← Blog
Game 1

Ninjas in Pyjamas.CN Set LPL Finals Tone in Game 1

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

Ninjas in Pyjamas.CN beat JD Gaming in a 39:42 LPL 2026 finals opener, winning four dragons and stretching their run to six straight.

Ninjas in Pyjamas.CNNinjas In Pyjamas.cnWinner
Game 139:42LPLPatch 26.17
JD GamingJd Gaming
16Kills16
84.0KGold76.3K
4Drag0
11Torres6
Polymarket

Ninjas in Pyjamas 48% vs JD Gaming 52%

Ninjas In Pyjamas.cn 48.5%·Jd Gaming 51.5%·Vol: $4201K

Top players by damage

Pantheon
JungleJunJia
8/3/794% KP6.7 CS/m
Bard
SupportVampire
0/3/1488% KP0.9 CS/m
Karma
Supportfengyue
0/3/1488% KP1.2 CS/m
Polymarketmarket probability · JD Gaming · Shenzhen NINJAS IN PYJAMASCOIN FLIP
Game (draft close)Ninjas in Pyjamas.CN won (52% pre-game)
49%·52%
Series closed 3-0 — series market analysis in the final recap.

TL;DR: Ninjas in Pyjamas.CN extended their winning run to 6 by beating JD Gaming in a chaotic 39:42 LPL 2026 finals opener. The 16-16 kill score masked NIP’s control: four dragons, eleven towers and an 84.0k to 76.3k gold finish turned relentless skirmishes into the series’ defining first statement.

Key Takeaways

  • Ninjas in Pyjamas.CN claimed 4 dragons to 0, converting objective control into a decisive map advantage despite the level 16-16 kill score.
  • HOYA’s Olaf delivered 6/4/6, giving NIP a frontline carry who helped transform a -559 GoldDiff@15 into late-game pressure.
  • JunJia built JD Gaming’s early edge with +506 GoldDiff@15 on Pantheon, but that lead could not overcome NIP’s 11 towers to 6.

Early Game

JD Gaming entered with the sharper early numbers. Xiaoxu’s K'Sante held a +559 GoldDiff@15, while the jungle advantage gave the favorite room to threaten side lanes and force fights. Yet the pre-match call of Ninjas in Pyjamas.CN 5% versus JD Gaming 5% was not meaningfully confirmed as a directional prediction: both sides were assigned the same probability, although NIP did win.

The actual draft offered more than the expected Renekton- and Jarvan IV-centered script. Guwon’s Qiyana absorbed a -506 GoldDiff@15 but found the closed terrain and objective fights that suited NIP’s plan, while Care used Twisted Fate’s 2/3/7 line to keep pressure available across the map. JDG’s Caitlyn-Bard lane had priority, but NIP repeatedly returned to dragons rather than surrendering the map.

The Turning Point

The turning point was not one clean wipe; it was NIP’s repeated refusal to let JD Gaming cash in its early advantages. Photic’s Ezreal posted 6/3/7, safely contributing damage as the team denied every dragon and steadily narrowed the space JDG could use for Pantheon engage.

HongQ’s Ryze finished 1/5/11, evidence that JD Gaming still created action through Realm Warp and skirmishes. But NIP’s shields and disengage blunted the decisive follow-up. The teams each secured 1 baron, yet only one side converted its resets into towers and lasting vision control.

Closing Out

By the late game, the gold gap had opened to 84.0k to 76.3k, and the structure count told the real story: Ninjas in Pyjamas.CN had 11 towers to 6. fengyue’s Karma recorded 0/3/14, matching JDG’s support assist total while protecting the carries through the messiest exchanges.

NIP closed with the kill race tied at 16-16, a rare finish that showed why objectives mattered more than the scoreboard’s bloodshed. Their four-dragon monopoly gave every late fight a destination, and the opening win made their sixth straight victory feel like a declaration rather than a surprise.

Polymarket Market

Polymarket treated this game as nearly even at draft close, with JD Gaming at 48% and Shenzhen NINJAS IN PYJAMAS at 52%. That read was broadly correct: this was effectively a coin flip, not a massive upset, and NIP’s win validated the slim pre-game edge. The market did not fully capture how cleanly NIP’s Qiyana-Karma-Ezreal execution would translate into objective control, especially the 4 dragons to 0 advantage. Before the series, JD Gaming had held a 55% to 46% edge, so the day’s result sharply reversed that initial framing. This result closes the series 3-0, with the full series-market wrap-up belonging in the series recap.

Match Stats

PlayerTeamChampionRoleK/D/AGoldDiff@15DMG%
GALAJD GamingCaitlynBot5/4/7+48
JunJiaJD GamingPantheonJungle8/3/7+506
HongQJD GamingRyzeMid1/5/11-292
VampireJD GamingBardSupport0/3/14-103
XiaoxuJD GamingK'SanteTop2/1/9+559
PhoticNinjas in Pyjamas.CNEzrealBot6/3/7-48
GuwonNinjas in Pyjamas.CNQiyanaJungle2/3/7-506
CareNinjas in Pyjamas.CNTwisted FateMid2/3/7+292
fengyueNinjas in Pyjamas.CNKarmaSupport0/3/14+103
HOYANinjas in Pyjamas.CNOlafTop6/4/6-559

FAQ

Q: Why did Ninjas in Pyjamas.CN win despite the kill score ending level?

NIP controlled the map with 4 dragons to 0 and 11 towers to 6, building an 84.0k to 76.3k gold advantage that mattered more than kills.

Q: Did the pre-match prediction correctly call the Game 1 winner?

The 5% versus 5% call did not select a side, so NIP’s win cannot confirm a directional forecast; the draft-close market’s 52% for Shenzhen NINJAS IN PYJAMAS was more accurate.

*Odds via Polymarket, 2026-09-05 14:11 UTC.*