← Blog

kt Rolster vs Team Vitality: Cho’Gath’s Risky DCGI Draft

By Draftlol Analysis Desk5 min read

kt Rolster and Team Vitality bring contrasting DCGI drafts: Cho’Gath’s risky lane into Yorick meets KT’s narrow model edge and a shifting series market.

LIVE DRAFT ANALYSISDemacia Cup Global InvitationalGame 4Patch 26.18
kt Rolster
kt Rolster
53%·47%Model · picks
Team Vitality
Team Vitality
20.0%VS GLB
46.5%GLOBAL
—VS Demacia Cup Global Invitational
—Demacia Cup Global Invitational
Yorick
Yorick
topTOP
Cho'Gath
Cho'Gath
GLOBAL36.8%
VS GLB80.0%
Demacia Cup Global Invitational—
VS Demacia Cup Global Invitational—
47.4%VS GLB
53.6%GLOBAL
—VS Demacia Cup Global Invitational
—Demacia Cup Global Invitational
Skarner
Skarner
jungleJGL
Trundle
Trundle
GLOBAL52.7%
VS GLB52.6%
Demacia Cup Global Invitational—
VS Demacia Cup Global Invitational—
100.0%VS GLB
50.9%GLOBAL
—VS Demacia Cup Global Invitational
—Demacia Cup Global Invitational
Locke
Locke
midMID
Hwei
Hwei
GLOBAL43.1%
VS GLB0.0%
Demacia Cup Global Invitational—
VS Demacia Cup Global Invitational—
42.1%VS GLB
50.8%GLOBAL
—VS Demacia Cup Global Invitational
—Demacia Cup Global Invitational
Yunara
Yunara
bottomBOT
Caitlyn
Caitlyn
GLOBAL52.1%
VS GLB57.9%
Demacia Cup Global Invitational—
VS Demacia Cup Global Invitational—
50.7%VS GLB
48.3%GLOBAL
—VS Demacia Cup Global Invitational
—Demacia Cup Global Invitational
Lulu
Lulu
supportSUP
Karma
Karma
GLOBAL47.7%
VS GLB49.3%
Demacia Cup Global Invitational—
VS Demacia Cup Global Invitational—
Model
53%47%
Polymarketmarket probability · kt Rolster · Team Vitality
Game 4
75%·26%
Seriesnow
57%·44%
Pre-matchseries · 90 min before
88%·13%
Δ Series: -31.0pp for kt RolsterFull model: 52% / 48%

TL;DR: In DCGI Game 4, kt Rolster’s draft model edge is slight at 52% to Team Vitality’s 48%, but Team Vitality’s Cho’Gath pick into Yorick is the standout gamble: Cho’Gath has a 37% global WR over 57G, yet an 80% WR over 5G against Yorick. Vitality needs that tiny head-to-head sample to translate into lane control.

Cho’Gath is Team Vitality’s calculated risk: NaakNako is trusting an 80% WR over 5G into Yorick, despite the champion’s 37% global WR over 57G. If Cho’Gath can blunt Yorick’s side-lane pressure and stay relevant in fights, the counter-pick can work; otherwise, KT’s top-lane scaling threat may become difficult to contain.

Compositions: kt Rolster vs Team Vitality

KT pairs Skarner’s engage with Lulu’s protection and Yunara’s scaling damage, while Yorick adds split-push pressure. Bdd’s Locke provides a mid-lane matchup into Hwei, though the supplied data does not establish Locke’s exact role or kit. KT wants Skarner to create openings in the early and mid game, then let Yunara and Yorick threaten separate lanes or close fights in the late game.

Vitality’s Caitlyn and Karma suggest an early poke-and-lane-pressure approach, backed by Hwei’s ranged damage. Trundle can contest Skarner’s frontline and support skirmishes, while Cho’Gath adds durability and potential engage. Vitality must turn its bot-lane pressure into objectives before KT’s scaling and side-lane options take over.

Key Picks and Stats

In top lane, KTPerfecT’s Yorick has a 46.5% global WR over 419G this season and a 20.0% WR over 5G against Cho’Gath. VITNaakNako’s Cho’Gath has a 36.8% global WR over 57G; his 80.0% WR over 5G against Yorick is the counter-pick’s clearest supporting stat, but the sample is small. The model’s broader champion data similarly favors neither matchup decisively.

In jungle, KTCuzz’s Skarner posts a 53.6% global WR over 545G, while VITLyncas’s Trundle has a 52.7% global WR over 446G. Skarner’s matchup WR is 47.4% over 19G against Trundle; Trundle’s is 52.6% over 19G against Skarner.

Mid is uncertain: KTBdd’s Locke has a 50.9% global WR over 269G, while VITFIESTA’s Hwei has a 43.1% global WR over 188G. Their supplied head-to-head records are 100.0% over 2G for Locke and 0.0% over 2G for Hwei, far too few games for certainty.

Bot lane favors Caitlyn’s experience: VITCarzzy’s Caitlyn is at 52.1% over 875G, against KTJiwoo’s Yunara at 50.8% over 1375G. Caitlyn’s head-to-head is 57.9% over 107G, while Yunara’s is 42.1% over 107G. Support is closer: KTEffort’s Lulu has a 48.3% WR over 1107G, and VITFleshy’s Karma has 47.7% over 964G; Karma leads their matchup 49.3% to 50.7%? The supplied figures instead give Lulu 50.7% over 71G and Karma 49.3% over 71G.

The pre-draft analysis named Cassiopeia or Kalista as likely B1 picks, each at 75% WR in the event’s P1 sample. Neither appears in the draft, and the provided information does not list bans, so the predicted bans cannot be confirmed. Cho’Gath is the sharpest departure from last night’s forecast: the analysis had emphasized Vitality’s stronger peak results and KT’s broader pool, not this specific top-lane gamble.

Draft Edge

The model gives KT the narrow edge, 52%–48%, supported by stronger listed champion and matchup aggregates, plus better duo synergy (0.533 to 0.439). The draft’s most credible KT route is Skarner engage into protected Yunara damage, with Yorick pulling attention aside. Vitality’s route is to exploit Caitlyn–Karma’s lane pressure, use Trundle to disrupt Skarner, and make Cho’Gath’s favorable but tiny matchup sample matter before KT scales.

Polymarket Market

The real-money Game 4 market favors KT 74%–26%; the Series market now stands at 56%–44% for KT. Before the match, the Series price was 88%–12%, so KT has fallen 31.0 percentage points while Vitality has gained ground. The Game market is 18 percentage points more optimistic about KT than the current Series market, suggesting traders see KT as more likely to win this map than the series overall. That gap is consistent with KT’s slight model draft edge, while Vitality’s strong team form and the steep series repricing indicate reasons for caution.

Prediction

The draft model’s kt Rolster 52%–Team Vitality 48% call remains reasonable, though the market is substantially more bullish on KT in this game. KT’s stronger duo-synergy signal and scaling tools support the edge; Vitality’s 0.600 team-form signal, against KT’s 0.500, and the Cho’Gath counter-pick keep an upset in play.

FAQ

Q: Can VITNaakNako’s Cho’Gath hold Yorick in lane?

His 80.0% WR over 5G against Yorick is encouraging, but Cho’Gath’s 36.8% global WR over 57G makes this a risky counter-pick.

Q: Which bot lane has the clearer statistical advantage?

Caitlyn leads the head-to-head with a 57.9% WR over 107G against Yunara, but KT’s Skarner–Yunara synergy offers a route to protect Jiwoo’s scaling.

*Data: draftlol live draft model + Polymarket, draft close.*

Next chapter · Game 4KT Rolster’s Draft Edge Delivers in DCGI Game 4 →