← Blog
Series

G2 Esports 3-1 Karmine Corp — LEC 2026 Results & Stats

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

G2 Esports beat Karmine Corp 3-1 in LEC 2026. Full series recap: drafts, gold timelines, player stats and odds history.

Karmine CorpKarmine Corp
Series13
G2 EsportsG2 EsportsWinner
G1G2 Esports33:45
G2G2 Esports34:28
G3Karmine Corp28:12
G4G2 Esports26:28
Polymarket — Trajectorymarket across the series · Karmine Corp · G2 Esports
Pre-match
series · before Game 1
49%·52%
G1 · draft closeUPSET
game marketG2 Esports won
56%·45%
After G1
series · market reaction
32%·69%
G2 · draft closeCOIN FLIP
game marketG2 Esports won
47%·54%
After G2
series · market reaction
13%·88%
G3 · draft closeUPSET
game marketKarmine Corp won
43%·57%
After G3
series · market reaction
28%·73%
G4 · draft closeUPSET
game marketG2 Esports won
59%·42%
Final score: 1-3resolved odds omitted (0% / 100%)

TL;DR: G2 Esports won the LEC 2026 Summer Playoffs series 3-1 over Karmine Corp because Hans Sama gave their compositions a dependable carry core, while G2 repeatedly converted jungle pressure and objective control into wins. Karmine Corp’s Game 3 rout proved their ceiling, but not their consistency.

G2 Esports won the series 3-1, bending the BO5 around Hans Sama’s 8.1 KDA across Ezreal, Yunara, and Xayah. His steady threat let G2 survive early deficits, punish flawed drafts, and close whenever the map opened.

Key Takeaways

  • Hans Sama was the series MVP: his 12/1/6 Yunara in Game 2 built from a +1760 gold difference at 15, while his Game 4 Miss Fortune went 4/0/5 to finish the job.
  • The decisive swing was Game 2, when SkewMond’s Jarvan IV went 4/2/11 and helped secure 2 barons; G2’s 22-14 kill win turned a competitive opening into a 2-0 lead.
  • G2 Esports won 3-1, but the series was volatile: Karmine Corp smashed Game 3 14-1, while G2 answered with 23-11, 22-14, and 13-6 kill victories in the other games.

Before the Series

The pre-match case for G2 centered on Caps’ improving form despite a -206 gold difference at 15 and SkewMond’s 78.3% kill participation. That recovery route materialized through ganks, roams, and carries rather than clean early lanes.

The pre-draft forecast was partly right. Orianna, Vi, Rumble, Ashe, and Jarvan IV all appeared. Vi created Game 1 pressure but her 4/6/4 could not convert Karmine Corp’s lead; Orianna controlled Game 2 but could not protect scaling. Jarvan IV and Rumble delivered for G2, while Ashe could not reverse Game 4.

Game 1 — Setting the Tone

Karmine Corp had the live-model edge at 50%, yet G2 won 23-11 in 33:50. Yike’s Vi held +1131 gold at 15, but SkewMond’s Xin Zhao overcame -1131 to finish 7/2/6. With 5 dragons to 0 and 2 barons to 0, G2 established that early gold would not dictate this series.

Game 2 — The Pivot

The Game 2 model favored G2 at 51%, and this was the one draft edge that translated cleanly. Hans Sama’s Yunara created a bot-lane collapse Karmine Corp never repaired, while Caps and SkewMond made every later fight accessible. G2 finished with 71.6k to 60.3k gold, 9 towers to 2, and a commanding series position.

Game 3 — The Climax

G2 entered Game 3 with a 52% draft-model edge and failed completely to turn it into Rift control. Facing elimination, Karmine Corp found their best version: Yike’s Qiyana posted 3/1/7, +1450 gold at 15, and 71% kill participation, while kyeahoo’s Ryze went 5/0/4. Their 14-1 demolition exposed how quickly G2’s setup could collapse when jungle tempo belonged to Karmine Corp.

Aftermath

Game 4 tested G2’s composure one final time. Karmine Corp held a 52% live-model advantage, but G2 won 13-6 in 26:30. BrokenBlade’s flawless Rumble finished 3/0/6, and Hans Sama’s Miss Fortune supplied the safe finishing damage. G2 denied the scaling back line they had been warned about and closed with 4 dragons.

Polymarket Trajectory

Polymarket began close, pricing G2 Esports at 52% before the series, then reacted sharply when Game 1 pushed G2 to 68%. That response correctly recognized G2’s growing control after their first two wins, but the market repeatedly underestimated their ability to win from uncomfortable draft positions. G2’s Game 1 victory came despite a 44% draft-close chance, and Game 4 repeated the pattern after Karmine Corp were favored at draft close. The market did correctly identify Karmine Corp’s Game 3 as a live threat, even though it still favored G2. The earlier signal was G2’s roster flexibility: SkewMond could recover map access, while Hans Sama ensured their late fights retained a decisive damage source.

Series Stats

GameWinnerDurationKillsSeries MVP Highlight
Game 1G2 Esports33:50Karmine Corp 11 – G2 Esports 23Labrov Karma 9.50 KDA
Game 2G2 Esports34:30Karmine Corp 14 – G2 Esports 22Hans Sama Yunara 12/1/6
Game 3Karmine Corp28:20Karmine Corp 14 – G2 Esports 1Yike Qiyana 3/1/7
Game 4G2 Esports26:30Karmine Corp 6 – G2 Esports 13Hans Sama Miss Fortune 4/0/5

FAQ

Q: Why did G2 Esports win the series 3-1 over Karmine Corp?

G2 converted objective control in three games, including 5 dragons to 0 and 2 barons to 0 in Game 1, while Hans Sama consistently gave them carry damage.

Q: Why was Jarvan IV decisive for G2 Esports?

SkewMond’s Jarvan IV went 4/2/11 in Game 2 and helped G2 secure 2 barons, preventing Karmine Corp from resetting the game.

*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-09-06 18:48 UTC.*