← Blog
Live Draft Analysis

Ground Zero Gaming vs DFM: Mel Risk Shapes LCP Draft

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

Ground Zero Gaming face DetonatioN FocusMe in LCP Game 2 as Betty’s risky Mel into Jhin tests a 73% model edge and strong series momentum.

Ground Zero GamingGround Zero Gaming
Live Draft Analysis
49%·51%
PICKS
Detonation FocusmeDetonatioN FocusMe
1Jiang
1Jiang
201G51.7%VS GLBRumble
1044G47.6%GLOBAL
13G38.5%VS LCPRumble
50G42.0%LCP
2.4 KDA
8G25.0%1JIANG
Ambessa
Ambessa
topTOP
Rumble
Rumble
Momo
Momo
GLOBAL52.0%1126G
AmbessaVS GLB48.3%201G
LCP62.7%67G
AmbessaVS LCP61.5%13G
MOMO33.3%6G
3.0 KDA
Husha
Husha
48G41.7%VS GLBVi
591G54.5%GLOBAL
2G0.0%VS LCPVi
43G60.5%LCP
6.0 KDA
2G50.0%HUSHA
Lee Sin
Lee Sin
jungleJGL
Vi
Vi
Citrus
Citrus
GLOBAL53.5%1012G
Lee SinVS GLB58.3%48G
LCP58.7%46G
Lee SinVS LCP100.0%2G
Uniboy
Uniboy
50G48.0%VS GLBYone
1273G51.4%GLOBAL
4G50.0%VS LCPYone
67G64.2%LCP
Ryze
Ryze
midMID
Yone
Yone
Fisher
Fisher
GLOBAL51.7%236G
RyzeVS GLB52.0%50G
LCP53.8%13G
RyzeVS LCP50.0%4G
FISHER0.0%1G
1.3 KDA
Betty
Betty
17G29.4%VS GLBJhin
276G42.0%GLOBAL
4G25.0%VS LCPJhin
20G40.0%LCP
3.8 KDA
1G0.0%BETTY
Mel
Mel
bottomBOT
Jhin
Jhin
Kakkun
Kakkun
GLOBAL45.2%743G
MelVS GLB70.6%17G
LCP52.8%36G
MelVS LCP75.0%4G
KAKKUN0.0%2G
3.0 KDA
Kaiwing
Kaiwing
58G34.5%VS GLBAlistar
417G50.1%GLOBAL
6G50.0%VS LCPAlistar
21G47.6%LCP
Leona
Leona
supportSUP
Alistar
Alistar
Woody
Woody
GLOBAL55.2%625G
LeonaVS GLB65.5%58G
LCP59.5%37G
LeonaVS LCP50.0%6G
WOODY0.0%1G
0.3 KDA
Ground Zero Gaming 49%51% Detonation Focusme
Polymarketmarket probability · Ground Zero Gaming · DetonatioN FocusMe
Game 2
71%·30%
Seriesnow
90%·10%
Pre-matchseries · 90 min before
81%·20%
Δ Series: +9.5pp for Ground Zero GamingFull model: 73% / 27%

TL;DR: Ground Zero Gaming face DetonatioN FocusMe in LCP Game 2 with the draft model at 73% to 27%, but Betty’s Mel is the focal gamble: Mel has a 42.0% global WR in 276G, a 29.4% WR versus Jhin in 17G, and only 1G for Betty in LCP. Ground Zero Gaming are betting that coordinated engage can protect the lane long enough for Mel to scale.

Compositions: Ground Zero Gaming vs DetonatioN FocusMe

Ground Zero Gaming field 1Jiang on Ambessa, Husha on Lee Sin, Uniboy on Ryze, Betty on Mel, and Kaiwing on Leona. This is a skirmish-and-engage composition: Leona and Lee Sin must create access, Ryze can roam first, and Ambessa can follow into the back line while Mel supplies scaling damage.

DetonatioN FocusMe answer with Momo’s Rumble, Citrus’s Vi, Fisher’s Yone, Kakkun’s Jhin, and Woody’s Alistar. Their cleanest route is decisive engage around Vi, Alistar, and Rumble’s Equalizer, converting Jhin poke into objective control before Ryze and Mel take over longer fights. Yone also gives them a side-lane split-push threat.

Key Picks and Stats

The bot lane defines the volatility. Betty’s Mel carries a 42.0% global WR in 276G and 40.0% LCP WR in 20G, yet Betty is 0.0% in 1G on the champion; against Jhin, Mel is only 29.4% in 17G globally and 25.0% in 4G in LCP. Kakkun’s Jhin has a 45.2% global WR in 743G, 52.8% in 36G in LCP, and a 70.6% WR versus Mel in 17G, despite Kakkun’s 0.0% in 2G Jhin record.

Top lane favors the red-side matchup data: Ambessa has a 47.6% global WR in 1044G, 42.0% in 50G in LCP, and 1Jiang is 25.0% in 8G with a 2.4 KDA. Momo’s Rumble owns a 52.0% global WR in 1126G, 62.7% in 67G in LCP, and Rumble is 61.5% versus Ambessa in 13G in LCP, although Momo is 33.3% in 6G on Rumble.

Husha’s Lee Sin brings a 54.5% global WR in 591G and 60.5% in 43G in LCP, but Lee Sin is 0.0% versus Vi in 2G in LCP. Citrus’s Vi is 53.5% globally in 1012G, 58.7% in 46G in LCP, and 100.0% versus Lee Sin in 2G. Mid is steadier: Uniboy’s Ryze has a 51.4% global WR in 1273G and 64.2% in 67G in LCP, while Fisher is 0.0% in 1G on Yone.

Draft Edge

DetonatioN FocusMe have the sharper lane counters through Rumble into Ambessa and Jhin into Mel, plus Vi-Rumble engage. Still, Ground Zero Gaming retain the broader teamfight ceiling: Ryze’s reliable LCP profile and Leona’s engage can let them snowball through coordinated river fights.

Last night’s forecast expected an Ashe B1 for Ground Zero Gaming and Ryze priority for DetonatioN FocusMe. Ashe did not appear in the displayed draft, while Ryze instead landed with Uniboy; without the ban and pick order, the projected bans and B1 cannot be confirmed. Mel is the clear departure from that forecast.

Polymarket Market

Polymarket prices Game 2 at 70% to 30% for Ground Zero Gaming, while the Series Now market is 90% to 10%. Before the match, the series was 80% to 20%, and Ground Zero Gaming gained 9.5 percentage points.

The market is less optimistic about Ground Zero Gaming in this specific game than in the series, reflecting the Mel-Jhin risk and DetonatioN FocusMe’s favorable top-jungle matchup. Yet Game 1’s 28-18 kills in 39:30 and Ground Zero Gaming’s stronger form, head-to-head, and Elo signals explain the heavy series price.

Prediction

The model remains 73% to 27% for Ground Zero Gaming. I trim that to 71% to 29% because DetonatioN FocusMe’s Rumble-Vi-Jhin lanes can punish Mel early, but their 0.200 team-form signal against Ground Zero Gaming’s 0.500 and the Game 1 loss leave little room for another slow start.

FAQ

Q: Can Betty’s Mel survive Kakkun’s Jhin for Ground Zero Gaming?

It is the central risk: Mel holds only a 29.4% WR versus Jhin in 17G, so Kaiwing’s Leona must deny Jhin free poke and set up engage windows.

Q: Why is DetonatioN FocusMe still an underdog with Momo’s Rumble and Citrus’s Vi?

Their lane data are strong, including Rumble’s 61.5% WR versus Ambessa in 13G in LCP, but DetonatioN FocusMe entered with a 0.200 form signal and already lost Game 1.

*Data: draftlol live draft model + Polymarket, draft close.*

Ground Zero Gaming vs DFM: Mel Risk Shapes LCP Draft | draftlol.ai