← Blog
Live Draft Analysis

RED Canids vs Fluxo W7M: Nautilus Risk in CBLOL

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

RED Canids face Fluxo W7M in CBLOL Game 1 as Fluxo gamble on Nautilus, a low-WR engage pick that must unlock Vi and Ahri.

RED CanidsRed Canids
Live Draft Analysis
47%·53%
PICKS
Fluxo W7mFluxo W7M
zynts
zynts
13G46.2%VS GLBRumble
301G56.1%GLOBAL
2G100.0%VS CBLOLRumble
11G36.4%CBLOL
Olaf
Olaf
topTOP
Rumble
Rumble
Zothve
Zothve
GLOBAL52.4%1219G
OlafVS GLB53.8%13G
CBLOL46.9%64G
OlafVS CBLOL0.0%2G
ZOTHVE0.0%1G
1.0 KDA
STEPZ
STEPZ
185G41.6%VS GLBVi
1374G51.9%GLOBAL
14G35.7%VS CBLOLVi
56G48.2%CBLOL
7.6 KDA
3G66.7%STEPZ
Jarvan IV
Jarvan IV
jungleJGL
Vi
Vi
Peach
Peach
GLOBAL53.4%1093G
Jarvan IVVS GLB58.4%185G
CBLOL54.8%42G
Jarvan IVVS CBLOL64.3%14G
PEACH50.0%6G
3.2 KDA
Fuuu
Fuuu
52G42.3%VS GLBAhri
503G47.3%GLOBAL
4G25.0%VS CBLOLAhri
28G60.7%CBLOL
1.3 KDA
1G0.0%FUUU
Galio
Galio
midMID
Ahri
Ahri
cody
cody
GLOBAL54.0%766G
GalioVS GLB57.7%52G
CBLOL48.6%35G
GalioVS CBLOL75.0%4G
CODY16.7%6G
4.6 KDA
Morttheus
Morttheus
111G56.8%VS GLBCorki
1405G49.8%GLOBAL
10G50.0%VS CBLOLCorki
66G47.0%CBLOL
3.8 KDA
5G40.0%MORTTHEUS
Ezreal
Ezreal
bottomBOT
Corki
Corki
BAO
BAO
GLOBAL47.0%890G
EzrealVS GLB43.2%111G
CBLOL44.2%52G
EzrealVS CBLOL50.0%10G
BAO50.0%6G
4.9 KDA
Manel
Manel
67G43.3%VS GLBNautilus
186G44.1%GLOBAL
VS CBLOLNautilus
CBLOL
Braum
Braum
supportSUP
Nautilus
Nautilus
Momochi
Momochi
GLOBAL46.6%1064G
BraumVS GLB56.7%67G
CBLOL34.3%35G
BraumVS CBLOL
MOMOCHI40.0%5G
4.0 KDA
Red Canids 47%53% Fluxo W7m
Polymarketmarket probability · RED Canids · Fluxo W7M
Game 1
59%·42%
Seriesnow
61%·40%
Pre-matchseries · 90 min before
56%·45%
Δ Series: +5.0pp for RED CanidsFull model: 62% / 38%

TL;DR: In CBLOL Game 1, RED Canids are 62% favorites over Fluxo W7M at 38%, but Fluxo’s Nautilus choice is the draft’s pressure point: it owns only a 34% CBLOL WR in 35G. Fluxo need Momochi’s engage to connect early and unlock Vi-Ahri picks before RED’s safer front-to-back setup takes over.

Compositions: RED Canids vs Fluxo W7M

RED Canids draft a stable teamfight shell: zynts on Olaf can absorb pressure, STEPZ’s Jarvan IV supplies engage, Fuuu’s Galio can roam into fights, and Morttheus on Ezreal adds safe poke beside Manel’s Braum. Their early game should revolve around Jarvan IV-Galio access to side lanes, while Ezreal gives them scaling and objective control without forcing reckless engage.

Fluxo W7M have a sharper skirmish composition. Zothve’s Rumble supplies zone control, Peach’s Vi and cody’s Ahri create a reliable pick chain, BAO’s Corki brings poke and scaling, and Momochi’s Nautilus is the primary engage button. The red side must snowball through catches around dragons; if Nautilus misses or cannot enter through Braum, Fluxo’s back line becomes vulnerable to Olaf and Jarvan IV.

Key Picks and Stats

Top lane is volatile. zynts has a 56.1% global WR over 301G on Olaf but only a 36.4% CBLOL WR over 11G; his Olaf is 100.0% versus Rumble in 2G in CBLOL, although just 46.2% over 13G globally. Zothve’s Rumble has a 52.4% global WR over 1219G and 46.9% in CBLOL over 64G, yet he is 0.0% on Rumble in CBLOL over 1G and 0.0% versus Olaf in 2G.

Jungle favors Fluxo statistically: Peach’s Vi posts a 53.4% global WR over 1093G, 54.8% in CBLOL over 42G, and a 50.0% personal WR over 6G with a 3.2 KDA. Vi is 64.3% versus Jarvan IV in 14G in CBLOL, while STEPZ has a 48.2% CBLOL WR over 56G and Jarvan IV is only 35.7% into Vi over 14G. Still, STEPZ’s personal 66.7% WR over 3G and 7.6 KDA on Jarvan IV offers upside.

Mid is another Fluxo counter-pick on paper: cody’s Ahri is 75.0% versus Galio in 4G in CBLOL, while Fuuu’s Galio is 25.0% versus Ahri in 4G. Fuuu nevertheless owns a 60.7% CBLOL WR over 28G on Galio, against cody’s 48.6% Ahri mark over 35G. Bot lane tilts toward Morttheus’s Ezreal, 56.8% versus Corki over 111G globally, while BAO’s Corki is 43.2% in that matchup. Momochi’s Nautilus, at 34.3% in CBLOL over 35G and 40.0% personally over 5G, is the risk.

Draft Edge

Last night’s forecast expected RED to prioritize Varus at B1 and Fluxo to prefer Ryze; neither prediction was confirmed, as both champions are absent from these compositions. The supplied draft does not list bans, so the expected Varus, Bard, Rakan, Jarvan IV, Renekton, and Aatrox bans cannot be verified.

Fluxo’s Rumble-Vi-Ahri core has strong duo numbers, including 57.27% for Rumble-Vi over 66.18076506107059G and 64.92% for Vi-Ahri over 48.98487286612933G. Yet RED’s Braum directly complicates the one-target engage plan, and Olaf can punish an overcommitted Nautilus. RED hold the more forgiving draft edge; Fluxo need clean early picks and Rumble ultimates around objectives.

Polymarket Market

Polymarket prices RED Canids at 58% for Game 1 and Fluxo W7M at 42%. The Series market is 57% for RED Canids and 42% for Fluxo W7M, up from 56% and 44% pre-match: RED gained 2.0 percentage points.

Game and Series prices are within 2 percentage points, indicating the deciding-map market convention: Polymarket reuses the series moneyline rather than offering a distinct per-game market. The modest RED lean fits superior Elo, a 0.730 head-to-head signal, and a 0.545 season WR, while Fluxo’s counter lanes and Vi-Ahri threat prevent a wider gap.

Prediction

The model projects RED Canids 62% to Fluxo W7M 38%, slightly above Polymarket’s 58% RED price. I would keep RED at 60%, discounting their 0.300 team-form signal but respecting Fluxo’s 0.200 form and the red side’s lane-specific counters. A successful early Vi-Ahri roam, or another weak Nautilus entry, can quickly reverse that projection.

FAQ

Q: Can Momochi’s Nautilus make Fluxo W7M’s Vi-Ahri engage work against RED Canids?

A: Yes, but it is a high-variance route: Momochi has a 34.3% CBLOL WR over 35G on Nautilus, while Peach and cody’s Vi-Ahri pairing carries a 64.92% WR over 48.98487286612933G.

Q: Why are RED Canids favored despite cody’s Ahri countering Fuuu’s Galio?

A: cody’s Ahri is 75.0% versus Galio in 4G in CBLOL, but RED combine STEPZ’s 66.7% Jarvan IV WR over 3G with Morttheus’s Ezreal, who is 56.8% versus Corki over 111G globally.

*Data: draftlol live draft model + Polymarket, draft close.*