← Blog
Live Draft Analysis

Vivo Keyd Stars vs paiN: Azir Risk Defines CBLOL G2

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

Vivo Keyd Stars hold a draft edge over paiN Gaming in CBLOL Game 2, but Namiru’s risky Azir must survive Galio to unlock paiN’s scaling.

Vivo Keyd StarsVivo Keyd Stars
Live Draft Analysis
52%·48%
PICKS
Pain GamingpaiN Gaming
zekas
zekas
44G45.5%VS GLBAmbessa
440G48.2%GLOBAL
VS CBLOLAmbessa
43G46.5%CBLOL
Aatrox
Aatrox
topTOP
Ambessa
Ambessa
Boal
Boal
GLOBAL47.7%1168G
AatroxVS GLB54.5%44G
CBLOL62.3%53G
AatroxVS CBLOL
BOAL66.7%3G
4.7 KDA
Disamis
Disamis
14G42.9%VS GLBVi
340G55.0%GLOBAL
2G50.0%VS CBLOLVi
13G46.2%CBLOL
Olaf
Olaf
jungleJGL
Vi
Vi
CarioK
CarioK
GLOBAL53.4%1129G
OlafVS GLB57.1%14G
CBLOL54.5%44G
OlafVS CBLOL50.0%2G
CARIOK40.0%5G
1.8 KDA
Mireu
Mireu
7G71.4%VS GLBAzir
526G47.1%GLOBAL
VS CBLOLAzir
32G59.4%CBLOL
3.2 KDA
4G75.0%MIREU
Galio
Galio
midMID
Azir
Azir
Namiru
Namiru
GLOBAL44.6%704G
GalioVS GLB28.6%7G
CBLOL30.8%13G
GalioVS CBLOL
Jeskla
Jeskla
169G59.2%VS GLBEzreal
623G54.4%GLOBAL
9G77.8%VS CBLOLEzreal
32G50.0%CBLOL
Sivir
Sivir
bottomBOT
Ezreal
Ezreal
Hena
Hena
GLOBAL49.9%1464G
SivirVS GLB40.8%169G
CBLOL47.9%71G
SivirVS CBLOL22.2%9G
HENA33.3%3G
2.1 KDA
scamber
scamber
169G47.3%VS GLBBard
794G47.4%GLOBAL
3G33.3%VS CBLOLBard
27G44.4%CBLOL
6.0 KDA
2G50.0%SCAMBER
Karma
Karma
supportSUP
Bard
Bard
Ceos
Ceos
GLOBAL53.6%1098G
KarmaVS GLB52.7%169G
CBLOL63.0%54G
KarmaVS CBLOL66.7%3G
CEOS50.0%2G
3.7 KDA
Vivo Keyd Stars 52%48% Pain Gaming
Polymarketmarket probability · Vivo Keyd Stars · paiN Gaming
Game 2
70%·31%
Seriesnow
84%·17%
Pre-matchseries · 90 min before
64%·37%
Δ Series: +20.0pp for Vivo Keyd StarsFull model: 70% / 30%

TL;DR: In CBLOL Game 2, Vivo Keyd Stars are projected at 70% against paiN Gaming’s 30%, and the draft turns on Namiru’s Azir: a 30.8% CBLOL WR over 13G and 28.6% versus Galio over 7G that must reach scaling safely.

Compositions: Vivo Keyd Stars vs paiN Gaming

paiN Gaming have committed Namiru to Azir despite the weak local and head-to-head record, aiming for a late-game control point behind Boal’s Ambessa and CarioK’s Vi engage. That plan needs Namiru to avoid Galio roams, while Hena’s Ezreal and Ceos’s Bard create enough poke and map pressure to delay decisive fights.

Vivo Keyd Stars bring the cleaner five-on-five setup. zekas on Aatrox and Disamis on Olaf want early skirmishes, while Mireu’s Galio can engage from range and protect Jeskla’s Sivir-Karma scaling core. scamber’s Karma shields turn Sivir’s movement speed into a reliable teamfight engage or disengage tool; paiN need Bard picks and Vi ultimates before that front-to-back formation snowballs.

Key Picks and Stats

Top lane is paiN’s strongest individual lane signal. Boal’s Ambessa owns a 47.7% global WR over 1168G, a 62.3% CBLOL WR over 53G, and a 66.7% personal CBLOL WR over 3G with a 4.7 KDA. Ambessa has a 54.5% global WR versus Aatrox over 44G, while zekas’s Aatrox has a 45.5% matchup WR across the same 44G.

Jungle is more volatile. Disamis’s Olaf posts a 55.0% global WR over 340G, but only 46.2% in CBLOL over 13G; his 42.9% global WR versus Vi over 14G is a concern. CarioK’s Vi has a 53.4% global WR over 1129G and 54.5% in CBLOL over 44G, yet his personal Vi mark is just 40.0% over 5G with a 1.8 KDA.

Mid heavily favors Vivo Keyd Stars’ response. Mireu’s Galio has a 59.4% CBLOL WR over 32G, a 75.0% personal WR over 4G, and a 3.2 KDA; Galio is 71.4% globally versus Azir over 7G. Namiru’s Azir carries a 44.6% global WR over 704G, but only 30.8% in CBLOL over 13G.

Bot lane compounds that edge: Jeskla’s Sivir is 54.4% globally over 623G and 77.8% versus Ezreal in CBLOL over 9G. Hena’s Ezreal is only 22.2% versus Sivir in CBLOL over 9G, plus a 33.3% personal Ezreal WR over 3G with a 2.1 KDA.

Draft Edge

Last night’s forecast prioritized Vi, Ambessa, and Viktor for Vivo Keyd Stars, but the completed draft does not show Vivo Keyd Stars securing any of those picks; paiN Gaming instead field Ambessa and Vi. The actual ban list and pick order are unavailable, so the expected bans and B1 calls cannot be verified.

Vivo Keyd Stars still own the draft edge through Galio-Sivir-Karma cohesion and the Sivir-Ezreal lane record. paiN’s win condition is Boal winning side pressure, CarioK finding clean engage windows, and Namiru scaling without being punished by Galio roams.

Polymarket Market

Polymarket prices Game 2 at Vivo Keyd Stars 70% and paiN Gaming 30%, while the current series market is 82% to 18%. The series price rose from 64% to 82% for Vivo Keyd Stars before this point; the market feed reports a +19.0 percentage points move.

The market is less optimistic about Vivo Keyd Stars in this individual game than in the overall series: 70% for Game 2 versus 82% for the series. That discount reflects paiN’s real engage tools through Ambessa, Vi, and Bard, but Azir’s 30.8% CBLOL WR and the Sivir matchup make the draft hard to endorse.

Prediction

The draft model remains Vivo Keyd Stars 70% to paiN Gaming 30%. I would shade it to 72% for Vivo Keyd Stars and 28% for paiN Gaming because Galio into Azir and Sivir into Ezreal offer unusually direct statistical leverage; Boal’s Ambessa form and a CarioK Vi recovery game remain the key upset paths.

G1 went to Vivo Keyd Stars at 0-0 kills in 0:10, so it provides series momentum but no meaningful in-game performance sample. paiN’s 0.300 team-form signal and Vivo Keyd Stars’ 0.647 head-to-head signal further support blue side.

FAQ

Q: Can Namiru’s Azir carry paiN Gaming against Mireu’s Galio?

A: It is possible only if paiN prevent Galio roams and buy Azir time to scale. Namiru has a 30.8% CBLOL WR over 13G, while Mireu has a 75.0% personal Galio WR over 4G.

Q: Why is Jeskla’s Sivir such a major threat to Hena’s Ezreal?

A: Jeskla’s Sivir has a 77.8% CBLOL WR versus Ezreal over 9G, while Hena’s Ezreal is 22.2% in that matchup over 9G. Karma shielding also makes it harder for Bard and Vi to isolate Sivir.

*Data: draftlol live draft model + Polymarket, draft close.*