Ninjas in Pyjamas.CN 2-1 Weibo Gaming — LPL 2026 Results & Stats

TL;DR: NIPPhotic was the backbone of Ninjas in Pyjamas.CN’s 2-1 LPL victory over Weibo Gaming, averaging a 9.7 KDA across Jhin, Kog'Maw, and Ashe. His dependable carry play gave NIP a center of gravity through three radically different games and decided a series that repeatedly swung in momentum.

Ninjas in Pyjamas.CN won the series 2-1 over Weibo Gaming in the LPL 2026 Season Split 3, surviving WBG’s Game 2 recovery before imposing their scaling identity in the decider. The result belonged to NIPPhotic, whose calm backline output let NIP bend the entire BO3 around its strongest constant.

Key Takeaways

• NIPPhotic earned series MVP honors with a 9.7 KDA, going flawless in Game 1 on Jhin at 5/0/7 and again in Game 3 on Ashe at 6/0/10.
• The decisive pivot was Weibo Gaming’s Game 2 upset: facing 42% draft-close odds, WBG won 16-6 in 30:40, forcing NIP to prove its Game 1 control was not enough.
• Ninjas in Pyjamas.CN closed the 2-1 series with a 16-4 Game 3 rout after the first two games split sharply, 22-10 for NIP and 16-6 for WBG.

Before the Series

The pre-match view already gave Ninjas in Pyjamas.CN the edge at 57%, but this was not supposed to be a simple march. Weibo Gaming had enough individual threat to punish an uneven draft or a loose early game, particularly through WBGXiaohao. NIP’s answer was clearer: protect the carries, create reliable engage, and let NIPPhotic turn stable positioning into game-defining damage.

Game 1 — Setting the Tone

NIP established that formula immediately. NIPfengyue’s Nautilus finished 1/2/17 with 82% KP, repeatedly turning messy skirmishes into favorable fights. Alongside NIPGuwon’s Qiyana at 6/2/8, those engages gave NIPPhotic the freedom to remain untouched on Jhin.

The 22-10 kill score at 35:50 told only part of the story. NIP’s 75.5k to 64.1k gold lead, 10 towers to 4, 4 dragons to 2, and 2 barons showed a team converting every opening into permanent map control. Weibo Gaming’s WBGXiaohao fought back on Naafiri at 5/3/3, but WBG never found enough room to set up its Xerath poke.

Game 2 — The Pivot

Weibo Gaming refused to let the opener become the whole story. After falling behind in the series, WBG overturned the market’s 42% Game 2 expectation with a composed 16-6 win. WBGMoham’s immaculate 0/0/12 Milio gave his carries a safety net, while WBGXiaohu transformed a -244 GoldDiff@15 into a 7/2/3 Locke performance full of pick pressure.

NIP had signs of strength—NIPGuwon posted 3/1/3 on Trundle, and NIPHOYA held +563 GoldDiff@15 on Varus—but neither advantage became a map-wide snowball. WBG instead controlled the recovery, finishing 63.7k to 54.3k in gold. The series was level, and NIP’s Game 1 blueprint suddenly needed a stronger final act.

Game 3 — The Climax

NIP found it through scaling and discipline. The Ashe-Seraphine lane gave NIPPhotic and NIPfengyue both protection and engage, while NIPGuwon’s 3/0/5 Xin Zhao denied the explosive openings Weibo Gaming wanted from Lee Sin.

Once NIP’s composition came online, the decider became one-sided. NIPPhotic contributed to every NIP kill at 6/0/10, and NIPfengyue added 1/2/14 on Seraphine. NIP finished with 67.5k to 51.2k gold, 10 towers to 1, 2 dragons, and 1 baron. WBGXiaohao found 2/3/2, but two kills could not disrupt a composition built to absorb pressure and return it decisively.

Aftermath

This League of Legends series showed why a reliable carry matters across a BO3. Weibo Gaming demonstrated real resilience in Game 2, but NIP had the more repeatable win condition: front-to-back structure around NIPPhotic. When the series reached its highest-pressure game, Ninjas in Pyjamas.CN did not need chaos; they needed their star to scale, and he delivered.

Polymarket Trajectory

Polymarket’s pre-match 57% lean toward Ninjas in Pyjamas.CN ultimately identified the stronger series side, but the route was far less straightforward than the final result suggests. Game 1 pushed NIP’s series outlook sharply upward because its engage and carry structure looked repeatable. The market then misread Game 2, where Weibo Gaming won despite entering at 42%, exposing that NIP’s favored draft alone could not guarantee clean execution. By the decider, the market had correctly returned to NIP as the favorite. The earlier signal was NIPPhotic: even during the Game 2 loss, NIP’s roster still had a clear scaling focal point, while WBG needed another near-perfect coordinated recovery.

Series Stats

FAQ

*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-08-13 10:07 UTC.*