← Blog
Live Draft Analysis

CTBC Flying Oyster vs MVK: Renata Draft Risk in LCP

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

CTBC Flying Oyster face MVK Esports in LCP Game 2 as Kino’s rare Alistar tests Renata Glasc’s poor regional record and MVK’s series momentum.

CTBC Flying OysterCtbc Flying Oyster
Live Draft Analysis
50%·50%
PICKS
Mvk EsportsMVK Esports
Rest
Rest
200G48.5%VS GLBAmbessa
1118G52.0%GLOBAL
12G66.7%VS LCPAmbessa
67G64.2%LCP
5.3 KDA
13G69.2%REST
Rumble
Rumble
topTOP
Ambessa
Ambessa
Kratos
Kratos
GLOBAL47.5%1038G
RumbleVS GLB51.5%200G
LCP40.8%49G
RumbleVS LCP33.3%12G
KRATOS60.0%5G
3.0 KDA
Shad0w
Shad0w
163G41.7%VS GLBVi
1256G51.7%GLOBAL
5G40.0%VS LCPVi
61G54.1%LCP
2.6 KDA
8G25.0%SHAD0W
Jarvan IV
Jarvan IV
jungleJGL
Vi
Vi
Gury
Gury
GLOBAL53.1%1002G
Jarvan IVVS GLB58.3%163G
LCP56.5%46G
Jarvan IVVS LCP60.0%5G
GURY60.0%5G
6.8 KDA
POUT
POUT
48G54.2%VS GLBRyze
233G52.4%GLOBAL
3G66.7%VS LCPRyze
12G58.3%LCP
Yone
Yone
midMID
Ryze
Ryze
Chika
Chika
GLOBAL51.5%1268G
YoneVS GLB45.8%48G
LCP64.2%67G
YoneVS LCP33.3%3G
CHIKA100.0%2G
6.0 KDA
Doggo
Doggo
9G55.6%VS GLBKalista
299G47.5%GLOBAL
VS LCPKalista
12G33.3%LCP
Ziggs
Ziggs
bottomBOT
Kalista
Kalista
Harky
Harky
GLOBAL48.8%129G
ZiggsVS GLB44.4%9G
LCP33.3%3G
ZiggsVS LCP
HARKY100.0%1G
3.8 KDA
Kino
Kino
11G63.6%VS GLBRenata Glasc
620G55.6%GLOBAL
VS LCPRenata Glasc
37G62.2%LCP
6.3 KDA
2G100.0%KINO
Alistar
Alistar
supportSUP
Renata Glasc
Renata Glasc
SiuLoong
SiuLoong
GLOBAL45.5%123G
AlistarVS GLB36.4%11G
LCP0.0%5G
AlistarVS LCP
Ctbc Flying Oyster 50%50% Mvk Esports
Polymarketmarket probability · CTBC Flying Oyster · MVK Esports
Game 2
45%·55%
Seriesnow
33%·68%
Pre-matchseries · 90 min before
49%·52%
Δ Series: -16.0pp for CTBC Flying OysterFull model: 41% / 59%

TL;DR: In LCP Game 2, CTBC Flying Oyster face MVK Esports with the draft model favoring MVK Esports 59% to 41%. CTBC’s answer to Renata Glasc is Kino’s Alistar, a pairing he has played in only 2G in LCP but won at 100.0%, demanding decisive engage before MVK’s scaling takes over.

Compositions: CTBC Flying Oyster vs MVK Esports

CTBC Flying Oyster drafted a volatile engage-and-poke composition: Rest’s Rumble supplies teamfight zone control, Shad0w’s Jarvan IV creates the engage window, POUT’s Yone follows into back lines, and Doggo’s Ziggs turns objective setups into poke sieges. Kino’s Alistar must find clean roams and flank engages; CTBC cannot afford a passive early game against Kalista and Vi.

MVK Esports have more direct skirmish tools. Kratos’s Ambessa and Gury’s Vi can force access onto Ziggs, while Chika’s Ryze provides scaling, side-lane pressure, and Realm Warp angles. Harky’s Kalista and SiuLoong’s Renata Glasc want early lane control, then a mid-game pick that lets MVK snowball objectives before CTBC’s area control can stabilize fights.

Key Picks and Stats

Top lane favors CTBC statistically. Rest’s Rumble has a 52.0% global WR over 1118G, a 64.2% LCP WR over 67G, and Rest owns a 69.2% LCP WR over 13G with a 5.2 KDA. Against Ambessa, Rumble holds a 66.7% LCP WR over 12G. Kratos’s Ambessa has only a 40.8% LCP WR over 49G, although his personal 60.0% over 5G is a warning against overreading champion data.

The jungle matchup is MVK’s clearest lane advantage. Gury’s Vi has a 53.1% global WR over 1002G, a 56.5% LCP WR over 46G, and a 60.0% personal LCP WR over 5G with a 6.8 KDA. Shad0w’s Jarvan IV is 25.0% over 8G with a 2.6 KDA, while Jarvan IV has only a 40.0% LCP WR over 5G into Vi.

POUT’s Yone is a counter-pick signal: Yone owns a 58.3% LCP WR over 12G and a 66.7% LCP WR over 3G against Ryze. Yet Chika’s Ryze carries a 64.2% LCP WR over 67G and Chika is 100.0% over 2G with a 6.0 KDA. Bot is sharply unstable: Doggo’s Ziggs is 33.3% over 12G in LCP, while Harky’s Kalista is 100.0% over 1G.

Draft Edge

Last night’s forecast correctly treated Rumble and Ryze as premium CTBC routes, but MVK did not remove either with the expected bans. That gives CTBC real solo-lane upside, while Pantheon’s absence cannot be assessed without the ban order. The forecast’s expected MVK bans on Rumble, Ryze, and Pantheon were therefore not fully realized by the visible draft.

Kino’s Alistar into SiuLoong’s Renata Glasc is the unusual choice. Renata has a 0.0% LCP WR over 5G for SiuLoong, while Kino is 100.0% over 2G on Alistar; CTBC need that engage to deny Renata resets. MVK still own the cleaner draft edge through Vi-Kalista pressure and a 61.34% synergy WR for Vi plus Kalista over 7.20355276025268G.

Polymarket Market

Polymarket prices Game 2 at CTBC Flying Oyster 45% and MVK Esports 55%, slightly less bearish on CTBC than the model. The Series Now market is CTBC 32% and MVK 68%, versus 48% and 52% pre-match: CTBC have fallen 16.0 percentage points after MVK’s Game 1 win, 6-19 in kills over 34:10.

The game market is more optimistic for CTBC than the series market, reflecting Rumble, Yone, and Alistar’s draft-specific upset paths. Still, MVK’s series price accounts for current form at 0.643, superior Elo at 0.575, and the confidence created by their Game 1 control.

Prediction

The model remains CTBC Flying Oyster 41% and MVK Esports 59%. I would move only slightly toward CTBC, to 43% and 57%, because Rest’s Rumble and POUT’s Yone have meaningful LCP matchup data. MVK’s stronger form, Gury’s Vi advantage, and the mental momentum from Game 1 keep them favored.

FAQ

Q: Can Kino’s Alistar neutralize SiuLoong’s Renata Glasc for CTBC Flying Oyster?

A: Kino is 100.0% over 2G on Alistar in LCP with a 6.2 KDA, while SiuLoong’s Renata Glasc is 0.0% over 5G in LCP. The sample is small, but CTBC have a credible engage answer.

Q: Why is Gury’s Vi so important against Shad0w’s Jarvan IV?

A: Gury’s Vi is 60.0% over 5G against Jarvan IV in LCP, while Shad0w’s Jarvan IV is 25.0% over 8G in LCP. Vi can punish Jarvan’s first engage and open Kalista’s snowball route.

*Data: draftlol live draft model + Polymarket, draft close.*

CTBC Flying Oyster vs MVK: Renata Draft Risk in LCP | draftlol.ai