← Blog
Live Draft Analysis

JD Gaming’s Trundle Surprise vs Xi'an Team WE in LPL

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

JD Gaming’s rare Trundle pick targets Naafiri as Xi'an Team WE face a difficult Sivir lane in this LPL Game 2 draft.

Xi'an Team WEXi'an Team We
Live Draft Analysis
47%·53%
PICKS
Jd GamingJD Gaming
WECube
WECube
104G43.3%VS GLBAmbessa
1134G46.5%GLOBAL
10G20.0%VS LPLAmbessa
132G51.5%LPL
K'Sante
K'Sante
topTOP
Ambessa
Ambessa
JDGXiaoxu
JDGXiaoxu
GLOBAL47.8%1163G
K'SanteVS GLB56.7%104G
LPL50.6%166G
K'SanteVS LPL80.0%10G
JDGXIAOXU0.0%1G
3.3 KDA
WEMonki
WEMonki
24G33.3%VS GLBTrundle
631G52.0%GLOBAL
8G25.0%VS LPLTrundle
116G56.0%LPL
Naafiri
Naafiri
jungleJGL
Trundle
Trundle
JDGJunJia
JDGJunJia
GLOBAL52.5%354G
NaafiriVS GLB66.7%24G
LPL51.9%79G
NaafiriVS LPL75.0%8G
JDGJUNJIA100.0%1G
8.0 KDA
WEKaris
WEKaris
231G50.2%VS GLBAnivia
1412G50.8%GLOBAL
28G60.7%VS LPLAnivia
197G51.8%LPL
Ryze
Ryze
midMID
Anivia
Anivia
JDGHongQ
JDGHongQ
GLOBAL52.5%579G
RyzeVS GLB49.8%231G
LPL35.7%42G
RyzeVS LPL39.3%28G
JDGHONGQ100.0%1G
7.5 KDA
WEAbout
WEAbout
175G38.3%VS GLBSivir
1449G50.0%GLOBAL
31G25.8%VS LPLSivir
153G54.2%LPL
4.0 KDA
1G0.0%WEABOUT
Ezreal
Ezreal
bottomBOT
Sivir
Sivir
JDGGALA
JDGGALA
GLOBAL54.4%621G
EzrealVS GLB61.7%175G
LPL60.4%96G
EzrealVS LPL74.2%31G
JDGGALA100.0%2G
5.5 KDA
WEErha
WEErha
64G42.2%VS GLBKarma
759G50.6%GLOBAL
5G40.0%VS LPLKarma
78G59.0%LPL
Neeko
Neeko
supportSUP
Karma
Karma
JDGVampire
JDGVampire
GLOBAL48.5%787G
NeekoVS GLB57.8%64G
LPL59.3%108G
NeekoVS LPL60.0%5G
JDGVAMPIRE100.0%3G
7.4 KDA
Xi'an Team We 47%53% Jd Gaming
Polymarketmarket probability · Xi'an Team WE · JD Gaming
Game 2
37%·64%
Series *now · same market as the Game
37%·64%
Pre-matchseries · 90 min before
32%·69%
Δ Series: +5.0pp for Xi'an Team WEFull model: 37% / 63%

TL;DR: JD Gaming’s Trundle into Naafiri is the defining surprise of LPL Game 2 against Xi'an Team WE: JDG own a 67% record against Naafiri over 24G, while JDGJunJia has only 1G of LPL Trundle experience. The draft model still favors JD Gaming 63% to 37%.

JD Gaming have trusted the Naafiri counter more than JunJia’s individual history, signaling a deliberate attempt to deny WEMonki early skirmish freedom and set up Trundle pillars around objectives. It is a high-leverage choice: JunJia must turn that favorable matchup into early control before Xi'an Team WE’s Ryze and Neeko can create decisive roam angles.

Compositions: Xi'an Team WE vs JD Gaming

Xi'an Team WE bring engage and pick potential through WEErha’s Neeko, with WEKaris on Ryze providing scaling, side-lane pressure, and Realm Warp access. WEMonki’s Naafiri needs early skirmishes to snowball, while WEAbout’s Ezreal supplies poke but has limited front-to-back damage if JD Gaming establish a protected formation.

JD Gaming’s composition is built for structured teamfights. JDGXiaoxu’s Ambessa can dive, JDGJunJia’s Trundle can isolate targets, and JDGHongQ’s Anivia controls corridors around dragons and barons. JDGGALA’s Sivir and JDGVampire’s Karma give the red side exceptional scaling, waveclear, shields, and movement speed; JDG want to absorb early pressure, then force Xi'an Team WE into narrow objective entrances.

Key Picks and Stats

Top lane is volatile. WECube’s K'Sante has a 46.5% global WR over 1134G and a 51.5% LPL WR over 132G, but only a 20.0% LPL WR versus Ambessa over 10G. JDGXiaoxu’s Ambessa answers with an 80.0% LPL WR versus K'Sante over 10G, although Xiaoxu himself is 0.0% over 1G on Ambessa with a 3.3 KDA.

The jungle matchup is the draft’s clearest counter-pick. WEMonki’s Naafiri owns a 56.0% LPL WR over 116G, yet has only a 25.0% LPL WR versus Trundle over 8G. JunJia’s Trundle has a 51.9% LPL WR over 79G, a 75.0% LPL WR versus Naafiri over 8G, and a 100.0% player record over 1G with an 8.0 KDA.

Mid offers Team WE’s best statistical lane. WEKaris’s Ryze posts a 51.8% LPL WR over 197G and a 60.7% LPL WR versus Anivia over 28G. JDGHongQ’s Anivia is only 35.7% in LPL over 42G, despite his 100.0% record over 1G and 7.5 KDA. Bot is sharply red-sided: WEAbout’s Ezreal has a 25.8% LPL WR versus Sivir over 31G, against JDGGALA’s Sivir at 74.2% over 31G.

Draft Edge

JD Gaming hold the draft edge through Trundle’s Naafiri counter and Sivir-Karma’s scaling lane. Sivir and Karma also carry a 69.11% duo synergy WR over 27.289459886806327G in the model data. Team WE’s route is faster: Neeko engage, Naafiri picks, and Ryze roams must crack mid game before Anivia-Sivir waveclear stabilizes.

Last night’s forecast expected Ryze as Team WE’s B1 and Vi as JD Gaming’s likely B1. Ryze did appear, while Vi did not; exact pick order and bans were not supplied, so the predicted bans cannot be confirmed. Trundle is the meaningful departure from that forecast.

Polymarket Market

Polymarket makes JD Gaming a 64% favorite for Game 2, almost identical to the model’s 63%. The series market is 50% to 50% now, after Xi'an Team WE were only 32% versus JD Gaming’s 68% pre-match: Team WE have gained 18.0 percentage points.

That movement clearly reflects Team WE winning Game 1 despite an 8-34 kill score in a 30:10 game. Yet the Game 2 market is far more optimistic about JD Gaming than the overall series market, likely because Sivir-Karma and the Trundle-Naafiri matchup directly address this specific draft.

Prediction

The model starts at JD Gaming 63% — Xi'an Team WE 37%; the lane data supports a modest adjustment to JD Gaming 64% — Xi'an Team WE 36%. JDG’s 0.600 team-form signal and 0.583 head-to-head signal matter, but Game 1 momentum can still amplify Team WE’s confidence if WEMonki finds early ganks.

FAQ

Q: Can WEMonki’s Naafiri overcome JDGJunJia’s Trundle counter-pick?

A: It can, but the numbers are unfavorable: Naafiri has a 25.0% LPL WR versus Trundle over 8G, while Trundle has a 75.0% LPL WR in that matchup.

Q: Why is JDGGALA’s Sivir so important against WEAbout’s Ezreal?

A: GALA’s Sivir holds a 74.2% LPL WR versus Ezreal over 31G, while About’s Ezreal is at 25.8% over the same 31G sample. Karma’s shields make that lane even harder to punish.

*Data: draftlol live draft model + Polymarket, draft close.*