← Blog
Series

FURIA 2-0 Fluxo W7M — CBLOL 2026 Results & Stats

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

FURIA beat Fluxo W7M 2-0 in CBLOL 2026. Full series recap: drafts, gold timelines, player stats and odds history.

Fluxo W7MFluxo W7m
Series02
FURIAFuriaWinner
G1Furia28:20
G2Furia33:30
Polymarket — Trajectorymarket across the series · Fluxo W7M · FURIA
Pre-match
series · before Game 1
25%·76%
G1 · draft closeFAVORITE
game marketFURIA won
31%·69%
After G1
series · market reaction
11%·90%
G2 · draft closeFAVORITE
game marketFURIA won
29%·71%
Final score: 0-2resolved odds omitted (0% / 100%)

TL;DR: FURIA swept Fluxo W7M 2-0 in CBLOL 2026 by converting modest draft advantages into complete map control. JoJo anchored both wins, while Fluxo W7M early individual leads never became the decisive carry performances needed to challenge FURIA’s coordination.

FURIA won the series 2-0 without conceding a game, turning a forecast built on reliable form and jungle strength into a statement of composure. Fluxo W7M showed isolated signs of life, but FURIA consistently made the better team decisions once each map reached its pivotal phase.

Key Takeaways

  • JoJo was the series MVP: his Bard went 1/1/10 with 100% KP in Game 1, then his deathless Karma delivered 0/0/14 and a 14.00 KDA in Game 2. FURIA always had either the catch or protection required to finish fights.
  • The decisive swing came after Fluxo W7M early Game 1 mid advantage. cody’s Ryze held +919 GoldDiff@15, yet FURIA’s coordinated response turned the game into a 57.8k to 47.8k gold finish and an 11-6 kill score.
  • The pre-match Polymarket line of Fluxo W7M 24% versus FURIA 76% was vindicated. FURIA then won both draft-close favorite spots, and the final 2-0 reflected two games that became increasingly controlled rather than a narrow escape.

Before the Series

The pre-series case for FURIA centered on its 17W-8L record, first-place standing, and a more dependable jungle-led identity. Fluxo W7M route to overturning the 24.5% vs 75.5% prediction depended on BAO transforming an early edge into a true carry performance. That opportunity never fully arrived.

The draft forecast correctly identified Ryze and Ambessa as champions capable of shaping the series, but their appearances produced a useful reminder: a strong meta pick is not automatically a winning condition. FURIA’s more coherent responses made the difference.

Game 1 — Setting the Tone

Game 1 began with the narrowest of model edges—FURIA at 51%—but the result showed how meaningful a small advantage can become when a team executes its composition cleanly. Tatu’s Poppy punished Peach’s Naafiri entries, finishing 2/1/6, and FURIA denied Fluxo W7M the clean engage sequences it needed.

The Ryze prediction did partly deliver. cody posted a respectable 3/1/2 and his +919 GoldDiff@15 proved the pick gave Fluxo W7M early leverage. But Ryze never became the map-warping carry the underdogs required. Guigo’s Jayce answered with +849 GoldDiff@15, while Ayu’s Ezreal supplied 5/1/3 and +664 GoldDiff@15. FURIA’s mid-game movement turned those separate advantages into a crushing 10k gold lead.

Game 2 — The Pivot

With the series on the line, Fluxo W7M needed a reversal; instead, FURIA made the second game an exercise in patience. The Game 2 draft model favored FURIA at 50%, and that edge translated again, even if the opening minutes were measured rather than explosive.

This time Ambessa was the highlighted pick. The prediction identified its upside, but Zothve finished 0/3/0, unable to find the engage or side-lane leverage needed to snowball. Peach’s Xin Zhao did secure +768 GoldDiff@15, echoing Game 1’s pattern of promising isolated leads that did not become team control.

FURIA’s answer was range, protection, and objective discipline. Ayu’s Caitlyn went 9/1/2, while JoJo’s Karma supplied every fight with shielding and control. Two barons converted the squeeze into a 64.2k to 54.0k gold advantage and a 14-3 final kill score in 33:30.

Aftermath

The sweep extended FURIA’s winning run to 4 and reinforced why its season profile carried so much weight before the series. The margin was not built on a single explosive lane or one miracle fight. FURIA repeatedly absorbed Fluxo W7M strongest early moments, regrouped around its support-jungle structure, and converted control into objectives.

For Fluxo W7M the loss was defined by the gap between having a lead and using it. BAO never found the decisive carry window forecast before the match, while cody and Peach each saw useful early gold positions dissolve under FURIA’s collective pressure.

Polymarket Trajectory

The market’s series read was accurate from the outset: FURIA entered as the clear favorite at 76%, reflecting the same season-long reliability visible on the Rift. The more telling movement came after Game 1, when FURIA’s commanding conversion pushed its series outlook to 90%. That was not merely a reaction to a single defeat for Fluxo W7M it recognized the recurring structural issue exposed in the opener.

The draft-close prices also gave FURIA a stronger position in both games, though neither game began as a certainty. The early signal was FURIA’s ability to neutralize Fluxo W7M predicted power picks: Ryze created a lane edge without a win, and Ambessa never found a snowball. By Game 2, the market had correctly identified that FURIA’s coordination was the series’ durable advantage.

Series Stats

GameWinnerDurationKillsSeries MVP Highlight
Game 1FURIA28:20Fluxo W7M 6 – FURIA 11JoJo Bard 1/1/10, 100% KP
Game 2FURIA33:30Fluxo W7M 3 – FURIA 14JoJo Karma 0/0/14, 14.00 KDA

FAQ

Q: Why did FURIA win the series 2-0 over Fluxo W7M

FURIA converted superior coordination into decisive gold advantages of 57.8k to 47.8k and 64.2k to 54.0k, while JoJo contributed 100% KP in Game 1 and 14.00 KDA in Game 2.

Q: Why did Ryze and Ambessa not change the series for Fluxo W7M

cody’s Ryze earned +919 GoldDiff@15, but FURIA denied the follow-up map control; Zothve’s Ambessa finished 0/3/0, never gaining the engage or split-push leverage needed to snowball.

*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-08-09 19:27 UTC.*