Sentinels' Naafiri Gamble vs FlyQuest's Blue Side Control in LCS Game 2
Sentinels attempt a high-risk Naafiri pick to disrupt FlyQuest's scaling composition in this LCS Game 2 draft analysis.
Sentinels are attempting to break the momentum of FlyQuest's Game 1 victory by introducing a high-variance jungle threat. By selecting Naafiri, HamBak is looking to bypass the traditional frontline scaling of the blue side, forcing FlyQuest to react to aggressive, single-target dive potential rather than settling into a controlled teamfight rhythm.
Compositions
FlyQuest has drafted a classic scaling and utility-heavy composition designed to dominate the mid-to-late game. With the presence of Milio and Cassiopeia, their win condition relies on protecting their carries and punishing any misplaced engagement. This is a "protect the hypercarry" setup that thrives in prolonged skirmishes and late-game siege scenarios.
In contrast, Sentinels have opted for a "pick and burst" strategy. Their draft features high-impact, single-target threats like Naafiri and Ashe, paired with the massive frontline of Sion. They want to create chaotic skirmishes in the jungle and mid-game, using the threat of an engage from Sion and the follow-up from Naafiri to catch FlyQuest players out of position before they can reach their full item spikes.
Key Picks and Stats
The top lane presents a fascinating clash of styles. Gakgos is on Jayce, a pick that boasts a 35.3% LCS WR but a much more reliable 80.0% LCS WR specifically for this player with a 6.2 KDA. He faces Impact on Sion, who maintains a 45.9% LCS WR on the tank. While Jayce has a 50.5% global WR against Sion, the lane remains a volatile split-push battle.
The jungle matchup is where the draft's volatility lies. HamBak's Naafiri is a massive wildcard; while he has a 100.0% LCS WR on the champion (albeit in only 1G), the champion globally struggles against Gryffinn's preferred Shen, which holds a 66.7% global WR against Naafiri. Gryffinn's Shen brings a massive 11.9 KDA in the LCS, providing the stability FlyQuest needs to weather the Naafiri storm.
In the mid lane, Quad's Cassiopeia faces DARKWINGS' Orianna. DARKWINGS is highly proficient on Orianna with a 53.8% LCS WR, but he faces a nightmare matchup: Cassiopeia holds a devastating 28.6% global WR against Oriand in the current data. If Quad can navigate the lane pressure, his 50.0% LCS WR on the serpent provides the necessary DPS.
The bot lane features Massu on Lucian, a pick with a 38.1% LCS WR, paired with Cryogen's Milio (33.3% LCS WR). They face the high-utility Ashe of Rahel (40.7% LCS WR) and huhi's Seraphine (51.9% LCS WR). While Rahel's Ashe has a 55.3% global WR against Lucian, the synergy of Milio and Cassiopeia provides the defensive layer necessary to negate the Sentinels' engage.
Draft Edge
The edge in this draft belongs to FlyQuest, primarily due to their superior scaling and the sheer difficulty of executing the Sentinels' dive-heavy strategy. While Naafiri and Sion can create early chaos, FlyQuest has drafted the exact tools—Milio, Shen, and Cassiopeia—to negate dive and out-scale the opposition. Sentinels must find much more than just a single pick; they must dismantle a frontline that is mathematically designed to survive their initial burst.
Polymarket Market
The prediction markets are showing a significant divergence between the immediate game and the overall series. For Game 2, the market favors Sentinels at 56%, whereas the Series market is heavily leaning toward FlyQuest at 70%. This indicates that while bettors believe Sentinels have a high chance to even the series with their aggressive draft, they do not believe Sentinels are the favorites to win the entire matchup.
Notably, the Series market has seen a massive swing, moving from a 58% advantage for FlyQuest pre-match to 70% now—a +12.0 percentage point increase. This movement is driven by FlyQuest's dominant Game 1 performance. The fact that the Game 2 market (56% Sentinels) is much more optimistic for the underdog than the Series market suggests that the "chaos" factor of the Naafiri/Sion draft is being priced in as a high-risk, high-reward play for Sentinels.
Prediction
The model predicts a slight edge for Sentinels at 52% for this specific game, likely accounting for the volatility of the Naafiri pick and the momentum of the Sentinels' recent form (60% team form). However, I am adjusting this prediction toward FlyQuest at 54%. The structural advantages of the FlyQuest composition—specifically the Cassiopeia/Milio defensive core—are too mathematically sound to ignore against a Sentinels draft that lacks a reliable way to bypass the frontline in the late game.
In This Series