← Blog
Live Draft Analysis

Bilibili Gaming vs Xi'an Team WE LPL: Nautilus vs Lulu

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

Bilibili Gaming meet Xi'an Team WE in LPL Game 2 as Team WE's Nautilus targets Lulu, testing whether early engage can upset BLG's scaling edge.

Bilibili GamingBilibili Gaming
Live Draft Analysis
51%·49%
PICKS
Xi'an Team WeXi'an Team WE
BLGBin
BLGBin
156G46.2%VS GLBOrnn
1271G53.0%GLOBAL
12G33.3%VS LPLOrnn
163G54.6%LPL
Rumble
Rumble
topTOP
Ornn
Ornn
WECube
WECube
GLOBAL48.0%298G
RumbleVS GLB53.8%156G
LPL60.9%23G
RumbleVS LPL66.7%12G
BLGXun
BLGXun
74G63.5%VS GLBPantheon
426G53.5%GLOBAL
6G33.3%VS LPLPantheon
51G49.0%LPL
Skarner
Skarner
jungleJGL
Pantheon
Pantheon
WEMonki
WEMonki
GLOBAL46.5%1075G
SkarnerVS GLB36.5%74G
LPL47.7%128G
SkarnerVS LPL66.7%6G
BLGKnight
BLGKnight
15G46.7%VS GLBAkali
586G52.0%GLOBAL
VS LPLAkali
41G31.7%LPL
Anivia
Anivia
midMID
Akali
Akali
WEKaris
WEKaris
GLOBAL52.9%546G
AniviaVS GLB53.3%15G
LPL56.7%67G
AniviaVS LPL
BLGViper
BLGViper
229G54.1%VS GLBCorki
1106G50.3%GLOBAL
24G45.8%VS LPLCorki
127G42.5%LPL
Yunara
Yunara
bottomBOT
Corki
Corki
WEAbout
WEAbout
GLOBAL46.8%900G
YunaraVS GLB45.9%229G
LPL52.0%123G
YunaraVS LPL54.2%24G
BLGON
BLGON
64G35.9%VS GLBNautilus
836G46.1%GLOBAL
6G50.0%VS LPLNautilus
116G47.4%LPL
Lulu
Lulu
supportSUP
Nautilus
Nautilus
WEErha
WEErha
GLOBAL46.9%1103G
LuluVS GLB64.1%64G
LPL44.6%112G
LuluVS LPL50.0%6G
Bilibili Gaming 51%49% Xi'an Team We
Polymarketmarket probability · Bilibili Gaming · Xi'an Team WE
Game 2
75%·26%
Series *now · same market as the Game
75%·26%
Pre-matchseries · 90 min before
85%·16%
Δ Series: -10.0pp for Bilibili GamingFull model: 69% / 31%

TL;DR: In LPL Game 2, Bilibili Gaming face Xi'an Team WE with the draft model at 69% to 31%. Team WE's Nautilus, a 45% LPL pick over 112G, attacks Lulu with a 64% matchup WR over 64G, demanding early engage before BLG's scaling carries.

Compositions: Bilibili Gaming vs Xi'an Team WE

Bilibili Gaming have drafted a front-to-back teamfight composition: BLGBin on Rumble supplies zone control, BLGXun's Skarner creates reliable engage, and BLGKnight's Anivia can wall off objectives for BLGViper's Yunara and BLGON's Lulu. Their ideal game is controlled early river access, then a scaling five-man setup around dragons and Baron.

Xi'an Team WE need sharper skirmishes. WECube's Ornn gives them late-game upgrades and a dependable engage button, while WEMonki's Pantheon must gank aggressively to unlock WEKaris's Akali. WEAbout's Corki offers poke, but WEErha's Nautilus is the key: hooks and all-ins must force Lulu defensively before Yunara becomes a protected carry.

Key Picks and Stats

Top lane is more volatile than the model's broad champion signals imply. BLGBin's Rumble owns a 53.0% global WR over 1271G and 54.6% in LPL over 163G, but falls to 46.2% versus Ornn globally over 156G and 33.3% in LPL over 12G. Conversely, WECube's Ornn has a 48.0% global WR over 298G but a striking 60.9% LPL WR over 23G, including 66.7% versus Rumble in 12G.

The jungle matchup favors the broader Skarner data. BLGXun's Skarner holds 53.5% globally over 426G and is 63.5% versus Pantheon over 74G, though its 49.0% LPL WR over 51G and 33.3% LPL matchup WR over 6G leave room for WEMonki's Pantheon to challenge the script. Pantheon has only a 46.5% global WR over 1075G and 47.7% in LPL over 128G.

Mid is WE's clearest individual counter-pick angle. BLGKnight's Anivia posts 52.0% globally over 586G but just 31.7% in LPL over 41G; WEKaris's Akali reaches 52.9% globally over 546G and 56.7% in LPL over 67G. Akali's 53.3% record versus Anivia over 15G means Karis can alter the game if Pantheon enables flank timing.

Bot lane is BLG's scaling bet against a targeted answer. BLGViper's Yunara is at 50.3% globally over 1106G but 42.5% in LPL over 127G, while BLGON's Lulu has a low 46.1% global WR over 836G. Yet WEErha's Nautilus has only 46.9% globally over 1103G and 44.6% in LPL over 112G despite the 64.1% matchup WR versus Lulu over 64G.

Draft Edge

Bilibili Gaming retain the draft edge because Rumble-Skarner-Anivia gives them layered objective control, backed by the model's 0.545 duo synergy against Team WE's 0.479. Rumble and Skarner's 0.6293 synergy WR is especially threatening around choke points.

Last night's forecast expected Ryze as BLG's likely B1 and Rumble as Team WE's possible B1, but neither forecasted opener is visible in this finished composition: Ryze is absent and Rumble instead lands with Bin. The expected Orianna, Rumble, and Nocturne bans cannot be confirmed without a ban list. Nautilus into Lulu is the major departure, a deliberate engage counter rather than a comfort pick.

Polymarket Market

Polymarket makes Bilibili Gaming 74% for Game 2 and Xi'an Team WE 26%, more bullish than the model's 69% to 31%. Its series market is even stronger: BLG are 92% now against 8% for Team WE, up from 84% to 16% pre-match, a move of 8.0 percentage points toward BLG.

The Game market is less optimistic for Bilibili Gaming than the Series market, acknowledging that Team WE's draft has a plausible single-map path. That path is Pantheon pressure into Akali and Nautilus engage onto Lulu; the series price still reflects BLG's 23-5 Game 1 win in 29:30, superior 0.800 form, 0.741 Elo signal, and 0.691 season WR.

Prediction

The model's 69% to 31% prediction for Bilibili Gaming remains justified, but the lane-specific LPL numbers trim the practical edge slightly: BLG are 67% to win. Game 1 momentum favors BLG, although Team WE's 0.700 form means a successful early Pantheon-Nautilus snowball could quickly punish Anivia and Lulu's immobility.

FAQ

Q: Can WEErha's Nautilus punish BLGON's Lulu enough for Xi'an Team WE to win?

A: Yes, but Team WE need early execution: Nautilus carries a 64.1% WR versus Lulu over 64G, despite only a 44.6% LPL WR over 112G.

Q: Why is BLGKnight's Anivia risky against WEKaris's Akali?

A: Anivia is only 31.7% in LPL over 41G, while Akali is 56.7% in LPL over 67G and has a 53.3% record versus Anivia over 15G.

*Data: draftlol live draft model + Polymarket, draft close.*