← Blog
Live Draft Analysis

SU Esports vs Shark Attack: Viktor Risk Defines TCL G1

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

SU Esports face Shark Attack in TCL Game 1 as Hades takes a risky Viktor into Vetheo’s Cassiopeia, widening SU’s draft advantage.

SU EsportsSu Esports
Live Draft Analysis
52%·48%
PICKS
Shark AttackShark Attack
IlllIma
IlllIma
131G49.6%VS GLBJayce
935G48.8%GLOBAL
VS TCLJayce
39G51.3%TCL
Sion
Sion
topTOP
Jayce
Jayce
Sangrod
Sangrod
GLOBAL47.5%712G
SionVS GLB50.4%131G
TCL45.5%11G
SionVS TCL
SANGROD0.0%1G
0.5 KDA
RAMES
RAMES
VS GLBUdyr
1236G51.9%GLOBAL
VS TCLUdyr
32G40.6%TCL
2.7 KDA
5G20.0%RAMES
Jarvan IV
Jarvan IV
jungleJGL
Udyr
Udyr
NightyNN
NightyNN
GLOBAL23.1%13G
Jarvan IVVS GLB
TCL
Jarvan IVVS TCL
Vetheo
Vetheo
74G58.1%VS GLBViktor
534G55.1%GLOBAL
VS TCLViktor
10G70.0%TCL
Cassiopeia
Cassiopeia
midMID
Viktor
Viktor
Hades
Hades
GLOBAL49.5%626G
CassiopeiaVS GLB41.9%74G
TCL28.6%21G
CassiopeiaVS TCL
HADES0.0%1G
1.6 KDA
Nako
Nako
7G42.9%VS GLBJinx
1257G49.4%GLOBAL
VS TCLJinx
29G69.0%TCL
Ezreal
Ezreal
bottomBOT
Jinx
Jinx
Stansfield
Stansfield
GLOBAL47.7%86G
EzrealVS GLB57.1%7G
TCL33.3%3G
EzrealVS TCL
Patch
Patch
107G61.7%VS GLBNautilus
960G55.3%GLOBAL
VS TCLNautilus
27G40.7%TCL
Bard
Bard
supportSUP
Nautilus
Nautilus
Revanche
Revanche
GLOBAL46.8%975G
BardVS GLB38.3%107G
TCL40.6%32G
BardVS TCL
REVANCHE0.0%1G
0.0 KDA
Su Esports 52%48% Shark Attack
Polymarketmarket probability · SU Esports · Shark Attack
Game 1
84%·16%
Seriesnow
89%·11%
Full model: 64% / 36%

TL;DR: In TCL Game 1, SU Esports are projected at 64% against Shark Attack’s 36%, while Hades’ Viktor enters a troubling matchup: Viktor has 29% in TCL over 21G and just 1G for Hades, versus Cassiopeia’s 42% global edge across 74G. Shark Attack need Viktor to stabilize mid before SU’s engage and roaming tools take over.

Hades is betting that Viktor can weather Vetheo’s Cassiopeia and provide late-game control, but the recent TCL record makes this a high-variance choice rather than a comfort meta pick. Shark Attack need clean early vision and NightyNN’s Udyr near mid; otherwise Cassiopeia and Patch’s Bard can turn the lane pressure into decisive objective setups.

Compositions: SU Esports vs Shark Attack

SU Esports drafted a durable engage-and-pick composition. IlllIma’s Sion creates a front line, RAMES’ Jarvan IV supplies reliable engage, Vetheo’s Cassiopeia punishes trapped targets, and Nako’s Ezreal can poke safely while Patch’s Bard roams. Their best early route is Bard movement into Jarvan IV ganks, followed by dragon fights where Sion and Cassiopeia restrict exits.

Shark Attack have stronger long-range poke through Sangrod’s Jayce and Viktor, with Stansfield’s Jinx offering scaling carry damage. Revanche’s Nautilus gives them one decisive engage tool, while NightyNN’s Udyr must absorb pressure and contest space. Their ideal game is a controlled mid game: soften SU Esports with poke, protect Jinx, and avoid giving Jarvan IV a clean engage.

Key Picks and Stats

Top lane is competitive but volatile. IlllIma’s Sion owns a 48.8% global WR over 935G and 51.3% in TCL over 39G; Sion has a 49.6% WR against Jayce over 131G. Sangrod’s Jayce is at 47.5% global over 712G, 45.5% in TCL over 11G, and 0.0% on Jayce in TCL over 1G with a 0.5 KDA. Jayce’s 50.4% WR versus Sion over 131G gives Shark Attack a lane angle, but Sion is more valuable once grouped.

The central counter-pick is Vetheo’s Cassiopeia into Hades’ Viktor. Vetheo posted 55.1% global over 534G, 70.0% in TCL over 10G, and Cassiopeia holds 58.1% versus Viktor over 74G. Hades has 49.5% global over 626G, yet only 28.6% in TCL over 21G, plus 0.0% on Viktor in TCL over 1G and a 1.6 KDA.

Bot lane favors SU’s utility. Nako’s Ezreal has 49.4% global over 1257G but 69.0% in TCL over 29G; his 42.9% versus Jinx over 7G is the warning sign. Patch’s Bard brings 55.3% global over 960G and Bard’s 61.7% against Nautilus over 107G, despite Patch’s 40.7% TCL mark over 27G.

Draft Edge

SU Esports have the clearer draft edge because Cassiopeia answers Viktor’s short-range positioning while Sion, Jarvan IV, and Bard give multiple engage paths. Their win condition is forcing fights before Jinx reaches safe scaling.

Shark Attack can still win through Jayce-Viktor poke and Jinx resets, but Udyr’s 23.1% global WR over 13G is a major fragility. They must prevent Bard roams and make Nautilus engage only after key SU cooldowns are spent.

Polymarket Market

Polymarket prices Game 1 at 84% for SU Esports and 16% for Shark Attack. The Series Now market is even more favorable to SU Esports at 89% versus 11%, making the market 5 percentage points more optimistic about SU across the series than this specific game.

No Series Pre-Match odds are available, so a market move cannot be measured or attributed. The Game price is less aggressive than the series price because Shark Attack’s Jayce, Viktor, and Jinx can punish one poorly executed engage, yet the market still heavily favors SU because Hades’ Viktor, NightyNN’s Udyr, and Revanche’s Nautilus carry weak TCL or champion-specific records.

Prediction

The model projects SU Esports at 64% and Shark Attack at 36%. The draft supports a small adjustment to 66% for SU Esports: Vetheo’s mid-lane advantage and Bard-Jarvan IV playmaking outweigh Shark Attack’s scaling, although Shark Attack’s 40.0% team-form signal means a disciplined poke game remains a live upset path.

FAQ

Q: Can Hades’ Viktor beat Vetheo’s Cassiopeia for Shark Attack?

It is possible through range control, but Cassiopeia has a 58.1% WR versus Viktor over 74G, while Hades is 0.0% on Viktor in TCL over 1G.

Q: Why is Patch’s Bard important for SU Esports against Revanche’s Nautilus?

Bard has a 61.7% WR against Nautilus over 107G, and Patch can roam with RAMES’ Jarvan IV to deny Shark Attack’s Jinx scaling window.

*Data: draftlol live draft model + Polymarket, draft close.*