← Blog
Live Draft Analysis

Invictus Gaming vs Xi'an Team WE: LPL Qiyana Draft Edge

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

Invictus Gaming face Xi'an Team WE in LPL Game 4, where Qiyana-Viktor synergy challenges Team WE's Olaf-Pantheon skirmish core and market surge.

Invictus GamingInvictus Gaming
Live Draft Analysis
51%·49%
PICKS
Xi'an Team WeXi'an Team WE
IGTheShy
IGTheShy
23G56.5%VS GLBOlaf
44G56.8%GLOBAL
VS LPLOlaf
1G100.0%LPL
Kled
Kled
topTOP
Olaf
Olaf
WECube
WECube
GLOBAL55.0%342G
KledVS GLB43.5%23G
LPL52.9%51G
KledVS LPL
IGWei
IGWei
19G57.9%VS GLBPantheon
242G55.8%GLOBAL
4G50.0%VS LPLPantheon
52G53.8%LPL
Qiyana
Qiyana
jungleJGL
Pantheon
Pantheon
WEMonki
WEMonki
GLOBAL46.6%1089G
QiyanaVS GLB42.1%19G
LPL46.6%131G
QiyanaVS LPL50.0%4G
IGRookie
IGRookie
45G48.9%VS GLBAnnie
769G50.3%GLOBAL
8G75.0%VS LPLAnnie
67G46.3%LPL
Viktor
Viktor
midMID
Annie
Annie
WEKaris
WEKaris
GLOBAL53.2%566G
ViktorVS GLB51.1%45G
LPL55.3%76G
ViktorVS LPL25.0%8G
IGJiaQi
IGJiaQi
7G57.1%VS GLBSivir
194G47.4%GLOBAL
2G50.0%VS LPLSivir
22G40.9%LPL
Kalista
Kalista
bottomBOT
Sivir
Sivir
WEAbout
WEAbout
GLOBAL54.3%624G
KalistaVS GLB42.9%7G
LPL60.4%91G
KalistaVS LPL50.0%2G
IGMeiko
IGMeiko
38G47.4%VS GLBKarma
707G53.7%GLOBAL
2G50.0%VS LPLKarma
95G51.6%LPL
Alistar
Alistar
supportSUP
Karma
Karma
WEErha
WEErha
GLOBAL47.3%797G
AlistarVS GLB52.6%38G
LPL56.4%94G
AlistarVS LPL50.0%2G
Invictus Gaming 51%49% Xi'an Team We
Polymarketmarket probability · Invictus Gaming · Xi'an Team WE
Game 4
64%·37%
Series *now · same market as the Game
64%·36%
Pre-matchseries · 90 min before
60%·41%
Δ Series: +4.5pp for Invictus GamingFull model: 58% / 42%

TL;DR: In LPL Game 4, Invictus Gaming are projected at 58% against Xi'an Team WE at 42%; the most citable draft fact is Invictus Gaming's Qiyana-Viktor pairing, which carries a 55.15% WR over 11.13100408104284G in the model's synergy data.

Compositions: Invictus Gaming vs Xi'an Team WE

Invictus Gaming drafted a volatile skirmish-and-teamfight composition around IGTheShy on Kled, IGWei on Qiyana, IGRookie on Viktor, IGJiaQi on Kalista, and IGMeiko on Alistar. Qiyana and Alistar give the blue side decisive engage angles, while Kled can force fights from long range. Viktor supplies late-game scaling and zone control, and Kalista can turn early objective contests into snowball opportunities.

Xi'an Team WE answer with WECube on Olaf, WEMonki on Pantheon, WEKaris on Annie, WEAbout on Sivir, and WEErha on Karma. Their draft is built to create a fast early-mid game through Olaf-Pantheon pressure, then use Annie engage and Karma shielding to deliver Sivir into front-to-back fights. Team WE have stronger straightforward poke and movement speed, but they need to avoid being trapped around Viktor's zones or Qiyana's terrain-dependent engage.

Key Picks and Stats

Kled is a strong comfort counter angle for IGTheShy: he owns a 56.8% global WR over 44G and a 100.0% LPL WR over 1G, while Kled holds a 56.5% global WR over 23G against Olaf. WECube's Olaf is still credible at a 55.0% global WR over 342G and 52.9% LPL WR over 51G, but his 43.5% global WR over 23G versus Kled makes the top-lane matchup favorable for Invictus Gaming.

The jungle matchup also leans blue. IGWei's Qiyana has a 55.8% global WR over 242G and 53.8% LPL WR over 52G, including a 57.9% global WR over 19G against Pantheon. WEMonki's Pantheon sits at just a 46.6% global WR over 1089G and 46.6% LPL WR over 131G, with a 42.1% global WR over 19G against Qiyana.

Mid is closer in raw champion form. IGRookie's Viktor has a 50.3% global WR over 769G and a weak 46.3% LPL WR over 67G, yet his 75.0% LPL WR over 8G versus Annie is a sharp lane-specific signal. WEKaris brings a 55.3% LPL WR over 76G on Annie, but only a 25.0% LPL WR over 8G against Viktor.

Kalista is the riskier blue-side pick: IGJiaQi has a 40.9% LPL WR over 22G on her. WEAbout's Sivir has a 60.4% LPL WR over 91G, although Sivir's 42.9% global WR over 7G versus Kalista suggests the matchup itself is not comfortable.

Draft Edge

Invictus Gaming have the clearer draft edge because their strongest individual matchup signals align with their preferred fighting pattern. Qiyana-Viktor offers a 55.15% WR over 11.13100408104284G, while Viktor-Kalista reaches 67.33% WR over 5.190603190982466G. The win condition is to secure river control, force terrain fights, and let Viktor punish Team WE's short-range engage.

Team WE's Olaf-Pantheon duo is dangerous at a 62.02% WR over 11.31184744666415G, giving red side a genuine early-game route. The surprise is Kalista rather than a safer scaling marksman, particularly after JiaQi's low LPL result. Last night's pre-draft analysis anticipated Invictus Gaming's higher-ceiling options and Team WE's greater flex, but the supplied final draft has no ban order or B1 record, so the expected bans and B1 calls cannot be confirmed.

Polymarket Market

Polymarket makes Invictus Gaming the 64% favorite for Game 4, versus 36% for Xi'an Team WE. The series market is even more decisive: Invictus Gaming are 80% now against Team WE's 20%, up from 60% to 40% before the match. That is a +21.0 percentage points move toward Invictus Gaming.

The Game 4 price is less optimistic for Invictus Gaming than the overall series price, implying the market sees Team WE as live in this specific draft despite expecting Invictus Gaming to win the broader contest. Olaf-Pantheon and Sivir-Karma explain that resistance, but Qiyana's favorable Pantheon matchup and the Viktor-centered synergy explain why blue remain favored.

Prediction

The model gives Invictus Gaming 58% and Xi'an Team WE 42%. I would move that slightly to 59% for Invictus Gaming because the Qiyana-Pantheon, Kled-Olaf, and Viktor-Annie matchup data all point blue, while team form favors Invictus Gaming at 0.700 to 0.500.

Series context adds volatility: Invictus Gaming won G1 18-7 in 23:30, but Team WE answered in G2 7-16 in 32:50. Team WE can still swing this game if WEMonki creates an early lead before Viktor's scaling controls objectives.

FAQ

Q: Can IGWei's Qiyana stop WEMonki's Pantheon from taking over early?

A: The numbers favor IGWei: Qiyana has a 57.9% global WR over 19G against Pantheon, while Pantheon has a 42.1% global WR over 19G against Qiyana.

Q: Is IGJiaQi's Kalista too risky against WEAbout's Sivir?

A: Kalista is the clearest risk because JiaQi has a 40.9% LPL WR over 22G, but Sivir has only a 42.9% global WR over 7G against Kalista despite About's 60.4% LPL WR over 91G.

*Data: draftlol live draft model + Polymarket, draft close.*