ON’s Perfect Lulu Anchors Bilibili’s Worlds 2026 Series Win
ON went 0/0/12 on Lulu as Bilibili Gaming overwhelmed Hanwha Life Esports, taking Game 2 and closing the Worlds 2026 series 2-0.


ON’s deathless Lulu anchored Bilibili Gaming’s slow, objective-led series-clinching win.
MVP
ON went 0/0/12, anchoring BLG's objective-led win with a 4-1 dragon edge.
Verified predictions
- Live draft model favored Bilibili Gaming at 51%. Pre-match
TL;DR: Facing elimination after losing Game 1, Hanwha Life Esports needed a response, but ON’s 0/0/12 Lulu anchored Bilibili Gaming’s patient, objective-led win. BLG claimed 4 dragons to 1 and built a 14k gold lead, turning a close draft prediction into a one-sided Game 2 that closed the Worlds series.
Key Takeaways
- ON finished 0/0/12, a 12.00 KDA that made Lulu’s protection a foundation for Bilibili Gaming’s clean fights.
- Bin went 4/0/5 on Olaf and held a +545 GoldDiff@15, helping BLG take control of the top side.
- Bilibili Gaming won 14-3 in kills and finished 14.3k gold ahead, converting its lead into 10 towers and the series win.
Building the Lead
With Hanwha Life Esports one game from elimination, the stakes were simple: win or leave Worlds. Instead, Bilibili Gaming slowly tightened its grip. The draft model gave BLG a narrow 51% edge, but the game did not turn on prediction alone. Pantheon into Skarner proved a decisive surprise, while Lulu’s protection helped BLG withstand Caitlyn’s favorable lane history against Yunara.
ON’s play was the quiet center of the advance. Lulu dealt only 7.2% of BLG’s damage, but her 12 assists and 0 deaths meant she could keep teammates alive without surrendering a shutdown. Meanwhile, Olaf pressed the advantage: Bin’s 4/0/5 record and +545 lead at 15 minutes reflected pressure that Hanwha struggled to answer.
The Numbers Tell the Story
This was attrition, not a sudden burst. Over 32:50, BLG widened the gap to 67.7k gold against Hanwha’s 53.4k, a difference of 14.3k. The objective count explains how that advantage became so difficult to reverse: BLG secured 4 dragons to 1, claimed the only Baron, and took 10 towers while Hanwha took none.
Knight supplied the sharpest damage, finishing 7/0/2 on Locke with 24.3% of team damage. Xun’s Pantheon added a deathless 3/0/3, while Hanwha’s Caitlyn was left with 2/2/1 despite contributing 27.9% of her team’s damage. The imbalance was not simply about kills; BLG controlled the map and denied Hanwha the structures needed to recover.
The Final Push
The final margin made the slow squeeze unmistakable: BLG had 14 kills to Hanwha’s 3, with no towers conceded and no Baron needed for Hanwha to contest. Lulu’s safety net allowed the carries to play forward, and each dragon further narrowed Hanwha’s options. The 51% draft forecast did materialize in-game, though the result came through coordinated execution and objective control rather than draft odds alone. Bilibili Gaming closed Game 2 and completed the series.
Polymarket Market
At draft close, the game market gave Bilibili Gaming 48% against Hanwha Life Esports’ 52%—a near coin flip that favored Hanwha slightly. BLG’s win shows the market did not anticipate how thoroughly its draft answers and execution would control the map: the eventual 14.3k gold gap and 4-1 dragon count were far from a close finish. Before the series, the market had already leaned toward BLG’s opponent, pricing Hanwha at 58% and BLG at 42%, but this game reinforced BLG’s strength. This result closes the series, Hanwha Life Esports 0-2 Bilibili Gaming; the full series-market wrap-up belongs in the series recap.
FAQ
Q: How did ON’s Lulu shape the deciding game?
ON finished 0/0/12, keeping BLG’s carries supported through fights and contributing to a 4-1 dragon advantage.
Q: Did Bilibili Gaming’s draft edge translate into a win?
Yes. The model favored BLG at 51%, and its Pantheon, Olaf, and Lulu composition helped secure a 14-3 kill score and a 14.3k gold lead.
*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-10-31 23:44 UTC.*