: Cloud9 face FURIA in Worlds Game 2 with the model giving Cloud9 a 55% edge to FURIA’s 45%. Blaber’s Lee Sin is the standout draft fact: he has an 80% global win rate against Sejuani over 10 games, giving Cloud9 an early skirmish opening—if he can turn that matchup into pressure before FURIA’s teamfighting takes over.
Cloud9’s Lee Sin into Sejuani is a deliberate pressure bet: Blaber has won 80% of 10 global games against the champion, and can look to disrupt Tatu’s routes before FURIA sets up. It is not a guaranteed lane-to-map advantage, though; FURIA’s Olaf and Lulu can help Guigo run through fights if Cloud9’s early lead stalls.
Compositions: Cloud9 vs FURIA
Cloud9 pair K’Sante, Lee Sin, Sylas, Caitlyn, and Bard for skirmishes, picks, and lane pressure. Caitlyn and Bard can push bot and create roam windows, while Lee Sin and Sylas want to convert early fights into a snowball. In the late game, Cloud9 need Bard’s catches and Sylas’s stolen ultimates to make space for Caitlyn; their composition is less comfortable if FURIA reaches a front-to-back fight on even terms.
FURIA have Olaf, Sejuani, Akali, Yunara, and Lulu: a more direct engage-and-carry setup. Sejuani offers initiation, Lulu can protect Yunara, and Olaf gives the frontline a way to keep moving through crowd control. Akali adds flank threat. FURIA can contest early skirmishes, then rely on Yunara’s scaling and Lulu’s protection in extended fights.
Key Picks and Stats
In top, Thanatos’s K’Sante has a 45.2% global WR over 1396 games and 0.0% at Worlds over 3 games; his Worlds KDA is 2.5. Guigo’s Olaf is at 53.2% over 534 games and 100.0% at Worlds over 2. Olaf has a 61.0% global WR against K’Sante over 41 games, a clear historical edge for FURIA’s top side.
Jungle is Cloud9’s sharpest head-to-head angle. Blaber’s Lee Sin has a 54.7% global WR over 942 games and 66.7% at Worlds over 3; his 80.0% against Sejuani comes from 10 games. Tatu’s Sejuani has a 49.7% global WR over 153 games and 0.0% at Worlds over 1, while her record against Lee Sin is 20.0% over 10. That is meaningful matchup history, but still a small sample.
Mid is less settled: Loki’s Sylas has a 47.4% global WR over 405 games and 0.0% at Worlds over 1, with a 0.8 KDA there. Tutsz’s Akali stands at 51.6% over 674 games and 0.0% at Worlds over 1, with a 33.3% global WR against Sylas over 9. Bot favors Cloud9 in the direct matchup: Tactical’s Caitlyn is 51.9% over 884 games and 57.4% against Yunara over 108, while Ayu’s Yunara is 50.8% over 1384 and 42.6% against Caitlyn over 108. Ayu’s Worlds Yunara record is 0.0% over 2 games, with a 1.2 KDA in 1 Worlds game. Support also leans Cloud9 historically: Vulcan’s Bard is 52.7% over 1279 games and 54.6% against Lulu over 97; JoJo’s Lulu is 48.4% over 1120 and 45.4% against Bard over 97, despite a 6.0 Worlds KDA over 1 game.
The pre-draft forecast suggested Jarvan IV as a likely B1 priority, with Gnar and Corki as Cloud9 strengths and bans aimed at Yunara, Ryze, or Sion. None of those predicted champions appeared in this draft, and the listed information provides no bans to confirm. Lee Sin is the unexpected focal point: instead of the anticipated Jarvan IV route, Cloud9 have a pick with a strong Sejuani matchup record. FURIA’s Olaf is also a substantial counter-pick into K’Sante.
Draft Edge
The model’s 55%–45% Cloud9 lean reflects the Lee Sin head-to-head and Cloud9’s favorable Caitlyn–Yunara and Bard–Lulu records. FURIA, however, have the more proven champion win rates across this particular lineup, and Olaf’s 53.2% global WR plus 61.0% against K’Sante gives them a concrete top-side route. Cloud9 must use Blaber’s early tempo and bot pressure; FURIA want to absorb that pressure and bring Yunara safely into teamfights.
Polymarket Market
Polymarket prices Cloud9 at 20% and FURIA at 80% for Game 2, a stark contrast with the draft model. For the series, the market has Cloud9 at 81% and FURIA at 19% now, compared with 84%–16% about 90 minutes before the match. That is a 3-point decline for Cloud9 in the listed series percentages, while the reported pre-to-now movement is -64.5 percentage points; the figures describe sharply different snapshots, so the discrepancy should not be treated as a simple subtraction.
The market is far less optimistic about Cloud9 in this specific game than across the series: 20% in Game 2 versus 81% in the series. The completed first game, in which Cloud9 won 10–19 in kills over 39:50, adds series context but does not erase the market’s game-specific skepticism. FURIA’s Olaf and teamfight tools may explain that gap; the draft model instead emphasizes Cloud9’s lane and Lee Sin matchup edges.
Prediction
The model prediction remains Cloud9 55%, FURIA 45%, with only a slight practical lean to Cloud9: Blaber’s 80% Lee Sin record against Sejuani and the bot-lane matchup support their early-game plan, but FURIA have credible scaling and the stronger Olaf matchup. Cloud9’s Game 1 win gives them series momentum; the 20% Game 2 market price is a reminder that market expectations for this map differ sharply from the model’s draft read.
FAQ
Q: Can Blaber’s Lee Sin punish Tatu’s Sejuani early?
The matchup record favors Blaber, whose Lee Sin is 80.0% against Sejuani over 10 games. Cloud9 need to turn that history into early route pressure rather than let FURIA group around Yunara.
Q: Does Guigo’s Olaf threaten Thanatos’s K’Sante?
Yes. Olaf has a 61.0% global WR against K’Sante over 41 games, while Guigo is 100.0% at Worlds on Olaf over 2 games.
*Data: draftlol live draft model + Polymarket, draft close.*