FlyQuest’s Renata-Led Rout Sets the Tone at DCGI
Cryogen’s Renata Glasc powered FlyQuest’s 22-5 win over Shopify Rebellion, while two Baron takes turned a commanding lead into a decisive DCGI opener.


Cryogen’s Renata Glasc anchored FlyQuest’s decisive 22-5 opener.
MVP
Cryogen finished 2/2/16 with 82% KP, anchoring FlyQuest's 22-5 win.
Verified predictions
- Pre-draft analysis flagged Vi and Kalista. They all appeared in the draft — assess whether they delivered as predicted. Pre-match
- Polymarket gives FlyQuest a 65.5% implied win probability Pre-match
- FlyQuest’s average gold difference at 15 is stronger in every lane shown. Pre-match
TL;DR: Cryogen’s Renata Glasc anchored FlyQuest’s dominant 22-5 win over Shopify Rebellion, finishing 2/2/16 with 82% KP. Gryffinn’s Vi went 4/0/11, and FlyQuest claimed 2 barons to 0 to turn its advantage into a commanding 67.4k–54.2k finish in 35:00. The opener gives FlyQuest the early edge in this DCGI series.
Key Takeaways
- Cryogen posted 82% KP on Renata Glasc, linking FlyQuest’s fights and giving its carries room to finish them.
- Gryffinn finished on 15.00 KDA with Vi, helping FlyQuest convert its advantage into a 22-5 kill lead.
- FlyQuest secured 2 barons to 0 and finished with a 13.2k gold lead, making Shopify Rebellion’s resistance increasingly difficult.
Building the Lead
The most striking thread of this DCGI opener was the way Cryogen’s Renata Glasc made FlyQuest’s aggression feel coordinated rather than reckless. Her 2/2/16 line and 82% KP placed her at the center of the team’s successful plays: not simply surviving the engage, but helping turn it into a fight FlyQuest could win.
Gryffinn’s Vi supplied the reliable point of entry. The jungler ended 4/0/11, a spotless record that reflected how effectively FlyQuest found targets without giving Shopify Rebellion a way back through counterattacks. In the top lane, Gakgos went 5/0/8 on Ambessa, adding another threat that Shopify had to account for whenever the teams met.
That pressure helped FlyQuest pull away on the map. The team took 9 towers to 4, collected 3 dragons to 1, and claimed 2 barons to 0. Those objectives tell the story of more than a kill advantage: FlyQuest repeatedly converted its control into structures and neutral-objective rewards.
The Numbers Tell the Story
Massu supplied the sharpest finishing edge, ending 9/3/8 on Kalista. Shopify Rebellion’s Bvoy had a +541 GoldDiff@15 against Massu’s -541, so the eventual outcome was not simply a case of the bot laner starting ahead. FlyQuest’s broader execution overcame that early comparison, and Massu became its leading scorer as the match developed.
The final team totals make the scale of that turnaround plain: FlyQuest reached 67.4k gold, while Shopify Rebellion finished on 54.2k. A 13.2k difference, combined with 22-5 kills and the objective gap, left Shopify with too little map access to build a credible comeback. The game lasted 35:00; the supplied match information does not identify the patch.
The pre-draft analysis specifically flagged Vi and Kalista, and both appeared in the draft. The prediction paid off in the result: Gryffinn’s undefeated 4/0/11 Vi gave FlyQuest dependable engage, while Massu’s 9/3/8 Kalista provided the clearest source of damage and cleanup. That does not prove either champion alone decided the game, but both delivered meaningful value in the roles their compositions needed.
The Final Push
FlyQuest’s 2 barons to 0 turned its control into a closing advantage Shopify Rebellion could not match. With the side lanes and towers under pressure, the Baron-backed push forced Shopify to defend rather than choose favorable fights. The disparity in the final totals—9-4 in towers, 3-1 in dragons and 22-5 in kills—shows how thoroughly FlyQuest dictated the finish.
This was a one-sided opening rather than a narrow escape. FlyQuest took Game 1 of the best-of-three, but the first result only establishes the series position; Shopify Rebellion will have to adjust in the next game. The standout lesson for both teams is that FlyQuest’s coordinated engage and follow-up made its lead grow into control of the map.
Polymarket Market
The market leaned toward FlyQuest before the series: the pre-match series price put it at 66%, close to the stated 65.5% implied win probability. At draft close for Game 1, FlyQuest stood at 68% to Shopify Rebellion’s 32%, so the market read the winner correctly and the favorite delivered. What the result made especially clear was the scale of the execution: FlyQuest won 22-5, took 2 barons to 0, and finished 13.2k gold ahead. Those figures describe a rout, not merely a predicted win. The series remains alive at 1-0 for FlyQuest; after the game, the series market moved to 88% FlyQuest and 12% Shopify Rebellion, a 17.0-point shift toward FlyQuest from draft close. The next game now carries greater pressure for Shopify.
FAQ
Q: Why was Cryogen’s Renata Glasc central to FlyQuest’s win?
Cryogen recorded 2/2/16 with 82% KP, tying FlyQuest’s fights together and contributing to its 22-5 finish.
Q: Did the pre-draft call on Vi and Kalista hold up?
Both champions appeared, and both delivered: Gryffinn’s Vi finished 4/0/11, while Massu’s Kalista led FlyQuest with 9/3/8.
*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-10-07 11:00 UTC.*