← Blog
Live Draft Analysis

Aurora Risk Tests Dplus Kia in LCK Challengers

By Draftlol Analysis Desk

Dplus Kia Challengers face Nongshim Esports Academy in LCK Challengers Game 4 as SeTab’s risky Aurora tests Anivia’s lane control.

Dplus Kia ChallengersDplus Kia Challengers
Live Draft Analysis
50%·50%
PICKS
Nongshim Esports AcademyNongshim Esports Academy
Jaehyuk
Jaehyuk
10G50.0%VS GLBGnar
309G55.3%GLOBAL
2G50.0%VS LCK CLGnar
29G62.1%LCK CL
11.0 KDA
2G100.0%JAEHYUK
Gwen
Gwen
topTOP
Gnar
Gnar
Janus
Janus
GLOBAL55.0%1115G
GwenVS GLB50.0%10G
LCK CL58.9%112G
GwenVS LCK CL50.0%2G
JANUS66.7%27G
3.5 KDA
Solid
Solid
197G48.2%VS GLBVi
1344G48.5%GLOBAL
27G40.7%VS LCK CLVi
125G48.0%LCK CL
3.9 KDA
2G100.0%SOLID
Xin Zhao
Xin Zhao
jungleJGL
Vi
Vi
MihawK
MihawK
GLOBAL53.5%1137G
Xin ZhaoVS GLB51.8%197G
LCK CL58.5%118G
Xin ZhaoVS LCK CL59.3%27G
MIHAWK50.0%12G
3.1 KDA
Garden
Garden
18G72.2%VS GLBAurora
598G52.2%GLOBAL
VS LCK CLAurora
60G53.3%LCK CL
6.8 KDA
6G100.0%GARDEN
Anivia
Anivia
midMID
Aurora
Aurora
SeTab
SeTab
GLOBAL43.4%851G
AniviaVS GLB27.8%18G
LCK CL43.2%74G
AniviaVS LCK CL
SETAB55.6%9G
3.6 KDA
Wayne
Wayne
4G50.0%VS GLBZeri
886G45.5%GLOBAL
VS LCK CLZeri
67G46.3%LCK CL
11.1 KDA
5G60.0%WAYNE
Jhin
Jhin
bottomBOT
Zeri
Zeri
Lucy
Lucy
GLOBAL44.0%141G
JhinVS GLB50.0%4G
LCK CL41.2%17G
JhinVS LCK CL
LUCY0.0%1G
1.0 KDA
Loopy
Loopy
11G45.5%VS GLBYuumi
808G47.5%GLOBAL
2G50.0%VS LCK CLYuumi
43G46.5%LCK CL
7.5 KDA
11G72.7%LOOPY
Karma
Karma
supportSUP
Yuumi
Yuumi
Pleata
Pleata
GLOBAL42.7%75G
KarmaVS GLB54.5%11G
LCK CL27.3%11G
KarmaVS LCK CL50.0%2G
Dplus Kia Challengers 50%50% Nongshim Esports Academy
Polymarketmarket probability · Dplus Kia Challengers · Nongshim Esports Academy
Game 4
56%·44%
Seriesnow
79%·22%
Full model: 61% / 39%

TL;DR: Dplus Kia Challengers face Nongshim Esports Academy in LCK Challengers Game 4 with the draft model favoring Dplus Kia Challengers 61% to 39%. SeTab’s Aurora is the defining risk: Aurora holds a 43.2% LCK Challengers WR in 74G and only 27.8% versus Anivia in 18G, so Nongshim need early Vi pressure to unlock her.

Compositions: Dplus Kia Challengers vs Nongshim Esports Academy

Dplus Kia Challengers drafted a controlled teamfight and poke composition around Garden’s Anivia, Wayne’s Jhin, and Loopy’s Karma. Solid’s Xin Zhao supplies early skirmish cover, while Jaehyuk’s Gwen gives them a side-lane threat and reliable scaling. Their ideal game is to deny Vi’s first successful gank, establish Anivia terrain control around objectives, then force Nongshim through Jhin and Karma poke.

Nongshim Esports Academy have sharper engage and a more volatile scaling route. MihawK’s Vi can create the first opening for SeTab’s Aurora, while Janus’s Gnar offers follow-up engage and Lucy’s Zeri with Pleata’s Yuumi becomes the late-game carry package. The red side must snowball through decisive mid-jungle action; an even mid game leaves Aurora exposed to Anivia’s control and makes Zeri’s scaling harder to access.

Key Picks and Stats

The mid lane is the draft’s central counter-pick story. Garden’s Anivia has a 52.2% global WR over 598G, a 53.3% LCK Challengers WR over 60G, and Garden is 100.0% on the champion in 6G with a 6.8 KDA. Anivia is 72.2% versus Aurora in 18G. By contrast, SeTab’s Aurora has a 43.4% global WR over 851G, a 43.2% league WR over 74G, but SeTab has produced a 55.6% WR in 9G with a 3.6 KDA. This is a deliberate comfort gamble rather than a meta-safe pick.

Top is closer: Jaehyuk’s Gwen carries a 55.3% global WR in 309G, 62.1% in league over 29G, and a 100.0% personal WR in 2G with an 11.0 KDA. Janus’s Gnar answers with 55.0% globally in 1115G, 58.9% in league over 112G, and 66.7% for Janus in 27G; their direct league matchup is 50.0% in 2G.

Jungle favors Nongshim’s historical lane matchup: Vi is 59.3% versus Xin Zhao in league over 27G, while Xin Zhao is 40.7% against Vi. Still, Solid is 100.0% on Xin Zhao in 2G, whereas MihawK is 50.0% on Vi in 12G. Bot is unstable: Wayne’s Jhin is 60.0% in 5G with an 11.1 KDA, while Lucy is 0.0% on Zeri in 1G.

Draft Edge

Dplus Kia Challengers hold the cleaner draft edge because Anivia directly challenges Aurora’s documented weakness, and Gwen can punish Gnar after early lanes. Their win condition is patient objective setup, denying Vi engage angles, and using Karma-Jhin poke before Gwen enters.

Nongshim’s route is narrower but real: Vi must repeatedly gank mid, Aurora must roam before Anivia can lock waves, and Zeri-Yuumi must reach protected teamfights. Gnar-Vi’s 59.79% synergy across 29.534440963281906G is their best coordinated signal.

Polymarket Market

Polymarket prices Game 4 at 56% for Dplus Kia Challengers and 44% for Nongshim Esports Academy. The Series Now market is much more decisive at 78% to 22%. No Series Pre-Match price is available, so movement cannot be measured or attributed precisely.

The Game market is more optimistic about Nongshim than the series market: Nongshim receive 44% in this map versus 22% for the series. That gap reflects a plausible red-side fighting draft—Vi, Gnar, Aurora, Zeri, and Yuumi can overwhelm a single misposition—but the market still respects Dplus Kia’s Anivia counter and superior game-to-game position.

Prediction

The model’s 61% to 39% call for Dplus Kia Challengers remains justified, though the market argues for a slightly tighter 59% to 41% practical view. Dplus won G1 15-10 in 33:40 and G3 14-6 in 26:50, while Nongshim answered in G2 5-16 in 29:10. Dplus’s 0.750 team-form signal and 0.641 Elo signal outweigh Nongshim’s explosive engage potential, but another successful Vi-Aurora early game could change the mental state of the series.

FAQ

Q: Can SeTab’s Aurora beat Garden’s Anivia despite the matchup data?

A: Yes, but MihawK’s Vi must create the lane’s first gank. Aurora is only 27.8% versus Anivia in 18G, yet SeTab has a 55.6% personal WR on Aurora in 9G.

Q: Why is Dplus Kia Challengers favored with Wayne’s low-WR Jhin?

A: Wayne’s Jhin has a 46.3% league WR over 67G, but Wayne personally owns a 60.0% WR in 5G and an 11.1 KDA. Lucy’s Zeri is 0.0% in 1G, making bot lane less dependable for Nongshim.

*Data: draftlol live draft model + Polymarket, draft close.*