← Blog
Live Draft Analysis

University of Mississippi vs Dorado Gaming Game 2: Draft Breakdown and Win Conditions

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

An in-depth League of Legends draft analysis of University of Mississippi versus Dorado Gaming in North American Challengers League Game 2.

University of MississippiUniversity Of Mississippi
Live Draft Analysis
50%·50%
PICKS
Dorado GamingDorado Gaming
Ariana
Ariana
VS GLB
GLOBAL
VS North American Challengers League
North American Challengers League
Ornn
Ornn
topTOP
Zaahen
Zaahen
Dcoy
Dcoy
GLOBAL
VS GLB
North American Challengers League
VS North American Challengers League
Griffin
Griffin
VS GLB
GLOBAL
VS North American Challengers League
North American Challengers League
Lee Sin
Lee Sin
jungleJGL
Jarvan IV
Jarvan IV
Lojaz
Lojaz
GLOBAL
VS GLB
North American Challengers League
VS North American Challengers League
Bradley
Bradley
VS GLB
GLOBAL
VS North American Challengers League
North American Challengers League
Cassiopeia
Cassiopeia
midMID
Taliyah
Taliyah
aadam
aadam
GLOBAL
VS GLB
North American Challengers League
VS North American Challengers League
Array
Array
VS GLB
GLOBAL
VS North American Challengers League
North American Challengers League
Tristana
Tristana
bottomBOT
Anivia
Anivia
Hub
Hub
GLOBAL
VS GLB
North American Challengers League
VS North American Challengers League
Bounty
Bounty
VS GLB
GLOBAL
VS North American Challengers League
North American Challengers League
Camille
Camille
supportSUP
Nautilus
Nautilus
InFlame
InFlame
GLOBAL
VS GLB
North American Challengers League
VS North American Challengers League
University Of Mississippi 50%50% Dorado Gaming
Polymarketmarket probability · University of Mississippi · Dorado Gaming
Game 2
49%·52%
Seriesnow
0%·100%

Compositions

University of Mississippi drafted a powerful front-to-back teamfight composition with several ways to force the opening. Ariana’s Ornn gives the lineup a reliable frontline and exceptional late-game upgrade value, while Bradley’s Cassiopeia turns narrow jungle paths and objective pits into dangerous terrain. Array’s Tristana supplies the sustained damage and tower pressure needed to convert won fights into map control.

The more unusual element is Bounty’s Camille support. Camille gives University of Mississippi a sharp engage angle that can bypass Dorado Gaming’s frontline and isolate a priority target. Combined with Griffin’s Lee Sin, the blue side can create explosive early skirmishes around mid lane or punish an immobile carry before a full teamfight begins. Their composition wants to establish vision first, find a flank, and let Cassiopeia punish any attempt to retreat through Miasma.

Dorado Gaming answered with a composition centered on zone control, layered engage, and pick threat. InFlame’s Nautilus and Lojaz’s Jarvan IV give them direct initiation, while aadam’s Taliyah can block escape routes and reshape fights around chokepoints. Hub’s Anivia is particularly valuable in this structure: a well-placed wall can split University of Mississippi’s formation, deny Tristana safe positioning, or trap Lee Sin after he commits.

Dcoy’s Zaahen rounds out a red-side draft that wants extended fights. Dorado Gaming have strong tools to punish reckless dives, especially if Jarvan IV can lock targets inside Cataclysm and Anivia or Taliyah can layer damage over the trapped area.

Key Picks

Cassiopeia is the central scaling pick for University of Mississippi. Dorado Gaming’s engage champions need to move forward into her range, and Miasma can be devastating against Jarvan IV, Nautilus, and Zaahen when they commit. Bradley must remain protected from Anivia wall setups, but if Cassiopeia is allowed to free-hit, Dorado Gaming’s frontline can disappear quickly.

For Dorado Gaming, Anivia bot is the highest-variance choice. Hub gives the team excellent waveclear, objective control, and defensive scaling, but Anivia lacks Tristana’s early mobility and cannot afford to misposition against Lee Sin and Camille. If Hub reaches later fights with Flash available and enough space to set up, Dorado Gaming’s control tools become extremely difficult to break.

Camille support is also a major draft pressure point. Bounty does not need to carry damage charts; the pick succeeds if it repeatedly creates numbers advantages around objectives. A Hextech Ultimatum onto Hub or aadam could decide a fight before Dorado Gaming’s defensive setup is complete.

Draft Edge

University of Mississippi hold the clearer early-tempo edge. Lee Sin, Camille, and Tristana can create proactive plays, and Ornn gives them enough durability to avoid falling apart if the opening minutes are even. Their individual win condition is straightforward: pressure side lanes, secure vision, and force Dorado Gaming to react.

Dorado Gaming have the more punishing objective setup. Their draft can make dragon and Baron approaches nearly impossible when Anivia, Taliyah, Jarvan IV, and Nautilus coordinate their cooldowns. However, that plan demands disciplined positioning and timely vision control. If they lose formation, Tristana resets and Cassiopeia damage can rapidly snowball a fight.

Prediction

University of Mississippi should have the advantage if Griffin and Bounty convert their early mobility into successful ganks. The blue side have more reliable access to Dorado Gaming’s backline and a stronger siege tool through Tristana.

Dorado Gaming can win through patient scaling and controlled objective fights, but their composition is less forgiving when caught in open terrain. University of Mississippi are favored in Game 2, provided they do not overcommit into Anivia and Taliyah’s layered control.