← Blog

UCAM Esports 2-0 SU Esports — EMEA Masters 2026 Results & Stats

By Draftlol Analysis Desk4 min read

UCAM Esports beat SU Esports 2-0 in EMEA Masters 2026. Full series recap: drafts, gold timelines, player stats and odds history.

SERIESEMEA MastersSummer LCQBo3
SU Esports
Su Esports
0–2
UCAM Esports
Ucam EsportsWinner
G1Ucam Esports25:29
G2Ucam Esports31:14

Market path

Higher = better for UCAM Esports

UCAM Esportswins
50%preG1
SU Esportswins
66%before G1
66%Low
92%after G1

Never fell below 66%; closed out 2-0.

Series marketGame draft
  • G1 draftwon61%
  • G2 draftwon72%
Final score:2-0

UCAM Esports turned narrow pre-game edges into a controlled 2-0 sweep of SU Esports.

Key moments

  1. 15'Kozi's Gnar built a +1511 gold@15 lead, establishing UCAM's top-side control.−1.5kUCAM Esports
  2. 25'UCAM completed Game 1 with four dragons, one baron, and a 21-6 kill lead.UCAM Esports
  3. 15'ESCIK's Viktor reached +359 GoldDiff@15 as UCAM's scaling core took shape.−0.4kUCAM Esports
  4. 31'ANDARIEL's Ezreal closed the sweep with a 7/1/12 performance in Game 2.UCAM Esports

MVP

bluerzor
bluerzorLee SinLee Sin

bluerzor's 1/0/14 Lee Sin and 71% KP set the tempo for UCAM's 2-0 sweep.

Verified predictions

  • G1 model favored UCAM Esports 50% Pre-match
  • G2 model favored UCAM Esports 51% Pre-match
  • Pre-match (series): SU Esports 34% vs UCAM Esports 66% Pre-match

TL;DR: UCAM Esports swept SU Esports 2-0 in the EMEA Masters 2026 Season Summer LCQ, turning narrow draft-model advantages into two increasingly convincing wins. bluerzor ignited Game 1 on Lee Sin, then ANDARIEL closed the series on Ezreal, establishing UCAM as the sharper team in fights, objectives, and map pressure.

UCAM Esports won the series 2-0 without dropping a game, converting a competitive pre-series expectation into a statement sweep. For SU Esports, the loss was not one collapse but a recurring inability to interrupt UCAM’s control once the first skirmishes tilted away.

Key Takeaways

  • Series MVP bluerzor set the standard with Lee Sin in Game 1, delivering 1/0/14, 71% KP, and a flawless 15.00 KDA as UCAM Esports took command of the entire series.
  • The decisive turning point came in Game 1’s top-side snowball: Kozi’s Gnar built +1511 gold@15 and finished 8/1/7, giving UCAM a frontline carry before SU could make its Vi-Ahri engage work.
  • UCAM Esports swept 2-0, winning 21-6 in 25:40 and 25-10 in 31:30; Polymarket’s 66% pre-match price on UCAM was clearly vindicated, while the series became even more one-sided after the opener.

Before the Series

The pre-match picture gave UCAM Esports a meaningful but far from overwhelming edge. Polymarket placed UCAM at 66% against SU Esports’ 34%, suggesting a favorite rather than an inevitable sweep. The live draft models were even tighter: UCAM held only 50% in Game 1 and 51% in Game 2.

Those predictions mattered because both edges translated. Neither draft forecast promised a rout, but UCAM repeatedly found the practical answers once champions reached the Rift. SU had engage tools and early-lane potential, yet UCAM’s compositions consistently punished overcommitment and created room for their carries to scale.

Setting the Tone

Game 1 became the blueprint for the sweep. UCAM’s narrow 50% draft edge translated emphatically, denying SU’s early Vi-Ahri engage while bluerzor turned Lee Sin into the series’ first great engine. His 1/0/14 line meant UCAM entered every important fight with a jungle presence SU could neither catch nor contain.

The top lane made that pressure permanent. Kozi’s Gnar transformed scaling into immediate lane authority, posting 8/1/7 and +1511 gold@15 over Renekton. With ANDARIEL adding 4/1/8 on Caitlyn, UCAM could siege safely after every successful move. The 56.8k to 44.3k gold advantage, 4 dragons to 0, 1 baron to 0, and 9 towers to 2 showed that the 21-6 score was not a series of isolated catches; it was map control with no exit route.

Sealing It

SU Esports entered Game 2 needing a reset, but UCAM instead extended the same pressure into a more chaotic and more damaging conclusion. The 51% live draft-model advantage again held, as Viktor, Ezreal, and Seraphine made each aggressive SU move costly.

SU did uncover early lane positives: Nako’s Yunara held +331 GoldDiff@15, while Patch’s Lulu had +243. But those numbers never became a comeback because UCAM’s central scaling and teamfight structure had greater map impact. ESCIK’s Viktor built +359 GoldDiff@15, and ANDARIEL became the finishing force on Ezreal, recording 7/1/12 for a 19.00 KDA.

Meanwhile, Kozi remained relentless, producing 9/2/4 on Ambessa. UCAM’s 25-10 kill win, 69.1k to 57.2k gold lead, and 10 towers to 1 confirmed that SU’s brief lane advantages could not survive the full-map test.

Aftermath

This was a sweep built on continuity. bluerzor supplied the opening-game tempo, Kozi won both top-side battles in different styles, and ANDARIEL provided the dependable late-fight damage UCAM needed to close. UCAM Esports did not merely win two drafts; they made both narrow model edges look larger through cleaner execution.

For SU Esports, a different series required converting their early Game 2 lane leads before UCAM’s scaling core assembled. Instead, UCAM consistently found the first decisive fights, then snowballed objectives and towers before SU could establish a stable comeback setup.

Polymarket Trajectory

Polymarket’s series view began with UCAM Esports as a 66% favorite, a correct read that still understated how comprehensively the matchup would unfold. The Game 1 draft-close market also favored UCAM, and the favorite delivered by turning a modest theoretical edge into a complete objective sweep. After that opening result, the market’s move to 92% for UCAM reflected more than the 1-0 score: it recognized that SU had not found a reliable answer to UCAM’s jungle-led tempo or top-side control. Game 2 again validated the favorite’s status rather than exposing a weakness in the market. The early signal was UCAM’s roster balance: bluerzor could create the first opening, while Kozi and ANDARIEL gave the team multiple win conditions once fights expanded.

Series Stats

GameWinnerDurationKillsSeries MVP Highlight
Game 1UCAM Esports25:40SU Esports 6 – UCAM Esports 21bluerzor — Lee Sin — 1/0/14, 71% KP
Game 2UCAM Esports31:30SU Esports 10 – UCAM Esports 25ANDARIEL — Ezreal — 7/1/12, 19.00 KDA

FAQ

Q: Why did UCAM Esports win the series 2-0 over SU Esports?

UCAM paired superior fight execution with overwhelming objective pressure, finishing Game 1 with 4 dragons to 0 and Game 2 with 10 towers to 1.

Q: Why was bluerzor’s Lee Sin decisive for UCAM Esports?

bluerzor posted 1/0/14 and 71% KP in Game 1, creating the openings that let UCAM’s top-side advantage snowball into a 21-6 victory.

*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-09-22 16:41 UTC.*