← Blog
Live Draft Analysis

SK Gaming vs Movistar KOI: Nautilus Draft Risk in LEC

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

SK Gaming face Movistar KOI in LEC Game 2 as Alvaro's low-WR Nautilus tests KOI's engage against Seraphine and Ashe scaling.

SK GamingSK Gaming
Live Draft Analysis
51%·49%
PICKS
Movistar KOIMovistar KOI
Wunder
Wunder
31G48.4%VS GLBOlaf
1056G55.5%GLOBAL
2G50.0%VS LECOlaf
62G58.1%LEC
2.8 KDA
9G44.4%WUNDER
Gnar
Gnar
topTOP
Olaf
Olaf
Myrwn
Myrwn
GLOBAL56.1%296G
GnarVS GLB51.6%31G
LEC55.6%18G
GnarVS LEC50.0%2G
Skeanz
Skeanz
79G51.9%VS GLBLee Sin
406G52.5%GLOBAL
4G75.0%VS LECLee Sin
31G54.8%LEC
2.0 KDA
1G0.0%SKEANZ
Skarner
Skarner
jungleJGL
Lee Sin
Lee Sin
Elyoya
Elyoya
GLOBAL55.5%667G
SkarnerVS GLB48.1%79G
LEC44.4%27G
SkarnerVS LEC25.0%4G
ELYOYA60.0%5G
8.0 KDA
SlowQ
SlowQ
27G44.4%VS GLBSylas
604G48.8%GLOBAL
2G50.0%VS LECSylas
33G48.5%LEC
4.8 KDA
4G50.0%SLOWQ
Syndra
Syndra
midMID
Sylas
Sylas
Jojopyun
Jojopyun
GLOBAL44.0%307G
SyndraVS GLB55.6%27G
LEC31.2%16G
SyndraVS LEC50.0%2G
JOJOPYUN50.0%2G
8.7 KDA
Jopa
Jopa
157G51.0%VS GLBEzreal
721G56.4%GLOBAL
11G81.8%VS LECEzreal
44G77.3%LEC
8.8 KDA
2G50.0%JOPA
Ashe
Ashe
bottomBOT
Ezreal
Ezreal
Supa
Supa
GLOBAL49.9%1396G
AsheVS GLB49.0%157G
LEC44.7%85G
AsheVS LEC18.2%11G
SUPA45.5%11G
5.5 KDA
Mikyx
Mikyx
79G59.5%VS GLBNautilus
755G54.4%GLOBAL
2G50.0%VS LECNautilus
49G63.3%LEC
8.8 KDA
2G50.0%MIKYX
Seraphine
Seraphine
supportSUP
Nautilus
Nautilus
Alvaro
Alvaro
GLOBAL46.7%1060G
SeraphineVS GLB40.5%79G
LEC31.4%51G
SeraphineVS LEC50.0%2G
ALVARO42.9%7G
3.8 KDA
SK Gaming 51%49% Movistar KOI
Polymarketmarket probability · SK Gaming · Movistar KOI
Game 2
34%·67%
Seriesnow
50%·51%
Pre-matchseries · 90 min before
22%·79%
Δ Series: +28.0pp for SK GamingFull model: 34% / 66%

TL;DR: In LEC Game 2, SK Gaming’s 34% draft-model chance against Movistar KOI’s 66% hinges on KOI making Alvaro’s Nautilus work into Seraphine: the support has a 31.4% LEC WR over 51G and a 40.5% global WR over 79G in this matchup. KOI need decisive engage before SK’s Ashe-led scaling controls objectives.

Alvaro’s Nautilus is a deliberate volatility pick rather than a safe answer into Mikyx’s Seraphine. Movistar KOI are betting that Nautilus hooks and Lee Sin follow-up can force fights before SK Gaming establish Ashe poke, shields, and front-to-back teamfights.

Compositions: SK Gaming vs Movistar KOI

SK Gaming have a layered teamfight and scaling composition. Wunder’s Gnar and Skeanz’s Skarner provide engage and peel, while SlowQ’s Syndra and Jopa’s Ashe supply poke and pick threat. Mikyx’s Seraphine turns clustered fights into a durable carry setup; SK want controlled early lanes, then objective setups where Ashe arrows begin fights on their terms.

Movistar KOI are more skirmish-oriented. Myrwn’s Olaf wants to run through Gnar’s frontline, Elyoya’s Lee Sin needs gank angles, and Jojopyun’s Sylas can flex stolen ultimates into explosive engages. Supa’s Ezreal offers safe poke, but KOI lack reliable scaling damage if Nautilus cannot start clean fights. Their best mid-game route is a snowball through side-lane pressure and contested dragons.

Key Picks and Stats

Top lane is close but favors KOI’s proactive angle. Wunder’s Gnar owns a 55.5% global WR over 1056G and 58.1% LEC WR over 62G, yet he is 44.4% on Gnar in LEC over 9G with a 2.8 KDA. Against Olaf, Gnar has a 48.4% global WR over 31G. Myrwn’s Olaf posts 56.1% globally over 296G and 55.6% in LEC over 18G.

Skeanz’s Skarner has a 52.5% global WR over 406G and 54.8% LEC WR over 31G, but Skeanz is 0.0% on the champion in 1G. Elyoya’s Lee Sin is only 44.4% in LEC over 27G, although his personal Lee Sin record is 60.0% over 5G with an 8.0 KDA. Skarner holds a 75.0% LEC WR versus Lee Sin over 4G.

Bot lane is SK’s strongest statistical counter-pick. Jopa’s Ashe has a 56.4% global WR over 721G, a 77.3% LEC WR over 44G, and an 81.8% LEC WR versus Ezreal over 11G. Supa’s Ezreal sits at 49.9% globally over 1396G, 44.7% in LEC over 85G, and 18.2% versus Ashe in LEC over 11G. Mikyx’s Seraphine adds a 63.3% LEC WR over 49G.

Draft Edge

The forecasted B1 picks were not confirmed: neither Anivia for Movistar KOI nor Pantheon for SK Gaming appeared. The expected bans cannot be verified from the available draft, but this board diverged sharply from last night’s anticipated Rumble, Anivia, and Pantheon priorities.

KOI retain the draft edge through Olaf, Lee Sin, and Sylas engage, but SK’s bottom lane is the cleaner counter-pick package. SK win by surviving early ganks, using Seraphine shields against Nautilus engage, and letting Ashe poke dictate objectives. KOI win if Elyoya repeatedly creates access for Olaf and Sylas before SK’s scaling formation is complete.

Polymarket Market

Polymarket prices Game 2 at SK Gaming 34% and Movistar KOI 66%, exactly matching the draft model. The Series market is tighter: SK are 48% and KOI 52%. Before the match, SK were only 22% against KOI’s 78%, so SK gained 27.0 percentage points in the Series market.

That movement follows SK’s 24-13 kill, 29:20 Game 1 win, which gives SK momentum and explains why the series market is more optimistic about them than the specific Game 2 market. The Game price still favors KOI more heavily because their Olaf-Lee Sin-Sylas engage can punish SK’s low-experience Skarner and exploit the risky Nautilus timing window.

Prediction

The model remains SK Gaming 34% versus Movistar KOI 66%. I would keep it at 35% to 65%: SK’s 0.300 team-form signal and 0.321 Elo signal remain major warnings, but Game 1 and Jopa’s Ashe-versus-Ezreal lane data create a credible upset route. KOI’s 0.600 form signal and 0.679 Elo signal still justify favorite status.

FAQ

Q: Can Jopa’s Ashe and Mikyx’s Seraphine carry SK Gaming against Supa’s Ezreal and Alvaro’s Nautilus?

Yes, if SK avoid early hooks: Ashe has an 81.8% LEC WR versus Ezreal over 11G, while Seraphine has a 63.3% LEC WR over 49G.

Q: Why is Alvaro’s Nautilus such a risk against Mikyx’s Seraphine?

Nautilus has a 31.4% LEC WR over 51G and a 40.5% global WR versus Seraphine over 79G, so KOI need clean engage execution rather than extended front-to-back fights.

*Data: draftlol live draft model + Polymarket, draft close.*