Team WE 3-2 FlyQuest — Demacia Cup Global Invitational 2026 Results & Stats

TL;DR: Team WE answered an early setback to defeat FlyQuest 3-2 in the 2026 Demacia Cup Global Invitational. After trading emphatic wins and suffering a second market-defying loss, Team WE held firm in Game 5, turning a series that repeatedly swung away from the favorite into a hard-earned victory.

Key Takeaways

• Team WE’s 3-2 win came after FlyQuest twice upset the draft-close market favorite: first in Game 1, then again in Game 4.
• The series’ clearest on-record performance belonged to Monki on Jarvan IV in Game 3: 11/4/15, as Team WE won 27-16 and took 11 towers to 2.
• The decider ended Team WE 23 – FlyQuest 17 in 34:28. Across all five games, the teams traded lopsided wins before Team WE delivered the decisive final answer.

Before the Series

Team WE arrived with a 2W-0L event record and a pre-match Polymarket series price of 80%, while the preview cited a 79.5% chance of victory. Yet FlyQuest’s +2,519 average gold difference warned that the favorite might face real resistance. The matchup also carried a clash of early-game profiles: Gryffinn had a +292 gold difference at 15 minutes and a 10.0 KDA, while Monki’s 81.2% kill participation offered Team WE a potential way to disrupt that control.

The pre-draft champion forecast named Vi, Kalista, Lucian, Orianna, and Rumble. All appeared during the series, but the available game records don’t provide enough individual statistics to say that those five picks delivered their predicted impact. Orianna and Rumble appeared in Game 1; Kalista, Lucian, and Vi were selected in Game 2. Their presence confirmed the forecast’s picks, not its performance claims.

Trading Blows

FlyQuest struck first. Team WE had the market’s 72% game-day backing, but FlyQuest converted its 28% chance into a 24-9 win in 34:13. The model was closer than the market, narrowly favoring FlyQuest at 51%—and this time that draft edge did translate into the result. The records don’t reveal a turning point or player line, so the upset is clear without an evidence-based explanation of how it unfolded.

Team WE’s response was emphatic. In Game 2, they won 25-12 in 29:13, leveling the series and delivering on their 64% draft-close market favorite status. Game 3 extended the run: Team WE took it 27-16 in 36:21, moving ahead in the series. Here, the record gives a vivid account of the advantage: Monki’s Jarvan IV finished 11/4/15, About’s Ashe went 7/0/11, and Team WE built a 12.3k gold lead, took 11 towers to 2, and secured 2 Barons. The model’s 52% lean toward Xi'an Team WE matched the winner.

That surge put Team WE one win from the title, but FlyQuest refused to fold. They took Game 4 24-9 in 41:54, tying the series and forcing a decider. This result ran against the live draft model, which had favored Xi'an Team WE at 52%. In short, the model’s lean held in Games 1 and 3, but failed in Game 4; the supplied information can’t establish which in-game factor overcame it.

The Decider

Game 5 turned the series into a final test of composure. Team WE won 23-17 in 34:28, completing the 3-2 comeback after FlyQuest had twice taken the lead. The draft-close market favored Team WE at 60%, and this time the favorite delivered. The available record provides no player lines or objective totals for the decider, so it cannot support claims about a particular champion, play, or individual deciding the finish.

Aftermath

The difference between the teams was not a clean sweep of momentum but Team WE’s ability to answer each setback. FlyQuest’s Game 1 upset denied the favorite an easy start; its Game 4 win erased Team WE’s series lead. But Team WE won the next game both times it needed to close the contest, and the final 3-2 score reflects a series decided across five games—not a one-sided march.

The player standout supported by the record is Monki, whose Game 3 11/4/15 line and pressure on Jarvan IV helped produce the series’ most decisive statistical win. That doesn’t establish a series-wide MVP: comparable player statistics are unavailable for most games. It does, however, mark the clearest individual performance in the evidence provided.

Polymarket Trajectory

The market began with Team WE as a strong 80% series favorite, a view that understated how often FlyQuest could disrupt the expected script. FlyQuest’s Game 1 win cut Team WE’s series price sharply, but Team WE’s consecutive victories in Games 2 and 3 restored confidence in the favorite. Game 4 then exposed the limits of that renewed certainty: despite the market and draft model both leaning Team WE, FlyQuest forced the decider. Team WE’s pre-series event record supported the favorite’s case, while FlyQuest’s +2,519 average gold difference offered an earlier warning that the matchup might be more competitive than the headline odds suggested. The market ultimately favored Team WE correctly on the series winner, but twice misread the individual game result.

Series Stats

FAQ

*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-10-13 12:47 UTC.*