← Blog
Live Draft Analysis

SU Esports vs PCIFIC: Nautilus Risk in TCL Game 4

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

SU Esports face PCIFIC Esports in TCL Game 4 as monkaS risks a low-performing Nautilus into Patch’s Rell and a 67% model edge.

SU EsportsSu Esports
Live Draft Analysis
51%·49%
PICKS
Pcific EsportsPCIFIC Esports
IlllIma
IlllIma
VS GLBNasus
328G50.0%GLOBAL
VS TCLNasus
7G42.9%TCL
1.7 KDA
1G0.0%ILLLIMA
Camille
Camille
topTOP
Nasus
Nasus
Bayonetta
Bayonetta
GLOBAL65.2%23G
CamilleVS GLB
TCL
CamilleVS TCL
RAMES
RAMES
28G35.7%VS GLBOlaf
1057G46.5%GLOBAL
VS TCLOlaf
32G46.9%TCL
3.8 KDA
4G50.0%RAMES
Pantheon
Pantheon
jungleJGL
Olaf
Olaf
stalken
stalken
GLOBAL55.3%309G
PantheonVS GLB64.3%28G
TCL83.3%6G
PantheonVS TCL
Vetheo
Vetheo
41G51.2%VS GLBAnnie
773G53.6%GLOBAL
VS TCLAnnie
33G57.6%TCL
16.0 KDA
1G100.0%VETHEO
Ahri
Ahri
midMID
Annie
Annie
FireAscept
FireAscept
GLOBAL53.5%557G
AhriVS GLB48.8%41G
TCL50.0%6G
AhriVS TCL
Nako
Nako
57G50.9%VS GLBCorki
607G54.7%GLOBAL
VS TCLCorki
14G42.9%TCL
Sivir
Sivir
bottomBOT
Corki
Corki
Scorth
Scorth
GLOBAL47.0%892G
SivirVS GLB49.1%57G
TCL55.6%36G
SivirVS TCL
SCORTH50.0%2G
5.3 KDA
Patch
Patch
152G58.6%VS GLBNautilus
563G46.9%GLOBAL
7G71.4%VS TCLNautilus
27G55.6%TCL
4.3 KDA
1G100.0%PATCH
Rell
Rell
supportSUP
Nautilus
Nautilus
monkaS
monkaS
GLOBAL46.6%1070G
RellVS GLB41.4%152G
TCL40.5%37G
RellVS TCL28.6%7G
MONKAS100.0%2G
4.6 KDA
Su Esports 51%49% Pcific Esports
Polymarketmarket probability · SU Esports · PCIFIC Esports
Game 4
65%·36%
Seriesnow
85%·15%
Full model: 67% / 33%

TL;DR: In TCL Game 4, SU Esports are projected to beat PCIFIC Esports 67% to 33% after PCIFIC lock monkaS onto Nautilus, a pick carrying a 40% TCL WR over 37G and only 2G with the player. PCIFIC need decisive early engage before SU’s coordinated Camille, Ahri, Sivir and Rell scaling takes over.

Nautilus is not an automatic loss, but PCIFIC Esports are asking monkaS to reverse an uncomfortable matchup into Patch’s Rell rather than simply survive lane. The pick signals a deliberate attempt to give Annie and Corki reliable engage access; it works only if stalken’s Olaf creates early chaos and prevents SU Esports from setting up front-to-back fights.

Compositions: SU Esports vs PCIFIC Esports

SU Esports drafted a flexible teamfight and pick composition. IlllIma’s Camille supplies split-push pressure and flank threat, while RAMES on Pantheon can gank through early lanes or join Vetheo’s Ahri for quick catches. Nako’s Sivir accelerates the whole group with On The Hunt, and Patch’s Rell gives the composition dependable engage. In extended games, SU can poke through Ahri and Sivir before forcing a clean engage.

PCIFIC Esports have more volatile tools. Bayonetta’s Nasus wants time to stack and become a side-lane answer to Camille, while stalken’s Olaf must win skirmishes before Pantheon and Rell can lock him down. FireAscept’s Annie plus Scorth’s Corki offer burst and poke, but monkaS’s Nautilus must find the first angle. PCIFIC should contest early objectives aggressively; their scaling is real, but their engage is far less forgiving.

Key Picks and Stats

Top lane is a low-sample counter-pick question. Bayonetta has a 65.2% global WR over 23G on Nasus, while IlllIma’s Camille holds a 50.0% global WR over 328G but only a 42.9% TCL WR over 7G. IlllIma is 0.0% over 1G on Camille in TCL with a 1.7 KDA, so Nasus can punish an unfocused side lane despite no recorded Camille-versus-Nasus sample.

Jungle is PCIFIC’s clearest individual statistical edge: stalken’s Olaf owns a 55.3% global WR over 309G, an 83.3% TCL WR over 6G, and a 64.3% WR over 28G versus Pantheon. RAMES has a 46.5% global WR over 1057G, a 46.9% TCL WR over 32G, and a 50.0% WR over 4G on Pantheon with a 3.8 KDA. Still, Pantheon’s cross-map ganks can make Olaf’s duel advantage irrelevant.

Mid favors Vetheo’s comfort: Ahri has a 53.6% global WR over 773G and 57.6% TCL WR over 33G, while Vetheo is 100.0% over 1G with a 16.0 KDA. FireAscept’s Annie posts a 53.5% global WR over 557G but only 50.0% TCL WR over 6G; Annie’s 48.8% WR over 41G versus Ahri reinforces the concern.

Bot lane has mixed signals. Nako’s Sivir is 54.7% global over 607G but 42.9% TCL over 14G, while Scorth’s Corki is 47.0% global over 892G and 55.6% TCL over 36G. The support matchup swings sharply toward SU: Patch’s Rell is 55.6% TCL over 27G, with a 71.4% WR over 7G versus Nautilus, while monkaS’s Nautilus is 40.5% TCL over 37G and 28.6% over 7G against Rell.

Draft Edge

SU Esports have the cleaner draft because Rell and Ahri can punish every missed Nautilus hook, and the model rates their duo synergy at 0.581 against PCIFIC’s 0.459. Their win condition is controlled vision, Pantheon-Ahri picks, then Sivir-Rell engage around objectives.

PCIFIC need Olaf to snowball the early map, Annie to threaten flash engage, and Nasus to force Camille into an isolated side lane. Nautilus is a risk rather than a standard meta choice: if monkaS survives lane and starts fights on PCIFIC’s terms, Corki can carry the damage checks.

Polymarket Market

Polymarket makes SU Esports 64% for Game 4 and PCIFIC Esports 36%, close to the draft model’s 67% to 33% read. The Series Now market is far more decisive at 85% for SU and 15% for PCIFIC. No Series Pre-Match price is available, so movement from the opening series market cannot be quantified.

The market is more optimistic about PCIFIC in this specific game than in the overall series: 36% in Game 4 versus 15% for the series. That gap reflects PCIFIC’s Olaf and Nasus upside, but the Game 4 price still discounts Nautilus’s 40.5% TCL WR over 37G and his poor Rell matchup after SU won G1 and G2.

Prediction

The model gives SU Esports 67% and PCIFIC Esports 33%; the draft supports a modest increase to 68% for SU. SU won G1 despite trailing 7-11 in kills at 31:10, then won G2 despite trailing 13-25 at 31:50, evidence that PCIFIC’s early leads have not converted into series control. PCIFIC can still overturn the call if stalken maintains his 83.3% TCL WR over 6G Olaf level and breaks the game open before Sivir scaling.

FAQ

Q: Can monkaS’s Nautilus beat Patch’s Rell for PCIFIC Esports?

It is possible through early jungle support, but the numbers favor SU: Patch has a 71.4% WR over 7G versus Nautilus, while monkaS has a 28.6% WR over 7G against Rell.

Q: Is Bayonetta’s Nasus enough to stop IlllIma’s Camille split-push?

Nasus has a 65.2% global WR over 23G, but IlllIma’s Camille brings far more teamfight access through flanks. PCIFIC need Bayonetta to stack safely while Olaf creates enough pressure to deny Camille’s side-lane tempo.

*Data: draftlol live draft model + Polymarket, draft close.*