Kaufland Hangry Knights 3-1 Eintracht Spandau — Prime League 1st Division 2026 Results & Stats
Kaufland Hangry Knights beat Eintracht Spandau 3-1 in Prime League 1st Division 2026. Full series recap: drafts, gold timelines, player stats and odds history.
Eintracht Spandau
Kaufland Hangry KnightsWinnerTL;DR: Kaufland Hangry Knights won the Prime League 1st Division playoff series 3-1 over Eintracht Spandau after entering with only a 26% market chance. Their sharper early-game coordination, led by Densi, survived Spandau’s Game 2 reset and turned three market upsets into a defining 2026 statement.
Key Takeaways
- Densi was the series MVP: his Naafiri opened with 3/0/1, +875 GoldDiff@15, and all 4 team kills in Game 1, while his Game 4 Sejuani posted 2/0/18 and a 20.00 KDA.
- The decisive moment came in Game 4, when Boda’s Renekton built +1393 GoldDiff@15 and finished 10/1/7; Kaufland Hangry Knights converted that top-side break into 26-6 kills and 4 dragons to 0.
- Kaufland Hangry Knights won the series 3-1 despite starting at 26% pre-match. The draft model correctly backed them in Game 1 at 51% and Game 3 at 50%, while Eintracht Spandau’s Game 4 52% edge failed to translate.
Before the Series
The pre-series expectation pointed firmly toward Eintracht Spandau, who held 74% to Kaufland Hangry Knights’ 26% on Polymarket. Spandau had the pedigree and the perceived scaling tools, but Hangry Knights played the series as if that call did not exist. Their plan was not to wait for a late-game miracle; it was to seize the map before Spandau’s compositions could settle.
Game 1 — Setting the Tone
Game 1 made that intent unmistakable. Kaufland Hangry Knights won in 21:00, taking the kills 4-0 even though the gold was only 36.8k to 35.4k. Densi’s Naafiri controlled every early opening, while Abbedagge’s Orianna went 1/0/3 with +825 GoldDiff@15 and helped secure a 3-0 dragon edge.
The live draft model’s 51% lean toward Kaufland Hangry Knights held, but the market had favored Spandau at 60%. That disconnect mattered: Spandau’s Sivir and Azir scaling never received enough time or river control to become the series’ safety net.
Game 2 — The Pivot
Eintracht Spandau answered exactly as a favorite should. The live draft model gave them 51%, the market gave them 58%, and both calls held as they won 20-10 in 30:50. Xagog’s Jarvan IV delivered 5/1/14 and a 19.00 KDA, repeatedly forcing the engage that had been absent in Game 1.
The telling contrast was bot lane. FUN k3y’s Jhin finished 3/0/11 with 70% kill participation despite -1330 gold@15, while Unforgiven’s Caitlyn could not turn his +1330 early advantage into a winning map. Spandau’s 10 towers announced a real reset, not a cosmetic equalizer.
Game 3 — The Climax
The tie seemed to restore Spandau’s control, yet Game 3 became the series’ clearest warning. The official record shows a strange 2:40 duration, 4.8k to 4.6k gold, and 0 kills, towers, dragons, and barons for both teams. Behind that compressed record, however, Hangry Knights found the cohesion that mattered.
Abbedagge’s Hwei produced 4/2/14 and a 9.00 KDA despite -887 GoldDiff@15, while Doss’s Braum reached 1/1/20 and a 21.00 KDA. The model’s narrow 50% edge for Kaufland Hangry Knights translated into victory; the market’s 62% preference for Spandau did not.
Aftermath
Game 4 removed any remaining ambiguity. Eintracht Spandau received a 52% draft-model edge through Trundle, Ahri, and Bard, but this was the prediction that failed. Jenax’s Dr. Mundo fell -1393 behind at 15 minutes, and Hangry Knights’ engage relentlessly denied Spandau a reset.
With Abbedagge’s Sylas adding 5/2/13, Hangry Knights built a 59.8k to 46.4k gold lead, took 8 towers to 2, 4 dragons to 0, and 1 barons to 0. Their 26-6 Game 4 victory in 30:10 completed a 3-1 series win built on execution rather than reputation.
Polymarket Trajectory
Polymarket began with Eintracht Spandau at 74%, a verdict that looked increasingly fragile once Kaufland Hangry Knights won Game 1 from a 40% draft-close chance. Spandau’s Game 2 response briefly restored market confidence, and the post-game series swing back to 65% suggested the opening upset had been treated as an exception. It was not. Hangry Knights then overturned another underdog price in Game 3 and entered the final game with the market finally recognizing their momentum. Yet Game 4 still favored Spandau at draft close, despite the earlier signal: Hangry Knights’ jungle-mid coordination had repeatedly converted playable drafts into objective control. The market read Spandau’s Game 2 strength correctly, but underestimated the roster’s ability to sustain it.
Series Stats
| Game | Winner | Duration | Kills | Series MVP Highlight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Game 1 | Kaufland Hangry Knights | 21:00 | Eintracht Spandau 0-4 Kaufland Hangry Knights | Densi Naafiri 3/0/1 |
| Game 2 | Eintracht Spandau | 30:50 | Eintracht Spandau 20-10 Kaufland Hangry Knights | Xagog Jarvan IV 5/1/14 |
| Game 3 | Kaufland Hangry Knights | 2:40 | Not recorded | Doss Braum 1/1/20 |
| Game 4 | Kaufland Hangry Knights | 30:10 | Eintracht Spandau 6-26 Kaufland Hangry Knights | Boda Renekton 10/1/7 |
FAQ
Q: Why did Kaufland Hangry Knights win the series over Eintracht Spandau?
Their jungle-mid core created earlier objective control across the series, highlighted by Densi’s Game 1 3/0/1 and Game 4 2/0/18 performances.
Q: How could Eintracht Spandau have changed the series?
Spandau needed to reproduce Game 2’s proactive engage, when Xagog’s Jarvan IV posted 5/1/14 and the team took 10 towers; Game 4 instead ended 26-6 for Kaufland Hangry Knights.
*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-08-26 18:48 UTC.*
In This Series