← Blog

SU Esports Level the Series with a Lee Sin Snowball

By Draftlol Analysis Desk4 min read

Facing elimination, SU Esports overwhelmed Verdant in 21:30, turning Kaboom’s Lee Sin lead into a 15-5 win and a 1-1 series tie in EMEA Masters.

GAME 2EMEA MastersSummer LCQBo3Game 2Patch 26.18
SU Esports
Su EsportsWinner
24:09
Verdant
Verdant
Polymarket · Game marketmarket probability · SU Esports · VerdantCOIN FLIP
Game (draft close)SU Esports won (55% pre-game)
55%·46%
Series (now)post-game · SU Esports 1-1 Verdant
64%·37%
Series (draft close)pre-game anchor
38%·63%
Δ Series after this game: +26.0pp for SU Esports

Facing elimination, SU Esports found another gear to level the series with Kaboom’s jungle snowball.

MVP

Kaboom
KaboomLee SinLee Sin

Finished 7/0/5 and built a +2537 gold lead at 15 to drive SU Esports’ 15-5 win.

Verified predictions

  • Live draft model favored SU Esports at 51%. They won — confirm whether the draft edge materialized in-game. Pre-match

TL;DR: Facing elimination after losing Game 1, SU Esports found another gear: Kaboom’s Lee Sin built a huge early lead, Vetheo’s Ahri controlled the fights, and three dragons helped fuel a 15-5 win over Verdant in 21:30. The decisive performance made it 1-1 in the EMEA Masters 2026 LCQ series.

Key Takeaways

  • Kaboom put Lee Sin +2537 gold ahead at 15, turning early jungle pressure into the engine of SU Esports’ snowball.
  • Vetheo delivered a 13.00 KDA on Ahri, anchoring the fights as Verdant’s mid lane finished 0/5/2.
  • SU Esports secured 3 dragons to 0 and ended with 40.7k to 31.2k gold, converting map control into a commanding win.

Building the Lead

The loss in Game 1 had left SU Esports one defeat from elimination. Their response was immediate and forceful: the plan was to connect Lee Sin and Alistar’s engage to their carries, and Kaboom’s early advantage made that plan hard for Verdant to disrupt. By 15 minutes, he held a +2537 gold difference, while opposing jungler Mafro was down the same amount.

That gulf turned the map into a series of uncomfortable choices for Verdant. Their composition could threaten coordinated engages and had late-fight promise through Orianna and Gangplank, but it needed time to mature. SU Esports instead pressed the advantage, claiming 3 dragons to 0 and preventing Verdant from establishing control over objectives.

The Numbers Tell the Story

The final 15-5 kill score reflected more than a lead in skirmishes: it showed how consistently SU Esports could start fights on their terms. Vetheo’s Ahri finished 4/1/9, a 13.00 KDA that captured his role as a reliable follow-up threat whenever Kaboom found an opening.

At the same time, Verdant’s damage plan struggled to come online. Sayn’s Orianna ended 0/5/2, while Mishi’s Jhin managed 2/2/3. SU Esports’ advantage reached 9.5k gold, with 40.7k to 31.2k overall, and the team took 4 towers to 0. Neither side claimed a Baron, but SU Esports did not need one to make the gap decisive.

The draft model had favored SU Esports at 51%. That narrow edge did materialize in-game, but execution was the difference between a slight prediction advantage and a rout: the early jungle lead, clean objective control, and Ahri’s fight presence all delivered on SU Esports’ direct win condition.

The Final Push

In just 21:30, SU Esports turned a survival game into a statement. The 2026 EMEA Masters result evened the series at 1-1, keeping them alive and sending the contest to a deciding game. Verdant had arrived with the series lead; now they had to recover from a loss in which their threats never found time to scale.

Polymarket Market

At draft close, the game market had SU Esports at 55% and Verdant at 46%, treating the matchup as close to a coin flip. The eventual winner matched the market’s slight lean, but the game itself was far less balanced: a +2537 jungle gold difference at 15, a 15-5 kill score, and 3-0 dragons showed how thoroughly SU Esports’ execution outpaced the near-even expectation. The series market shifted sharply after the result, moving from 38% for SU Esports at draft close to 64% afterward, while Verdant fell from 62% to 36%. That reversal makes Game 3 a test of whether Verdant can reset after losing its series advantage.

FAQ

Q: What swung Game 2 in SU Esports’ favor?

Kaboom’s +2537 gold lead at 15 helped SU Esports control the jungle and secure 3 dragons to 0.

Q: Did the draft model correctly favor SU Esports?

Yes. The model’s 51% prediction aligned with the result, though SU Esports’ decisive execution made the game much more one-sided than that narrow edge suggested.

*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-09-23 20:02 UTC.*

Next chapter · Draft G3Verdant vs SU Esports: Pyke Tests Bard in EMEA Masters G3 →